Abstract
This chapter explores how educational practice was formed, re-formed and transformed through practices of researching in our case study sites. We position research in this chapter within an emerging tradition of researching practice from within practice traditions, where we take seriously the movement towards educational research becoming the domain of those who inhabit the practice itself. In focusing on practitioner research in this way, we challenge, or offer a supplement to, the long-standing domination of externally driven research. Hence, the chapter is located within the realm of a developing practice tradition that contributes to educator-driven, educator-directed and educator-led arrangements and which, in turn, we argue, nurture informed and strategic change. Teacher practitioners organise themselves in deliberate and strategic ways to ask critical questions of their practice and to act on these answers to re-form and transform practices in a cycle of critical reflection, planning, action and critique. As we observed it in the schools we studied, this critical and self-critical research enabled teacher-researchers and leader-researchers to understand the lived-ness of their practice. In our study, we observed different kinds of researching practices that were sometimes in dynamic tension with one another in a school site. We outline these and also show how practices of researching in our case study sites were differentiated from, but also contributed to, practices of leading, professional learning, teaching and student learning. We argue that researching practices occurred in the case study schools as part of a strategic, deliberate approach for educational change and note how it contributed to site based education development in these sites.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. London: Allen Lane.
Carr, W. (2007). Educational research as a practical science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(3), 271–286.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Routledge.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York: D.C. Health & Company.
Edwards-Groves, C. (1998). Reconceptualisation of classroom events as structured lessons: Documenting and changing the teaching of literacy in the primary school. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Griffith University, Australia.
Edwards-Groves, C. (2003). On task: Focused literacy learning. Newtown, Syd: Primary English Teaching Association.
Edwards-Groves, C. (2008). The praxis-oriented self: Continuing (self-) education. In S. Kemmis & T. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 127–148). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Ellis, N. J., & Armstrong, A. C. (2013). How context shapes practitioner research and professional learning in Singapore and NSW. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2013.767674.
Hara, N. (Ed). (2009). Communities of practice: Fostering peer-to-peer learning and informal knowledge sharing in the workplace. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Kemmis, S. (2007). Action research as a practice-changing practice. Opening address for the IV Congreso Internacional Sobre Investigación-Acción Participativa. University of Valladolid, Spain.
Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research: A practice-based practice. Educational Action Research Journal, 17(3), 463–474.
Kemmis, S. (2010). Research for praxis. Pedagogy, culture and society (Special issue on ‘Pedagogy, Education and Praxis’), 18(1), 9–27.
Kemmis, S. (2012). Researching educational praxis: Spectator and participant perspectives. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 885–905. (2012). doi: org/10.1080/01411926.2011.588316.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559–604, 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: Routledge.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Loughran J. J., Mitchell, I. J., & Mitchell, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Learning from teacher research. New York: Teachers College Press.
Porter, A., & Brophy, J. (1988). Synthesis of good teaching: Insights from the work of the institute for research on teaching. Educational leadership, 45, 8.
Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Stenhouse, L. (1979). The problem of standards in illuminative research. Scottish Educational Review, 11(1), 5–10.
Valli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 67–88.
van Manen, M. (1995). On the epistemology of reflective practice. Teachers and Teaching, 1(1), 33–50.
Wilkinson, J., Olin, A., Lund, T., & Stjernstrom, E. (2013). Understanding leading as travelling practices. School Leadership and Management. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2013.773886
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., Bristol, L. (2014). Researching as a Practice-Changing Practice. In: Changing Practices, Changing Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-46-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-47-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)