Abstract
Museums increasingly use interactive technologies to make a museum visit more rewarding. In this chapter, we present opportunities that tabletop environments offer for learning, enjoyment, motivation, collaboration and playful interaction in museums. We discuss experiments with a tabletop interface in a popular science museum. This museum is an open space where visitors walk around and interact with exhibits in various ways. We integrated a tabletop application in the existing museum context that allowed visitors, mostly children, to plan and personalize their visit in a playful way. Personalization was either done individually, in a pilot experiment, or in a small group, in the main experiment. The question to be answered was whether children who follow a personalized route through the museum enjoy the experience more, are more motivated, learn more, and are more collaborative than children who follow a route that was not personalized, individually or collaboratively. We did not find many differences between experimental conditions (personalized versus nonpersonalized groups) on enjoyment and collaboration, possibly due to the fact that our research setting resembled “in the wild” studies more than classical experiments. However, in one experiment we found a learning effect of personalization. Overall, scores on the enjoyment measures were high and the experiments gave rise to engaged behavior and playful interaction. We discuss implications of our work for the study of collaborative learning in tabletop environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
The complete questionnaire can be found in the user evaluation toolkit on the PuppyIR site (see http://www.puppyir.eu/results/user-evaluation-toolkit).
- 3.
References
Anderson D, Lucas KB, Ginns IS (2003) Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. J Res Sci Teach 40(2):177–199
Anstead E, Durrant A, Benford S, Kirk D (2012) Tabletop games for photo consumption at theme parks. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces, pp 61–70
Antle AN (2007) The CTI framework: informing the design of tangible systems for children. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, pp 195–202
Asai K, Kondo T, Kobayashi H, Sugimoto YY (2012) Browsing lunar surface using tabletop augmented reality at exhibit in science museum. J Inf Syst Educ 10(1):11–31
Aubusson P, Griffin J, Kearney M (2012) Learning beyond the classroom: implications for school science. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG, McRobbie CJ (eds) Second international handbook of science education. Springer, Netherlands, pp 1123–1134
Barranis NJ (2011) Altering user perceptions of applications: how system design can impact playfulness and anxiety. University of Illinois, Urbana
Bell G (2002) Making sense of museums: the museum as ‘cultural ecology’. Intel White Paper, pp 1–17. http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/library/. Accessed 02 June 2013
Bell MW, Smith-Robbins S, Withnail G (2010). This is not a game—social virtual worlds, fun, and learning. In: Peachey A et al (eds) Researching learning in virtual worlds. Human-computer interaction series. Springer, London, pp 177–191
Bieldt N (2012) Building a transformative museum? Getting to ‘Our Place’ through the creative industries lens: a case study from New Zealand. In: Kristiansen E (ed) The transformative museum—proceedings of the DREAM conference, May 2012, Roskilde University, Denmark, pp 1–14
Bundy AC (1993) Assessment of play and leisure: delineation of the problem. Am J Occup Ther 47(3):217–222
Dahl MI, Stuedahl D (2012) Transforming children’s participation and learning in museums: from singular dialogues to a multilayered explorative experience. In: Kristiansen E (ed) The transformative museum—proceedings of the DREAM conference, May 2012, Roskilde University, Denmark, pp 96–109
Damala A, Kockelkorn H (2006) A taxonomy for the evaluation of mobile museum guides. In: Proceedings of the 8th conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, pp 273–274
Dani DE, Koenig KM (2008) Technology and reform-based science education. Theor Pract 47(3):204–211
Dillenbourg P, Evans M (2011) Interactive tabletops in education. Int J Computer-Support Collab Learn 6(4):491–514
Dixon D (2009) Nietzsche contra Caillois: beyond play and games. In: The philosophy of computer games conference, University of Oslo
Dohse KC, Dohse T, Still JD, Parkhurst DJ (2008) Enhancing multi-user interaction with multi-touch tabletop displays using hand tracking. In: IEEE proceedings of first international conference on advances in computer-human interaction, pp 297–302
Eccles JS, Wigfield A (2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol 53(1):109–132
Fantuzzo J, Coolahan K, Mendez J, McDermott P, Sutton-Smith B (1998) Contextually-relevant validation of peer play constructs with African American Head Start children: Penn interactive peer play scale. Early Childhood Res Q 13(3):411–431
Fleck R, Rogers Y, Yuill N, Marshall P, Carr A, Rick J, Bonnett V (2009) Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces, pp 189–196
Forehand M (2005) Bloom’s taxonomy: original and revised. In: Orey M (ed) Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomy. Accessed 31 May 2013
Hall T, Bannon L (2005) Designing ubiquitous computing to enhance children’s interaction in museums. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM conference on interaction design and children, pp 62–69
Helsper EJ, Eynon R (2010) Digital natives: where is the evidence? Br Educ Res J 36(3):503–520
Henricks TS (2010) Caillois’s man, play, and games—an appreciation and evaluation. Am J Play 3(2):157–185
Hinrichs U, Carpendale S (2011) Gestures in the wild: studying multi-touch gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12 May 2011, pp 3023–3032
Hornecker E (2010) Interactions around a contextually embedded system. In: TEI 2010, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 25–27 Jan 2010, pp 169–176
Hornecker E, Nicol E (2011) Towards the wild: evaluating museum installations in semi-realistic situations. In: Proceedings of re-thinking technology in museums conference. http://www.ehornecker.de/Papers/HorneckerNicolFinal.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2013
Hornecker E, Marshall P, Rogers Y (2007) From entry to access: how shareability comes about. In: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces, pp 328–342
Hsi S (2003) A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum. J Comput Assist Learn 19(3):308–319
Iglesias CA, Garijo M, Santiago F (2009) A playful approach for learning intelligent systems in engineering. In: EAEEIE annual conference, 2009, pp 1–4
IJsselsteijn W, de Kort Y, Poels K, Jurgelionis A, Bellotti F (2007) Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. In: Proceedings of ACE 2007, Salzburg, Austria. http://www.yvonnedekort.nl/pdfs/ACE%202007%20workshop%20submission%20TUe%20final.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2013
Kangas M (2010) Creative and playful learning: learning through game co-creation and games in a playful learning environment. Thinking Skills Creativity 5(1):1–15
Karimi A, Lim YP (2010) Children, engagement and enjoyment in digital narrative. Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. In: Steel CH, Keppell MJ, Gerbic P, Housego S (eds) Proceedings of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education (ASCILITE), Sydney, pp 475–483
Karoulis A, Sylaiou S, White M (2006) Usability evaluation of a virtual museum interface. Informatica 17(3):363–380
Kearsley G, Shneiderman B (1999) Engagement theory: a framework for technology-based learning and teaching. http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm. Accessed 28 May 2012
Kidd J, Ntala I, Lyons W (2011) Multi-touch interfaces in museum spaces: reporting preliminary findings on the nature of interaction. In: Rethinking technology in museums: emerging experiences, University of Limerick
Koeffel C, Hochleitner W, Leitner J, Haller M, Geven A, Tscheligi M (2010) Using heuristics to evaluate the overall user experience of video games and advanced interaction games. In: Evaluating user experience in games. Springer, London, pp 233–256
Kotler N, Kotler P (2000) Can museums be all things to all people?: missions, goals, and marketing’s role. Mus Manage Curatorship 18(3):271–287
Krapp A (1999) Interest, motivation and learning: an educational-psychological perspective. Eur J Psychol Educ 14(1):23–40
Krathwohl DR (2002) A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theor Pract 41(4):212–218
Manches AD (2010) The effect of physical manipulation on children’s numerical strategies: evaluating the potential for tangible technology. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham
Marchetti E, Petersson Brooks E (2012a) From lecturing to apprenticeship; introducing play in museum learning practice. In: eLmL 2012, fourth international conference on mobile, hybrid, and on-line learning, pp 94–99
Marchetti E, Petersson Brooks E (2012b) Playfulness and openness: reflections on the design of learning technologies. In: ArtsIT 2011, LNICST 101. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 38–45
Marshall P (2007) Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? In: Proceedings of TEI’07. ACM, New York, pp 163–170
Marshall P, Morris R, Rogers Y, Kreitmayer S, Davies M (2011). Rethinking ‘multi-user’: an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems, May 2011, pp 3033–3042
Martin LMW (2004) An emerging research framework for studying informal learning and schools. Sci Educ 88 (Special Issue):71–82
Martocchio JJ, Webster J (1992) Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Pers Psychol 45(3):553–578
McAuley E, Tammen VV (1989) The effects of subjective and objective competitive outcomes on intrinsic motivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol 11(1):84–93
McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV (1989) Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 60(1):48–58
Meisner R, vom Lehn D, Heath C, Burch A, Gammon B, Reisman M (2007) Exhibiting performance: co-participation in science centres and museums. Int J Sci Educ 29(12):1531–1555
Meneses R, Ortega R, Navarro J, de Quijano SD (2008) Criteria for assessing the level of group development (LGD) of work groups groupness, entitativity, and groupality as theoretical perspectives. Small Group Res 39(4):492–514
Michael D, Pelekanos N, Chrysanthou I, Zaharias P, Hadjigavriel LL, Chrysanthou Y (2010) Comparative study of interactive systems in a museum. In: Digital heritage. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 250–261
O’Brien HL, Toms EG (2008) What is user engagement? a conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 59(6):938–955
O’Malley C, Stanton Fraser D (2004) Literature review in learning with tangible technologies. Futurelab, Bristol, Report 12
Pedretti E (2002) T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: critical conversations and new directions in science centres and science museums. Stud Sci Educ 37(1):1–41
Perloy LM (2011) The influence of personalization on education and enjoyment in a museum. Master thesis, Human Media Interaction, Twente University, Enschede
Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants: part 1. On the Horiz 9(5):1–6
Price S, Pontual Falcão T (2011) Where the attention is: discovery learning in novel tangible environments. Interact Comput 23:499–512
Price S, Rogers Y, Scaife M, Stanton D, Neale H (2003) Using ‘tangibles’ to promote novel forms of playful learning. Interact Comput 15(2):169–185
Quistgaard N, Kahr-Højland A (2010) New and innovative exhibition concepts at science centres using communication technologies. Mus Manage Curatorship 25(4):423–436
Read JC, MacFarlane S (2002) Endurability, engagement and expectations: measuring children’s fun. In: Proceedings of the 2002 conference on interaction design and children, IDC’02. ACM, New York, NY, pp 1–23
Reeve J (1989) The interest-enjoyment distinction in intrinsic motivation. Motiv Emot 13(2):83–103
Rogers CS, Impara JC, Frary RB, Harris T, Meeks A, Semanic-Lauth S, Reynolds M (1998) Measuring playfulness: development of the child behaviors inventory of playfulness. Play Cult Stud 1:121–135
Rogers Y, Scaife M, Gabrielli S, Smith H, Harris E (2002) A conceptual framework for mixed reality environments: designing novel learning activities for young children. Presence: Teleop Virtual Environ 11(6):677–686
Roussou M (2010) Learning by doing and learning through play: an exploration of interactivity in virtual environments for children. In: Parry R (ed) Museums in a digital age. Routledge, London, pp 247–265
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78
Schiefele U (1991) Interest, learning, and motivation. Educ Psychol 26(3/4):299–323
Shernoff DJ, Csikszentmihalyi M, Schneider B, Shernoff ES (2003) Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. Sch Psychol Q 18(2):158–176
Streng S (2009) The role of personal and shared displays in scripted collaborative learning. In: Gross T et al (eds) INTERACT 2009, Part II, LNCS 5727, pp 876–879
Takatalo J, Häkkinen J, Kaistinen J, Nyman G (2007) Measuring user experience in digital gaming: theoretical and methodological issues. In: Electronic imaging 2007, international society for optics and photonics, 649402, pp 1–13
Takatalo J, Häkkinen J, Kaistinen J, Nyman G (2010) Presence, involvement, and flow in digital games. In: Evaluating user experience in games. Springer, London, pp 23–46
Teague R, De Jesus K, Ueno MN (2001) Concurrent vs. post-task usability test ratings. In: CHI’01 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 289–290
Tuddenham P, Robinson P (2007) Distributed tabletops: supporting remote and mixed-presence tabletop collaboration. In: TABLETOP’07, second annual IEEE international workshop on horizontal interactive human-computer systems, pp 19–26
University of Rochester (n.d.). Intrinsic motivation inventory. http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/questionnaires/10-questionnaires/50. Accessed 2 Dec 2011
Van Dijk EM, Lingnau A, Kockelkorn H (2012) Measuring enjoyment of an interactive museum experience. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction, pp 249–256
Van Dijk EMAG, van der Sluis F, Perloy LM, Nijholt A (2014) A user experience model for tangible interfaces for children. International Journal of Arts and Technology, Special Issue on Expressive Interactive Systems for Arts and Entertainment (selected contributions from Intetain 2011), to appear
Vom Lehn D, Hindmarsh J, Luff P, Heath C (2007) Engaging constable: revealing art with new technology. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1485–1494
Wakkary R, Hatala M (2007) Situated play in a tangible interface and adaptive audio museum guide. Pers Ubiquit Comput 11(3):171–191
Walker K, Fróes I (2011) The art of play: exploring the roles of technology and social play in museums. In: Beale K (ed) Museums at play: games, interaction and learning. Museums Etc, Edinburgh. http://www.lkl.ac.uk/kevin/play.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2013
Xie L, Antle AN, Motamedi N (2008) Are tangibles more fun?: comparing children’s enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, pp 191–198
Yager SE, Kappelman LA, Maples GA, Prybutok VR (1997) Microcomputer playfulness: stable or dynamic trait? ACM SIGMIS Database 28(2):43–52
Yelland N (2011) Reconceptualising play and learning in the lives of young children. Australas J Early Childhood 36(2):4–12
Zuckerman O, Arida S, Resnick M (2005) Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI’05. New York, NY, pp 859–868
Acknowledgments
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013 under grant agreement n° 231507 and from the Pieken in de Delta project (number PID092064) SEA (Smart Experience Actuator).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Dijk, B., Lingnau, A., Vissers, G., Kockelkorn, H. (2014). Individual and Collaborative Personalization in a Science Museum. In: Nijholt, A. (eds) Playful User Interfaces. Gaming Media and Social Effects. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-96-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-96-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-95-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-96-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)