Skip to main content

Teach Less, Learn More: Lost in Translation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Education Innovation Series ((EDIN))

Abstract

This chapter analyses how the Teach Less, Learn More (TLLM) initiative was translated into operational frameworks for implementation in schools and classrooms. It is found that substantive considerations of the “what” (content) and “why” (purpose) of teaching fundamental to TLLM have faded away in the translation process, overshadowed by largely technical concerns about the “how” of teaching driven by the imperative of meeting the needs of learners. Invoking the German Didaktik tradition, the chapter argues that TLLM is a quintessential curricular idea which has to do with the “what” and “why” of teaching, and is inexorably associated with historically-rich curricular and educational thinking and discourses. The chapter concludes by discussing the reasons for the loss of the “what” and “why” questions in the translation of TLLM and surfaces key insights about curriculum translation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biesta, G. (2005). Against learning: Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 25(1), 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, M.F. (2011). Joseph Schwab, curriculum, curriculum studies and educational reform. Paper presented at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contu, A., Grey, C., & Örtenblad, A. (2003). Against learning. Human Relations, 56(8), 931–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. (2009). The formation of a school subject and the nature of curriculum content: An analysis of liberal studies in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(5), 585–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. (2010). Curriculum transformation in the era of reform initiatives: The need to rethink and re-conceptualize content. Journal of Textbook Research, 3(2), 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. (2011). Revisiting curriculum potential. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(5), 538–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. (2012). Teach less, learn more: Reclaiming a curricular idea. In J. Tan (Ed.), Education in Singapore: Taking stock, looking forward (pp. 17–31). Singapore: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of world making. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsdottir, S., Reinertsen, A., & Nordtømme, N.P. (2000). Klafki’s Didaktik analysis as a conceptual framework for research on teaching. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 319–334). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundem, B. B. (2000). Understanding European didactics. In B. Moon, M. Ben-Peretz, & S. Brown (Eds.), Routledge international companion to education (pp. 235–262). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, T. W. (2006). Understanding and shaping curriculum: What we teach and why. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. (2009). Toward a 21st century pedagogy for Singapore. A presentation to the Principals’ Curriculum Forum on Assessment-Pedagogy Nexus, Ministry of Education, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. (2011). Culture and pedagogy in Singapore: An institutionalist account of the fate of the teach less learn more policy initiative. Paper presented at the 4th Redesigning Pedagogy: Transforming Teaching, Inspiring Learning International Conference, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common cores of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, S. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, W. V. (2000). Theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–61). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2010). Research for praxis: Knowing doing. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klafki, W. (2000). Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 139–159). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, R. A. (2008). The significance of the concepts “elemental” and “fundamental” in didactic theory and practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(2), 215–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L. (2004). Our future of opportunity and promise. Address by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on 22 August at the 2004 National Day Rally at the University Cultural Centre, National University of Singapore. Singapore Government Press Release.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2009). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2004). What is teach less, learn more? Retrieved 13 June 2012, from http://www3.moe.edu.sg/bluesky/tllm.htm/

  • Ministry of Education. (2006a). The teach less, learn more framework [Image]. Retrieved 13 June 2012, from http://www.challenge.gov.sg/magazines/archive/2006_09/creative/creative.html

  • Ministry of Education. (2006b). Together, reaching ‘TLLM heaven’: Recommendations for TLLM. Retrieved 13 June 2012, from http://www.challenge.gov.sg/magazines/archive/2006_09/creative/creative.html

  • Ministry of Education. (2007a). The PETALS™ primer. Singapore: Ministry of Education and Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (Singapore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007b). The PETALS™ framework [Image]. Retrieved 13 June 2012, from http://officialtllm.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/petals-framework.pdf

  • Ministry of Education. (2008a). More support for school’s “Teach less, learn more” initiatives, [Press Release]. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2008b). Features of the TLLM ignite! package [Brochure]. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P. (1996). The Hong Kong school curriculum: Development, issues and policies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. T. (2008). Educational reform in Singapore: From quantity to quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 81(4), 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2008a). The marketisation of education in Singapore. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Thinking schools, learning nation: Contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 19–38). Singapore: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. (2008b). Rethinking TLLM and its consequential effects on assessment. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Thinking schools, learning nation: Contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 246–257). Singapore: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C., & Abbas, D. B. (2009). The ‘Teach Less, Learn More’ initiative in Singapore: New pedagogies for Islamic religious schools? KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 6(1), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. S., Ee, J., Lee, Y. P., & Lam, K. (Eds.). (2007). Teach less, learn more (TLLM) school-based curriculum innovation: Research reports. Singapore: Ministry of Education and Educational Research Association of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharman, S. (2005). Achieving quality: Bottom up initiative, top down support. Speech by Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Minister for Education, on 22 September at the MOE Work Plan Seminar 2005 at the Ngee Ann Polytechnic Convention Centre, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulich, R. (1947/1954). Three thousand years of educational wisdom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might Didaktik teach curriculum. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15–39). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juin Ee Teo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Teo, J.E., Deng, Z., Lee, C.KE., Lim-Ratnam, C. (2013). Teach Less, Learn More: Lost in Translation. In: Deng, Z., Gopinathan, S., Lee, CE. (eds) Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-57-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics