Skip to main content

Applying a Multi-Agent Classifier System with a Novel Trust Measurement Method to Classifying Medical Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The 8th International Conference on Robotic, Vision, Signal Processing & Power Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 291))

  • 2025 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we present the application of a Multi-Agent Classifier System (MACS) to medical data classification tasks. The MACS model comprises a number of Fuzzy Min–Max (FMM) neural network classifiers as its agents. A trust measurement method is used to integrate the predictions from multiple agents, in order to improve the overall performance of the MACS model. An auction procedure based on the sealed bid is adopted for the MACS model in determining the winning agent. The effectiveness of the MACS model is evaluated using the Wisconsin Breast Cancer (WBC) benchmark problem and a real-world heart disease diagnosis problem. The results demonstrate that stable results are produced by the MACS model in undertaking medical data classification tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Shayea QK (2011) Artificial neural networks in medical diagnosis. Int J Comput Sci Issues (IJCSI) 8(2):150–154

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amato F, López A, Peña-méndez EM, Vaňhara P, Hampl A, Havel J (2013) Artificial neural networks in medical diagnosis. J Appl Biomed 11:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benaim M, Samuelides M (1991) Arigorous result about the off-line learning approximation. International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), vol 2, p 979

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bentahar J, Khosravifar B (2008) Using trustworthy and referee agents to secure multi-agent systems. The 5th international conference on information technology: new generations (ITNG), pp 477–482

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boukerche A, Li X (2005) An agent-based trust and reputation management scheme for wireless sensor networks. IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM), vol 3. p 5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7(1):1–26

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston, Longman Publishing Co., Inc, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta S, Sarkar A, Pramanik I, Mukherje B (2012) Implementation scheme for online medical diagnosis system using multi agent system with JADE. Int J Sci Res Publ 2(6):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hota HS (2013) Diagnosis of breast cancer using intelligent techniques. Int J Emerg Sci Eng (IJESE) 1(3):45–53

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khosravifar B, Gomrokchi M, Bentahar J, Thiran P (2009) Maintenance-based trust for multi-agent systems. International conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 2. pp 1017–1024

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mazurowski MA, Habas PA, Zurada JM, Lo JY, Baker JA, Tourassi GD (2008) Training neural network classifiers for medical decision making: the effects of imbalanced datasets on classification performance. Neural Netw 21(2–3):427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohammed MF, Lim CP, Quteishat A (2012) A novel trust measurement method based on certified belief in strength for a multi-agent classifier system. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-012-1245-2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mui L, Mohtashemi M, Halberstadt A (2002) A computational model of trust and reputation. Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), pp 2431–2439

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nakashima T, Uenishi T, Narimoto Y (2010) Off-line learning of soccer formations from game logs. IEEE conference on world automation congress (WAC), pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  15. Newman DJ, Asuncion A, Hettich S et al (2011) UCI repository of machine learning databases. Accessed, available at http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/, Last visit on 25 May 2013 [Online]

  16. Odeh SM, Khalil M (2011) Off-line signature verification and recognition: neural network approach. International symposium on innovations in intelligent systems and applications (INISTA), pp 34–38

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oprea M (2009) MEDICAL_MAS: an agent-based system for medical diagnosis medical diagnosisin. In: Iliadis L, Vlahavas I, Bramer M (eds) IFIP International federation for information processing, artificial intelligence applications and innovations III, vol 296. Springer, Boston, pp 225–232

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quteishat A, Lim CP, Saleh JM, Tweedale J, Jain LC (2011) A neural network-based multi-agent classifier system with a Bayesian formalism for trust measurement. Soft Comput 15(2):221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Quteishat A, Lim CP, Tweedale J, Jain LC (2009) A neural network-based multi-agent classifier system. Neurocomputing 72(7–9):1639–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shemshadi A, Soroor J, Tarokh MJ (2008) An innovative framework for the new generation of SCORM 2004 conformant e-learning systems. International conference on information technology: new generations, pp 949–954

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simpson PK (1992) Fuzzy min–max neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):776–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Simpson PK (1993) Fuzzy min–max neural networks—part 2: clustering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1(1):32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan SC, Lim CP, Tan KS, Navarro JC (2009) An evolutionary artificial neural network for medical pattern classification, lecture notes in computer science on neural information processing: part II, vol 5864. pp 475–482

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang P, Zhangz (2005) A computation trust model with trust network in multi-agent systems. International conference on active media technology (AMT), pp 389–392

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wu F, Zilberstein S, Chen X (2011) Online planning for multi-agent systems with bounded communication. Artif Intell 175(2):487–511

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Q, Shieh JS (2008) A multi-agent prototype system for medical diagnosis. 3rd international conference in intelligent system and knowledge engineering, vol 1. pp 1265–1270

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (No. PELECT/203/6711229) for supporting this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umi Kalthum bt Ngah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mohammed, M.F., Lim, C.P., bt Ngah, U.K. (2014). Applying a Multi-Agent Classifier System with a Novel Trust Measurement Method to Classifying Medical Data. In: Mat Sakim, H., Mustaffa, M. (eds) The 8th International Conference on Robotic, Vision, Signal Processing & Power Applications. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 291. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-42-2_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-42-2_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-4585-41-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-42-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics