Abstract
Standards of compatibility have gained considerable attention in recent economic modelling in industrial economics (for example, Gilbert (ed.), 1992) as well as in public policy (see Commission of the European Communities, 1991).1 Within large technical systems (e.g. railway systems, telecommunications systems) the complicated procedure of standard-setting has gained particular attention (e.g. Weinkopf, 1993, Genschel and Werle, 1992). Hierarchical control of standard-setting within network monopolies is considered no longer appropriate due to the recent trend towards vertical disintegration, deregulation and internationalization (for further discussion, see Knieps, 1993). As a consequence of the growing number of interfaces between decentralized subsystems, alternative external institutions, in particular committees, markets and regulatory commissions, play an increasing role within the standardization processes.
Critical comments by Charles B. Blankart and Lüder Gerken on an earlier version of this paper are gratefully acknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baumol, W.J., J.C. Panzar and R.D. Willig (1982) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure (San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).
Berg, S.V. (1989) ‘The Production of Compatibility: Technical Standards as Collective Goods’, Kyklos, 42, pp. 361–83.
Blankart, Ch. B. and G. Knieps (1992) ‘The Critical Mass Problem in a Dynamic World: Theory and Applications to Telecommunications’, in F. Klaver and P. Slaa (eds), Telecommunication — New Signposts to Old Roads (Amsterdam, Oxford, Washington, Tokyo: IOS Press), pp. 55–63.
Blankart, Ch. B. and G. Knieps (1993) ‘State and standards’, Public Choice, 77, pp. 39–52.
Blankart, Ch. B. and G. Knieps (1994) ‘Market-Oriented Open Network Provision’, Discussion Paper No. 9, Institut für Verkehrswissenschaft und Regionalpolitik, Freiburg.
Braeutigam, R.R. (1981) ‘Regulation of Multiproduct Enterprises by Rate of Return, Mark Up and Operating Ratio’, Research in Law and Economics, 3, pp. 15–38.
Collins, H. (1986) ‘Data Communications Standards: A Report from the War-Zone’. Paper presented at the Conference on Product Standardization and Competitive Strategy, Paris.
Commission of the European Communities, (1987) ‘Green Paper on the Development of the Common Market for Telecommunications Services’, KOM (87) 290 endg., Brussels.
Commission of the European Communities, 1991. ‘Commission communication on the development of European stand-ardization — Action for faster technological integration in Europe’, Official Journal of the European Communities, 34, C 20, 28 January 1991.
Commission of the European Communities, (1992) ‘Draft Proposal for a Council Directive amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community’s railways’. Brussels.
Community of European Railways (1989) ‘Proposals for a European High-Speed Network’. Paris, January.
David, P.A. and S. Greenstein (1990) ‘The Economics of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction to Recent Research’, Economic Innovation and New Technologies, 1, pp. 3–41.
Farrell, J. and G. Saloner (1988) ‘Co-ordination through committees and markets’, Rand Journal of Economics, 19, pp. 235–52.
Fremdling, R. and G. Knieps (1993) ‘Competition, Regulation and Nationalization: The Prussian Railway System in the Nineteenth Century’, Scandinavian Economic History Review, 41, pp. 129–54.
Gabler, H. (1989) ‘ETSI-European Telecommunications Standards Institute’. Nachrichtentechnische Zeitung (ntz), 42, pp. 574–9.
Genschel, P. and R. Werle (1992) ‘From National Hierarchies to International Standardization: Historical and Modal Changes in the Coordination of Telecommunications’. Max-Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, MPIFG Discussion Paper 92/1, February.
Gilbert, R.J. (ed.) (1992) ‘Symposium on Compatibility’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 40, pp. 1–123.
Knieps, G. (1990) ‘Deregulation in Europe: Telecommunication and Transportation’, in G. Majone (ed.), Deregulation or Re-regulation? Regulatory Reform in Europe and the United States (London: Pinter Publishers), pp. 72–100.
Knieps, G. (1992) ‘The Challenge of the European Railways’. Research Memorandum No. 481, Faculty of Economics, University of Groningen.
Knieps, G. (1993) ‘Competition, coordination and cooperation. A disaggregated approach to transportation regulation’, Utilities Policy, 3, pp. 201–7.
Knieps, G. (1994) ‘Die Telekommunikation als Gegenstand der Industriepolitik in Europa, den USA und Japan aus wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Sicht’. Forthcoming in E.J. Mestmäcker (ed.), Ordnungsprinzipien im Wirtschaftsrecht der Telekommunikation (Baden-Baden: Nomos).
Leland, H.E. (1979) ‘Quacks, lemons and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards’, Journal of Political Economy, 86, pp. 1328–46.
Monopolkommission (1992) Wettbewerbspolitik oder Industriepolitik. Hauptgutachten 1990/1991 (Baden-Baden: Nomos).
Müller, J. (1992) ‘Scenarios of 1992 and Consequences for Euro-Japanese Relationship’, in F. Meyer, Kramer, J. Müller and B. Preißl (eds), Information Technologies: Impacts, Policies and Future Perspectives (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer).
Neu, W., K. -H. Neumann and T. Schnöring (1987) ‘Trade patterns, industry structure and industrial policy in telecommunications’, Telecommunications Policy, 11, pp. 31–44.
Ploeger, L.F. (1991) ‘Revolution on rails’. European rail, Communities of European Railways, Newsletter, No. 10, Sept.–Oct.
Spulber, D.F. (1989) Regulation and Markets (Cambridge: MIT Press).
UIC (1990) ‘Geschäftsbericht 1990–1991’.
Spulber, D.F. (1994) ‘UIC-Reform’, Pressemitteilung No. 67,25 January 1994.
Ungerer, H. (1994) ‘Maßnahmen der EG zur Öffnung der Telekommunikations Dienstleistungsmärkte für neue Wettbewerber’. Euroforum Konferenz, Bad Homburg.
Weinkopf, M. (1993) ‘Ökonomie des ONP-Konzeptes’. Diskussionsbeitrag No. 118, WIK, Bad Honnef, November.
Weise, H. (1992) ‘Nichts paßt bei der Bahn, Europas Eisenbahnen: Jeder macht, was er will, keiner macht was er soll, aber alle machen mit’, Die Zeit, No. 48, November 20, p. 52.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 Lüder Gerken
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knieps, G. (1995). Standardization: The Evolution of Institutions versus Government Intervention. In: Gerken, L. (eds) Competition among Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/9781349242627_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/9781349242627_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-24264-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24262-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)