Abstract
By any reckoning, Blackmail is now considered to be a ‘classic’ film. There are several criteria on which this may be judged. First, Blackmail has continued to draw the attention and interest of modern audiences, as witnessed in frequent revivals in specialist cinemas, screenings on television, and re-releases on video and DVD. Second, it stands as a landmark in film history because it was long assumed to be Britain’s first feature film with dialogue. Although film historians latterly have shown that there were other contenders for this title, Blackmail retained its status due to the sheer originality with which the new technology was deployed.1 It demonstrated that sound could be used with imaginative flair, and at a time when many talkies aspired only to reproduce dialogue, this was a landmark in itself. Third, Blackmail had a remarkable (and complicated) production history that has become one of film history’s legends. Originally produced as a silent feature, it was only when filming was nearly completed that the studio, British International Pictures (BIP), decided that a talking version should be made as well. This brought a host of challenges, and not least because the leading actress, Anny Ondra, was Czechoslovakian and therefore unsuited to her English-speaking role. None the less, both a silent and a sound version were released in 1929, and comparisons between the two have captivated cineastes for decades.2 Fourth, and most importantly for the purposes of this chapter, from the time of its release until the present day, Blackmail has inspired extensive critical and scholarly attention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See the discussion in Rachael Low, The History of the British Film, 1918–29 ( London: George Allen & Unwin, 1971 ), p. 205
Tom Ryall, Alfred Hitchcock and the British Cinema ( London: Croom Helm, 1986 ), pp. 94–5.
For an authoritative comparison of the two versions, see the chapter in Charles Barr, English Hitchcock ( Dumfriesshire: Cameron & Hollis, 1999 ), pp. 81–97.
Kenneth MacPherson, ‘As Is’, Close Up, 5: 4 (October 1929), pp. 257–63
Paul Rotha, The Filin Till Now: A Survey of World Cinema ( London: Jonathan Cape, 1930 ), p. 321.
Eric Rohmer and Claude Chabrol, Hitchcock: The First Forty-Four Films (Oxford: Roundhouse, 1979 (1957)), p. 23.
Tania Modleski, The Women Who Knew Too Much: Hitchcock and Feminist Theory ( London: Routledge, 1988 ), pp. 17–30.
Patrick McGilligan, Alfred Hitchcock: A Life in Darkness and in Light ( New York: Regan, 2003 ), p. 122.
The critical standing of the thriller was particularly low in the 1930s. See James Chapman, ‘Celluloid Shockers’, in Jeffrey Richards (ed.), The Unknown 1930s: An Alternative History of the British Cinema, 1929–39 ( London: I. B. Tauris, 1998 ), pp. 75–97.
Robin Wood, Hitchcock’s Filins Revisited (London: Faber & Faber, 1989 (1965)).
Hitchcock and Truffaut discuss this story in François Truffaut, Hitchcock: The Definitive Study (London: Paladin, 1986 (1968)), p. 20.
John Russell Taylor, Hitch: The Authorised Biography of Alfred Hitchcock (London: Abacus, 1981 (1978)), p. 6.
Donald Spoto, The Dark Side of Genius: The Life of Alfred Hitchcock (New York: Ballantine, 1993 (1983)).
For a discussion of the film’s sound qualities, see Elisabeth Weis, The Silent Scream: Alfred Hitchcock’s Soundtrack ( New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson, 1982 ), pp. 28–33.
Alexander Walker, The Shattered Silents: How the Talkies Came to Stay ( London: Elm Tree, 1978 ), pp. 87–9.
Tom Ryall, Blackmail: BFI Film Classics (London: British Film Institute, 1992), p. ii.
Letter from L. D. Sanders, Picturegoer, July 1929, p. 61.
Letter from M.K.R., Brighton, Picturegoer, November 1929, p. 80.
Letter from L. Ritchie, Preston, Picturegoer, March 1930, p. 71.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glancy, M. (2007). Blackmail (1929), Hitchcock and Film Nationalism. In: Chapman, J., Glancy, M., Harper, S. (eds) The New Film History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/9780230206229_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/9780230206229_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-59448-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-20622-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)