Skip to main content

Reflections on Working with Communities and Community-Based Projects in Bangladesh

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
M² Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement

Abstract

Community-based studies are a central feature of current development and climate change research and planning in developing countries. In this chapter we reflect upon our engagement with place-based communities over two decades in rural Bangladesh. We draw upon several encounters with local communities to illustrate the relationship between communities of practice and of place; complexities of putting what local people say and do at the centre of project work; the relationship of policy to practice; the difficulties of balancing immediate gains with longer term sustainability; and the need to locate place-based communities within wider ecological, economic and political networks of activity and influence to ensure more effective planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rahman is a Bangladeshi environmentalist and community based natural resource management specialist who began his career in aquaculture while working for DANIDA, Caritas and FAO during 1983–1991, followed by work as a wetland ecologist with the Bangladesh Flood Action Plan in 1991–1994, and in community-based natural resources management (wetlands and forests) with various donor supported projects since 1994. His recent work has been on disaster management and climate change adaptation planning and management with USAID, DFID, UNDP, JICA, SDC, IUCN and Oxfam. He is currently pursuing PhD research into coastal communities’ perceptions and adaptation to climate change impacts in Bangladesh at Curtin University, WA.

    Pokrant is an Australian environmental anthropologist whose interest in natural resource management developed in the 1990s when he worked on the impact of British colonial rule on fisher communities in India, the organization and development of fisher communities in Bangladesh and West Bengal and the growth of an export-oriented shrimp industry in Bangladesh and its impact on rural communities.

  2. 2.

    ‘Common-pool resources (CPRs) are natural or human-made resources where one person’s use subtracts from another’s use and where it is often necessary, but difficult and costly, to exclude other users outside the group from using the resource’. Digitial Library of the Commons (Accessed April 20 2013. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/contentguidelines

  3. 3.

    The Flood Action Plan was a long term programme funded by the World Bank designed to protect floodplain and other populations from flooding. It consisted initially of 26 components and focused largely on ‘hard engineering’ solutions. For details of the Plan, see http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=477916&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000178830_98101904135218.

  4. 4.

    Free riding refers to: ‘…the act of freely using resources generated by another person without payment or even authorization…’ (Frischman 2013, p. 13).

  5. 5.

    Seine nets are used on beaches and on boats. They are long nets with or without bags that encircle an area where fish are found. They have been used for centuries among inland fishers in Bangladesh.

  6. 6.

    A Ramsar wetland is an ecosystem protected under the International Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, more commonly known as the Ramsar Convention. See http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-home/main/ramsar/1_4000_0.

References

  • Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (Eds.). (2001). Communities and the environment: Ethnicity, gender, and the state in community-based conservation. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angerbrandt, H., Lindstrom, L., & de la Torre-Castro, M. (2011). What is this thing called ‘community’ good for? In R. Chuenpagdee (Ed.), World small-scale fisheries: Contemporary visions. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 995–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1040(39), 15188–15193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw, T. (2009). Key concepts in community studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P. M. (2006). Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resources management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development, 34, 1942–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., & Von Hellermann, P. (Eds.). (2012). Multi-sited ethnography: Problems and possibilities in the translocation of research methods. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G. (2012). Community re-studies: Lessons and prospects. The Sociological Review, 60, 405–420. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02091.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensor, J., & Berger, R. (2009). Understanding climate change adaptation: Lessons from community-based approaches. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, K. (2012). Discordant development: Global capitalism and the struggle for connection in Bangladesh. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. S. (2010). Key principles of community-based natural resource management: A synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environmental Management, 45(1), 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Culture, power, place: Explorations in critical anthropology. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, I. (2011). WORLD HEALTH AND NEPAL. In D. Mosse, Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. (1973). Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 11, 61–89. doi:10.1017/S0022278X00008089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (Eds.). (2004). Participation--from tyranny to transformation?: Exploring new approaches to participation in development. London: Zed books.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization. (1972). Employment, incomes and equality: A strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory Culture Society, 27, 233–253. doi:10.1177/0263276409361497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, G. (1982). Development and underdevelopment in historical perspective: Populism, nationalism and industrialization. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCay, B., & Jentoft, S. (1998). Market or community failure? Critical perspectives on common property research. Human Organization, 57(1), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work? Washington, D.C: World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: General synthesis. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice. London and Ann Arbor: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (2011). Introduction: The anthropology of expertise and professionals in international development. In D. Mosse (Ed.), Adventures in aidland: The anthropology of professionals in international development. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2001). Reformulating the commons. In J. Burger, et al. (Eds.), Protecting the commons: A framework for resource management in the Americas (pp. 17–41). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J. P. (2004). Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Development and Change, 35(2), 223–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M., Capistrano, D. A., Minkin, S. F., Islam, A., & Halder, S. (1999). Experience of community managed wetland habitat restoration. In H. A. Middendrop, P. M. Thompson, & R. S. Pomroy (Eds.), Sustainable inland fisheries management in Bangladesh (pp. 111–121). Philippinnes: ICLARM Conference Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, H. (2009). Community-based adaptation to climate change. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1998). Weapons of the weak. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, A., & Roddick, A. P. (2012). Mobile Humanity: The Delocalization of Anthropological Research. Reviews in Anthropology, 41(4), 273–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S., De la Vega-Leinert, A. C., & Schultz, L. (2010). The role of community participation in the effectiveness of UNESCO biosphere reserve management: Evidence and reflections from two parallel global surveys. Environmental Conservation, 37(03), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. M. (2013). Sustainability of community-based organizations in Bangladesh. Society & Natural Resources, 26(7), 778–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. scholarsbank.uoregon.edu. Accessed 9 Jan 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. (2010). Elite capture or capture elites? Lessons from the ‘counter-elite’ and ‘co-opt-elite’ approaches in Bangladesh and Ghana, Working paper. World Institute for Development Economics Research, No. 2010, 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2013). 2013 Human development report. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environmental Programme. (2012). Global environmental outlook. New York: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiela, I. (2006). Global coastal change. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bob Pokrant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rahman, M., Pokrant, B. (2014). Reflections on Working with Communities and Community-Based Projects in Bangladesh. In: Tiwari, R., Lommerse, M., Smith, D. (eds) M² Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-11-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics