Abstract
This chapter analyses how the Teach Less, Learn More (TLLM) initiative was translated into operational frameworks for implementation in schools and classrooms. It is found that substantive considerations of the “what” (content) and “why” (purpose) of teaching fundamental to TLLM have faded away in the translation process, overshadowed by largely technical concerns about the “how” of teaching driven by the imperative of meeting the needs of learners. Invoking the German Didaktik tradition, the chapter argues that TLLM is a quintessential curricular idea which has to do with the “what” and “why” of teaching, and is inexorably associated with historically-rich curricular and educational thinking and discourses. The chapter concludes by discussing the reasons for the loss of the “what” and “why” questions in the translation of TLLM and surfaces key insights about curriculum translation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Biesta, G. (2005). Against learning: Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 25(1), 54–66.
Connelly, M.F. (2011). Joseph Schwab, curriculum, curriculum studies and educational reform. Paper presented at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Contu, A., Grey, C., & Örtenblad, A. (2003). Against learning. Human Relations, 56(8), 931–952.
Deng, Z. (2009). The formation of a school subject and the nature of curriculum content: An analysis of liberal studies in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(5), 585–604.
Deng, Z. (2010). Curriculum transformation in the era of reform initiatives: The need to rethink and re-conceptualize content. Journal of Textbook Research, 3(2), 93–113.
Deng, Z. (2011). Revisiting curriculum potential. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(5), 538–559.
Deng, Z. (2012). Teach less, learn more: Reclaiming a curricular idea. In J. Tan (Ed.), Education in Singapore: Taking stock, looking forward (pp. 17–31). Singapore: Pearson.
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of world making. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Gudmundsdottir, S., Reinertsen, A., & Nordtømme, N.P. (2000). Klafki’s Didaktik analysis as a conceptual framework for research on teaching. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 319–334). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gundem, B. B. (2000). Understanding European didactics. In B. Moon, M. Ben-Peretz, & S. Brown (Eds.), Routledge international companion to education (pp. 235–262). London: Routledge.
Hewitt, T. W. (2006). Understanding and shaping curriculum: What we teach and why. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hogan, D. (2009). Toward a 21st century pedagogy for Singapore. A presentation to the Principals’ Curriculum Forum on Assessment-Pedagogy Nexus, Ministry of Education, Singapore.
Hogan, D. (2011). Culture and pedagogy in Singapore: An institutionalist account of the fate of the teach less learn more policy initiative. Paper presented at the 4th Redesigning Pedagogy: Transforming Teaching, Inspiring Learning International Conference, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common cores of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124.
Hopmann, S. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456.
Humboldt, W. V. (2000). Theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–61). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kemmis, S. (2010). Research for praxis: Knowing doing. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1), 9–27.
Klafki, W. (2000). Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 139–159). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Krüger, R. A. (2008). The significance of the concepts “elemental” and “fundamental” in didactic theory and practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(2), 215–250.
Lee, H.L. (2004). Our future of opportunity and promise. Address by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on 22 August at the 2004 National Day Rally at the University Cultural Centre, National University of Singapore. Singapore Government Press Release.
Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2009). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Ministry of Education. (2004). What is teach less, learn more? Retrieved 13 June 2012, from http://www3.moe.edu.sg/bluesky/tllm.htm/
Ministry of Education. (2006a). The teach less, learn more framework [Image]. Retrieved 13 June 2012, from http://www.challenge.gov.sg/magazines/archive/2006_09/creative/creative.html
Ministry of Education. (2006b). Together, reaching ‘TLLM heaven’: Recommendations for TLLM. Retrieved 13 June 2012, from http://www.challenge.gov.sg/magazines/archive/2006_09/creative/creative.html
Ministry of Education. (2007a). The PETALS™ primer. Singapore: Ministry of Education and Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (Singapore).
Ministry of Education. (2007b). The PETALS™ framework [Image]. Retrieved 13 June 2012, from http://officialtllm.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/petals-framework.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2008a). More support for school’s “Teach less, learn more” initiatives, [Press Release]. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2008b). Features of the TLLM ignite! package [Brochure]. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Morris, P. (1996). The Hong Kong school curriculum: Development, issues and policies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Ng, P. T. (2008). Educational reform in Singapore: From quantity to quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(1), 5–15.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 81(4), 501–522.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Tan, J. (2008a). The marketisation of education in Singapore. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Thinking schools, learning nation: Contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 19–38). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Tan, K. (2008b). Rethinking TLLM and its consequential effects on assessment. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Thinking schools, learning nation: Contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 246–257). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Tan, C., & Abbas, D. B. (2009). The ‘Teach Less, Learn More’ initiative in Singapore: New pedagogies for Islamic religious schools? KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 6(1), 25–39.
Tan, O. S., Ee, J., Lee, Y. P., & Lam, K. (Eds.). (2007). Teach less, learn more (TLLM) school-based curriculum innovation: Research reports. Singapore: Ministry of Education and Educational Research Association of Singapore.
Tharman, S. (2005). Achieving quality: Bottom up initiative, top down support. Speech by Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Minister for Education, on 22 September at the MOE Work Plan Seminar 2005 at the Ngee Ann Polytechnic Convention Centre, Singapore.
Ulich, R. (1947/1954). Three thousand years of educational wisdom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might Didaktik teach curriculum. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15–39). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teo, J.E., Deng, Z., Lee, C.KE., Lim-Ratnam, C. (2013). Teach Less, Learn More: Lost in Translation. In: Deng, Z., Gopinathan, S., Lee, CE. (eds) Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-57-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-57-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4451-56-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-4451-57-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)