Abstract
Literature on educational change has warned that students play an important role in determining the success of educational reforms. Whatever reform is planned, reformers have to remember that the reform should not be in serious conflict with students’ learning culture. Therefore, to ensure the possibility of highly successful cooperative learning reforms in CHC classrooms, this chapter aims to investigate disjunctions between cooperative learning principles and CHC students’ learning culture. Based on perspectives about cultural change and findings of relevant empirical studies, the chapter argues that to keep CHC students interested in adopting cooperative learning, some cooperative learning principles should be modified to match unchangeable/hard-to-change cultural values of CHC students. The chapter points out three potential disjunctions between cooperative learning principles and CHC students’ learning culture including mixed-ability grouping versus friendship grouping, role-rotating grouping vs. leader-led grouping and intra-peer assessment versus inter-peer assessment. The chapter finally reports an empirical study that examined Vietnamese students’ responses to these mismatches and suggested that in the CHC context the principle of forming mixed-ability groups recommended by cooperative learning researchers should be replaced by friendship groups, the role-rotating grouping concept should change to leader-led grouping, and intergroup peer assessment should be given priority over intragroup peer assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrami, P., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., DeSimone, C., d’Apollonia, S., & Howden, J. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Montreal: Harcourt Brace.
Burns, R. B. (1991). Study and stress among first year overseas students in an Australian University. Higher Education Research and Development, 10(1), 61–77.
California Department of Education. (1994). Handbook for teaching Vietnamese-speaking students. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
Chauvet, M., & Batchford, P. (1993). Group composition and national curriculum assessment at seven years. Educational Research, 35(2), 189–196.
Cohen, G. E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.
Cohen, E., & Intili, J. A. (1982). Interdependence and management in bilingual classrooms (Final report), Stanford University California, Centre for Educational Research at Stanford.
Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A., & Wu, M. (1993). Peer assessment of an individual’s contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 45–56.
Corbett, D., & Wilson, B. (1995). Make a difference with, not for, students: A plea to researchers and reformers. Educational Researcher, 24(June/July), 12–17.
Day, D., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 857–880.
Dickson, M., Den-Hartog, D., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 729–768.
Doel, M., & Sawdon, C. (2001). What makes for successful groupwork? A survey of agencies in the UK. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 437–463.
Earl, S. (1986). Staff and peer assessment-measuring an individual’s contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(1), 60–69.
Farivar, S., & Webb, N. M. (1998). Preparing teachers and students for cooperative work: Building communication and helping skills. In C. M. Brody & N. Davidson (Eds.), Professional development for cooperative learning: Issues and approaches (pp. 169–188). Albany: State University of New York.
Ferraro, G. P. (1994). The cultural dimension of international business (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Fraysse, J. (1994). Combined effects of friendship and stage of cognitive development on interactive dynamics. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155(2), 161–177.
Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London/New York/Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Fulop, M., & Ross, A. (2007). Competition and cooperation in schools: An English, Hungarian, and Slovenian comparison. In M. Salili & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Culture, motivation, and learning: A multicultural perspective (pp. 235–284). Charlotte: IAP.
Garfield, J. (1993). Teaching statistics using small-group cooperative learning. Journal of Statistics Education, 1(1). http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v1n1/garfield.html. Accessed on 22 Jan 2008.
Gillies, R. (2007). Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Glazer, S. (2006). Social support across cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(5), 605–622.
Goldfinch, J. (1994). Further developments in peer assessment of group projects. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19(1), 29–35.
Harshbarger, B., Ross, T., Tafoya, S., & Via, J. (1986). Dealing with multiple learning styles in the ESL classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of teachers of English to speakers of other language, San Francisco.
Hofstede, G. (2003). Cultures and organisation-software of the minds. London: Profile Books.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, J. (2005). Cultures and organization-software of the minds (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(2), 225–248.
Irwin, H. (1996). Communicating with Asia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
James, D. L. (1995). The executive guide to Asian Pacific communications: Doing business throughout Asia and the Pacific. Singapore: Allen and Unwin.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone. London: Allyn and Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Holubec, E. J., & Roy, P. (1984). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40, 99–121.
Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2005). Grouping of pupils in secondary school classrooms: Possible links between pedagogy and learning. Social Psychology of Education, 8(4), 349–374.
Liang, X. (1998). Dilemmas of cooperative learning: Chinese students in a Canadian school. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The Faculty of Graduate Studies, The University of British Columbia.
Luo, Y., Duerring, E., & Byham, W. (2008). Leadership success in China: An expatriate’s guide. Washington Pike, Bridgeville: DDI Press.
McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178.
Melles, G. (2004). Understanding the role of language/culture in group work through qualitative interviewing. The Qualitative Report, 9(2), 216–240.
Millis, B. J., & Cottell, P. G. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Phoenix: American Council on Education and the Oryx Press.
Mitchell, S. N., Reilly, R., Bramwell, F. G., Sonosky, A., & Lilly, F. (2004). Friendship and choosing groupmates: Preferences for teacher-selected vs. student-selected groupings in high school science classes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(1), 20–32.
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113–131.
Ng, C.-H. (2009). Reforming learning in the Asia-Pacific region: An introduction. In C.-H. Ng & P. D. Renshaw (Eds.), Reforming learning: Concepts, issues and practice in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 3–21). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.
Park, C. C. (2000). Learning style preferences of Southeast Asian students. Urban Education, 35(3), 245–268.
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451–461.
Phuong-Mai, N. (2008). Culture and cooperation cooperative learning in Asian Confucian heritage cultures: The case of Viet Nam. Utrecht: IVLOS Institute of Education of Utrecht University.
Sabatier, P. A., & Mazmanian, A. D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560.
Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 31–54.
Sama, L. M., & Papamarcos, S. D. (2000). Culture’s consequences for working women in corporate America and Japan, Inc. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 7(2), 18–29.
Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(2), 139–155.
Scollon, S. (1999). Not to waste words or students: Confucian and Socratic discourse in the tertiary classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 13–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sharp, S. (2006). Deriving individual student marks from a tutor’s assessment of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 329–343.
Slavin, R. (1991). Are cooperative learning and “untracking” harmful to the gifted? Response to Allan. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 68–71.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. London: Allyn and Bacon.
Spreitzer, G. M., Perttula, K. H., & Xin, K. (2005). Traditionality matters: An examination of the effectiveness of transformational leadership in the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26(3), 205–227.
Tang, C., & Biggs, J. (1996). How Hong Kong students cope with assessment. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences (pp. 159–181). Hong Kong: CERC and ACER.
Thanh-Pham, T. H., & Gillies, R. (2010). Designing a culturally appropriate format of formative peer assessment for Asian students: The case of Vietnamese students. International Journal of Educational Reform, 19(2), 72–85.
Triandis, H. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley.
Vang, T. (1999). Hmong-American students: Challenges and opportunities. In C. Park & M. Chi (Eds.), Asian-American education: Prospects and challenges (pp. 219–236). Westport: Greenwood.
Watson, S. B., & Marshall, J. E. (1995). Heterogeneous grouping as an element of cooperative learning in an elementary education science course. School Science and Mathematics, 95(8), 401–405.
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.
Yueh, J., & Alessi, S. M. (1988). The effect of reward structures and group ability composition on cooperative computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15(1), 18–22.
Zajac, R. J., & Hartup, W. W. (1997). Friends as co-workers: Research review and classroom implications. Elementary School Journal, 98(1), 3–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thanh, P.T.H. (2014). Learning Culture of CHC Students: Its Support and Challenge to Cooperative Learning. In: Implementing Cross-Culture Pedagogies. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 25. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-91-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-91-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4451-90-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-4451-91-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)