Abstract
Individual in-depth interviews were conducted with fourteen selected students who are enrolled in a specialized arts secondary school (School of the Arts) in Singapore to discern whether they experience flow as they each engage in their respective art forms (visual arts, dance, music, and theater). Qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts revealed that elements of flow were emergent among the fourteen teacher-nominated adolescents who are talented both in the arts and their academics. The study also explores the environmental supports that facilitate expressions of artistic inclinations and identities within the Singapore context. Implications for arts-educators and artist-practitioners are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37, 165–182.
Chang, T. C., & Lee, W. K. (2003). Renaissance city Singapore: A study of arts spaces. Area, 35(2), 128–141.
Cheng, M. (2008). Information technology, art education, and creativity in Singapore. In L. Joubert (Ed.), Educating in the arts – The Asian experience: Twenty-four essays (pp. 147–162). Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.
Chong, S. (1998). Policies affecting arts education: The heart of the matter. Arts Education Policy Review, 99(3), 22–26.
Chong, T. (2005). From global to local: Singapore’s cultural policy and its consequences. Critical Asian Studies, 37(4), 553–568.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education International.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1996). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ee, J., Tan, O. S., & Ng, A. K. (2007). Styles of creativity: Adaptors and innovators in a Singapore context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3), 364–373.
Fatt, J. P. T. (2000). Fostering creativity in education. Education, 120(4), 744–757.
Gunzenhauser, M. G. (2006). A moral epistemology of knowing subjects: Theorizing a relational turn for qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(1), 621–627.
Ho, P. S., & Chong, S. N. Y. (2008). A study on the factors influencing the talent development of a musically gifted adolescent in Singapore using Gagne’s DMGT-based analysis. Australian Journal of Music Education, 1, 7–17.
Hogan, D., & Gopinathan, S. (2008). Knowledge management, sustainable innovation, and pre-service teacher education in Singapore. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 369–384.
Keun, L. L. H. P. (2006). Creative dance: Singapore children’s creative thinking and problem-solving responses. Research in Dance Education, 7(1), 35–65.
Lee, T. (2004). Creative shifts and directions. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10, 281–299.
Merrick, E. (1999). An exploration of quality in qualitative research. In M. Kopala & L. Suzuki (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in psychology (pp. 25–36). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Ministry of Education [MOE]. (1999). Towards ability-driven education, 1999 work plan seminar, 4 September.
Ministry of Information and the Arts [MITA]. (2000). Renaissance city report: Culture and the arts in Renaissance Singapore, MITA, Singapore. Retrieved September 28, 2008, from http://app.mica.gov.sg/Portals/0/2_FinalRen.pdf
Ministry of Information, Communication and the Arts (MICA). (2008). Renaissance City Plan III. MITA, Singapore. Retrieved September 1, 2010, from http://app.mica.gov.sg/Data/0/Renaissance%20City%20Plan%20III%20(Bk%201).pdf
National Arts Council. (n.d.). Arts education programmes online. Available online at http://www.nac.gov.sg/aep/
Niu, W. (2006). Development of creativity research in Chinese societies: A comparison of mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore. In J. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 374–394). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults: Their development and education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press, Inc.
Reynolds, F. C., & Piirto, J. (2005). Depth psychology and giftedness. Finding the soul in Gifted Education. Roeper Review, 27(3), 165–172.
Reynolds, F. C., & Piirto, J. (2007). Honoring and suffering the thorn: Marking, naming and eldering, depth psychology II. Roeper Review, 29, 48–53.
Rostan, S. M., Pariser, D., & Gruber, H. E. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the development of artistic talent, creativity, and giftedness. High Ability Studies, 13(2), 125–155.
Subotnik, R. (2002). The Juilliard model for developing young adolescent performers: An educational prototype. In C. F. M. Van Lieshout & F. M. Cornelis’ (Eds.), Developing talent across the lifespan (pp. 249–276). New York: Psychology Press.
Tan, A. (1998). Exploring educator roles in cultivating creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 8(1), 67–84.
Tan, A. (2001a). Everyday classroom learning activities and implications for creativity education: A perspective from the beginning teachers’ experiences. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 11(2), 23–36.
Tan, A. (2001b). Singaporean teachers’ perception of activities useful for fostering creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(2), 131–148.
Tan, A., & Law, L. (2000). Teaching creativity: Singapore’s experiences. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 10(1), 79–96.
Tan, A., & Law, L. (2002). Activities useful for fostering creativity: Singaporean children views. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 12(2), 59–74.
Tan, A., & Rasidir, R. (2006). An exploratory study on children’s views of a creative teacher. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 16(2), 17–28.
Tan, A.-G., Ho, V., & Yong, L.-C. (2007). Singapore high school students’ creativity efficacy. New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 96–106.
Wu, E. H. (2005). Factors that contribute to talented performance: A theoretical model from a Chinese perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(30), 231–270.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A. Semi-structured Interview Guide
Appendix A. Semi-structured Interview Guide
-
1.
Could you tell me about your (music, art, dance, theater)? How long have you been doing your (music, art, dance, theater)?
-
2.
Could you describe to me what the experience is like when you are engaging in your [art form] (dance, music, etc)? How do you feel whenever you engage in your art form?
-
3.
How often do you practice? How often do you do your drawings (for visual arts)/rehearse for theater/dance/music? How about during vacations?
-
4.
What do you think are some of the things that contributed to your development in your art area? How about some of the things which you feel do not help you in developing your art form?
-
5.
Tell me about your first year in SOTA. What was it like?
-
6.
How different or similar is the school from your previous schools?
-
7.
Describe to me what your teachers here are like. How about the kind of training and education that you receive in your art form here, what is it like?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garces-Bacsal, R.M. (2013). Finding Flow in Artistic Skill and Technique: Narratives of Young Artists-in-Training in Singapore. In: Lum, CH. (eds) Contextualized Practices in Arts Education. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-55-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-55-9_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-54-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-55-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)