Skip to main content

Learning Outcomes Among College Students in Japan: Comparative Analysis Between and Within Universities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Measuring Quality of Undergraduate Education in Japan

Abstract

This chapter shows the meaning of student surveys, which serve as a representative method for indirect assessment. In this chapter, it is investigated how to understand the outcome assessed by college impact studies, which in turn influence student surveys. Next, it explores the relationship between the enhancement of students’ affective aspects and learning outcomes. The Japanese College Student Survey (JCSS) will serve here as a basis for enabling comparisons of student surveys established at the University of California, Los Angeles Higher Education Research Institute, which have been conducted over the course of many years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Astin (1993, p. 45).

  2. 2.

    Following an investigation into cultural and social differences, the JCSS and the Japan Freshman Survey (JFS), which are Japan’s versions of the CSS and the CIRP established at UCLA, included a series of additional questions unique to Japan that would enable a comparison to be made between Japan and the USA.

  3. 3.

    In response to three questions: “Is your student life fulfilling?,” “Are you satisfied with your university experiences on the whole?,” and “If you could revise your decision, would you choose to enter the same university again or not?,” students who answered at least two questions positively were classified as “positive students,” while those who answered one or less positively were denoted as “negative students.”

  4. 4.

    It is possible to purchase direct data as part of cooperative research, although such information was not utilized on this occasion.

  5. 5.

    These items are called with a factor name of “traditional knowledge and skills” when the principal component analysis was conducted regarding the acquired knowledge and skills using the JCSS2005 and the JCSS2007 direct data.

  6. 6.

    Table 6.3 includes only those of the four factors that have displayed a significant difference between the factor scores of the student group who reported satisfaction with their overall university experience and those who did not. The questions and the factor loadings composing the factors extracted from the principal component analysis are explained as follows. The items that compose the first factor are the aspects necessary for building relationships with others, called external affective factor (cooperativeness 0.725, social confidence 0.697, understanding of others 0.664, popularity 0.642, level of affective stability 0.613, leadership 0.561, speaking ability 0.480, self-understanding 0.464, and physical health 0.468). The items that compose the second factor are the dimensions that support academic achievements at university, known as internal cognitive factors (academic strength 0.817, intellectual confidence 0.772, general accomplishments 0.722, reading comprehension 0.612, mathematical ability 0.607, and written expression 0.507). The items that compose the third factor may be considered as those aspects supporting individuality and artistic qualities, called internal affective factors (artistic ability 0.787 and creativity 0.737). The items that compose the fourth factor are related to the aspects necessary for positive, forward-looking advancement, which was rendered as external behavioral factors (competitiveness 0.649 and motivation 0.520).

  7. 7.

    Referenced from Furuta (2007, pp. 212–216).

References

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation. In higher education. Phoenix: ORYX Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuta, K. (2007). The structure of motives for educational expenditures: Decision tree analysis of attitudes toward education. The Journal of Educational Sociology, 80, 207–224 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, F. (1981). Study of career choice of college students. The Journal of Educational Sociology, 36, 101–111. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (1977). The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizokami, S. (Ed.). (2001). Identity and life style of college students: Psychology of college students. Kyoto: Nakanishiya Publishers (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, N. (2001). How competency changes undergraduate education? Japanese Journal of Higher Education Research, 4, 71–91 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, N. (2008). Students engagement and college outcomes. Japanese Journal of Higher Education Research, 11, 45–64 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P, T. (2005). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, K. (Ed.). (2003). Current status of campus life. Tokyo: Tamagawa University Press (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, K. (Ed.). (2005). College and campus life. Tokyo: Sophia University Press (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyoda, H. (2001). Statistics: An introduction to data mining. Tokyo: Kodansha Blueback’s (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, R. (2007). “Emotional Fulfillment of Japanese Students and University Education: Analysis of CSS and JCSS”, Research in Higher Education, 40, 181–198 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, R. (Ed.). (2009). Science of undergraduate education: Comparative international study of learning assessment. Tokyo: Tamagawa University Press (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimoto, K. (2004). Comparative study of competency of higher education between Japan and Europe. Report of science research fund (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reiko Yamada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yamada, R. (2014). Learning Outcomes Among College Students in Japan: Comparative Analysis Between and Within Universities. In: Yamada, R. (eds) Measuring Quality of Undergraduate Education in Japan. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-81-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics