Skip to main content

Revitalising Education: Site Based Education Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Changing Practices, Changing Education

Abstract

In this chapter, we briefly revisit the key themes and ideas of the book before picking up the argument that: (1) that education always occurs in local sites and that changing education, no matter how it is imposed or encouraged, always sets in train processes of ‘site based education development’; and, (2) that a theoretical, practical and critical orientation towards site based education development can serve as the vehicle for revitalising education and re-invigorating the students, teachers and school and system leaders who live and work together in the communicative spaces of education. We argue that the notion of site ontologies, fundamental to our ontological view of practices, is crucial in theoretical, political and practical terms. On this view, practices like education occur in sites, amid particular kinds of arrangements to be found there, and changing education requires changing not only educational practices but also the practice architectures that make them possible. Our empirical work has led us to the notion of site based education development, by which we mean the development of the practices and practice architectures of education in every site in which education is practised. Since education always occurs within particular sites, changing education, no matter how it is imposed or encouraged, must always set in train processes of local, site based education development if change is to be effected and secured. We think that the notion of site based education is especially important in an era of schooling: an era of standardised curricula, professional teaching standards, and high-stakes external assessments. In an era of schooling, site based education development has the potential to be a powerful vehicle for revitalising education and re-invigorating educational practices and practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is as if some of the curriculum developers of the 1970s and ‘80s, especially in the US, saw themselves as gods animating the worlds they imagined. Perhaps when they thought of the importance of their words, they had in mind the opening verse of the St James translation of the Gospel according to St John, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” Perhaps they thought they occupied a similar location in relation to the teachers and students whose work they sought to form. In any case (to switch religions), like Icarus, they flew too close to the Sun.

References

  • Aristotle. (2003). Ethics (trans: [1953] Thompson, J. A. K., revised with notes and appendices [1976] Hugh Tredennick, with an introduction [1976, 2003] Jonathan Barnes, and preface [2003] A. C. Grayling). London: The Folio Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. (2007). Educational research as a practical science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(3), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power and liberation. London: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S. & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (trans: Rehg, W.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, P. (2001). The inner citadel: The meditations of Marcus Aurelius (trans: Chase, M.). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I., Rönnerman, K., Moksnes Furu, E., Salo, P., & Forsman, L. (2010). Professional development policy and politics across international contexts: From mutuality to measurability? Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 18(1), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson, P. (2006). Stuck in structures? The integration process of basic education as a change challenge for the municipal school organisation [Rakenteissa kiinni? Perusopetuksen yhtenäistämisprosessi kunnan kouluorganisaation muutoshaasteena]. PhD Thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Faculty of Education, Chydenius Institute – Kokkola University Consortium. [Chydenius-instituutin tutkimuksia 4/2006.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2001). Educational research and evaluation: Opening communicative space. Australian Educational Researcher, 28(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559–604, 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, P., & Ax, J. (2009). Action research and pedagogy as science of the child’s upbringing. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 324–335). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W. A. (1978). Thinking about the curriculum: The nature and treatment of curriculum problems. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2000). The activist professional. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2000). The social bearing of nature. Inquiry, 43(1), 21–37. doi: 10.1080/002017400321352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham, Md: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2012). A primer on practices. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice based education (pp. 13–26). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum, School Review, 78, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). Introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Kemmis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., Bristol, L. (2014). Revitalising Education: Site Based Education Development. In: Changing Practices, Changing Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics