Skip to main content

Assessment of Carbon Footprinting in the Wood Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors, Volume 2

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

Abstract

The management of natural resources is a subject that often arises when sustainable development is considered. Wood is a renewable, biological raw material used in numerous applications and is therefore growing in importance for sustainable development efforts. This chapter presents the applicability of carbon footprinting in the wood industry by comparing the carbon footprint of 14 primary wood products: air-dried and kiln-dried softwood and hardwood sawn timber, hard fiberboard, glued laminated timber for indoor and outdoor use, medium-density fiber board, oriented strand board, particleboard for indoor and outdoor use, plywood for indoor and outdoor use, and wood pellets. Furthermore, the use of timber products for the purposes of carbon storage and the effect of allocation methods on carbon footprinting are discussed. Additionally, the European policy strategies and actions directly impacting the forest products industry are discussed in relation to primary wood products. Also, wood as a building material and its placement in green building programs are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barbu M, van Riet C (2008) European panels market developments—current situation and trends. In: The proceeds of the SWST annual convention, Concepción, Chile, 2008. Madison 2008. Society of Wood Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Benetto E, Becker M, Welfring J (2009) Life cycle assessment of oriented strand boards (OSB): from process innovation to ecodesign. Env Sci Technol 43(15):6003–6009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund L, Rowell RM (2005) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 279–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodig J, Jayne B (1982) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. New York, p 712

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer JL (2008) The green movement and the forest products industry. Forest Prod J 58(7/8):6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan AH (2006) Can timber buildings help reduce global CO2 emissions? Proceedings, world conference on timber engineering, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan AH (2010) Energy and CO2 advantages of wood for sustainable buildings. Proceedings, world conference on timber engineering, Riva-del-Garda

    Google Scholar 

  • Carre A (2011) A comparative life cycle assessment of alternative constructions of a typical Australian house design. Forest and Wood Products Australia Limited, p 121. www.fwpa.com.au

  • CEN/TC 350 (2012) Sustainability of construction works

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini F, Strømman AH (2011) Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour Technol 102:437–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Gallasch S (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:434–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Change (2001) IPCC third assessment report. The scientific basis. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/. Accessed 3 May 2010

  • Construction Products Regulation (305/2011) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC

    Google Scholar 

  • Earles J, Halo A, Shaler S (2011) Improving the environmental profile of wood panels via co-production of ethanol and acetic acid. Env Sci Technol 45(22):9743–9749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ecoinvent 2.0 (2010) Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) (2012) EN 15804: sustainability of construction works—environmental product declarations—core rules for the product category of construction products

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) (2011) EN 15978: sustainability of construction works—assessment of environmental performance of buildings—calculation method

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) (2013) FprEN 16449: wood and wood-based products—calculation of the biogenic carbon content of wood and conversion to carbon dioxide Final draft 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) (2012). EN 16485: round and sawn timber—environmental product declarations—product category rules for wood and wood-based products for use in construction Draft 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Mainstreaming sustainable development into EU policies: 2009 review of the European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. Communication. European Commission European Commission, Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52009DC0400:EN:NOT

  • European Commission (2011) A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. Communication. European Commission European Commission, Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52011DC0112:EN:NOT

  • European Committee for Standardization (2011) 15942:2011: Sustainability of construction works—environmental product declarations—communication format business-to-business. Standard. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament, Council (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Directive. European Parliament European Parliament, Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32008L0098:EN:NOT

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2010) Global forest resource assessment 2010 main report. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2013) FAOSTAT database. http://faostat.fao.org/site/362/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=362. Accessed 4 Nov 2013

  • Forest-based Sector Technology Platform (2013a) Horizons—vision 2030 for the European forest-based sector. Research agenda. Filip De Jaeger, Gérant FTP Forest-based Sector Technology Platform, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest-based Sector Technology Platform (2013b) Strategic research and innovation agenda for 2020. Research agenda. Filip de Jaeger, Gérant FTP Forest-based Sector Technology Platform, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Products Laboratory (2010) Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Garcia S, Feijoo G, Heathcote C, Kandelbauer A, Moreira M (2011) Environmental assessment of green hardboard production coupled with a laccase activating system. J Clean Prod 19(5):445–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall DO, Scrase JI (1998) Will biomass be the environmentally friendly fuel of the future? Biomass Bioenergy 15(4/5):357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halog A (2009) Models for evaluating energy, environmental and sustainability performance of biofuels value chain. Int J Glob Energy Energy Issues 32(1/2):87–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill CAS (2011) An introduction to sustainable resource use. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) 14040: environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006) 14044:2006: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2009) 14025: environmental Labels and declarations—type III environmental declarations—principles and procedures. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungmeier G, Werner F, Jarnehammar A, Hohenthal C, Richter K (2002) Allocation in LCA of wood-based Products. Experiences of cost action E9. Part I. Methodology. Int J LCA 7(5):290–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Leek N (2010) Post-consumer wood. In: EUwood—real potential for changes in growth and use of EU forests. Final Report. EUwood, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm EL, Berg S, Hansson PA (2010) Energy efficiency and the environmental impact of harvesting stumps and logging residues. Eur J Forest Res 129:1223–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oneil EE, Johnson LR, Lippke BR, McCarter JB, McDill ME, Roth PA, Finley JC (2010) Life-cycle impacts of inland Northwest and Northeast/North central forest resources. Wood Fiber Sci 42:29–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • PAS 2050 (2011) Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen AK, Solberg B (2005) Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden. Forest Policy Econ 7:249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puettmann ME, Wilson JB (2005) Life-cycle analysis of wood products: cradle-to-gate LCI of residential wood building materials. Wood Fiber Sci 37:18–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puettmann ME, Bergman R, Hubbard S, Johnson L, Lippke B, Oneil E, Wagner FG (2010) Cradle-to-gate life-cycle inventory of US wood products production: corrim phase I and phase II products. Wood Fiber Sci 42:15–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter K (2001) LCA—reuse/recycle. In: Johansson CJ, Pizzi T, van Leemput M (eds.) Wood adhesion and glued products, Report on the State of the Art of COST Action E13, p 161–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivela B, Hospido A, Moreira T, Feijoo G (2006a) Life cycle inventory of particleboard: a case study in the wood sector. Int J LCA 11(2):106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivela B, Moreira M, Muñoz I, Rieradevall J, Feijoo G (2006b) Life cycle assessment of wood wastes: a case study of ephemeral architecture. Sci Total Env 357(1–3):1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rivela B, Moreira T, Feijoo G (2007) Life cycle inventory of medium density fibreboard. Int J LCA 12(3):143–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saravia-Cortez A, Herva M, García-Diéguez C, Roca E (2013) Assessing environmental sustainability of particleboard production process by ecological footprint. J Cleaner Prod 52:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva D, Lahr F, Garcia R, Freire F, Ometto A (2013) Life cycle assessment of medium density particleboard (MDP) produced in Brazil. Int J LCA 18(7):1404–1411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SimaPro, SimaPro Analyst Indefinite, Ecoinvent v2, Product Ecology Consultants, PEC, Netherlands, (2009). www.pre.nl/default.htm

  • Suchsland O (2004) The swelling and shrinking of wood: a practical technology primer. Forest Products Society, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker S, Syme M, Foliente G (2009) Life cycle assessment of forest and wood products in Australia. N Z Timber Des J 17(4):3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M (2005) Energy and greenhouse gas emissions impacts of fuel ethanol. Center for Transportation Research Energy System Division, Argonne National Laboratory. NGCA Renewable fuels forum, the national Press club, 23 Aug 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner F, Richter K (2007) Wood building products in comparative LCA. A literature review. Int J LCA 12(7):470–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Youngquist JA (1999) Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison. General technical report FPL; GTR-113: 10.1-10.31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Andreja Kutnar would like to acknowledge the Slovenian Research Agency for financial support within the frame of the project Z4-5520.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreja Kutnar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kutnar, A., Hill, C. (2014). Assessment of Carbon Footprinting in the Wood Industry. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors, Volume 2. EcoProduction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-75-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics