Skip to main content

A Vortex Modeling with 3D CFD

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Hydroinformatics

Part of the book series: Springer Hydrogeology ((SPRINGERHYDRO))

  • 1822 Accesses

Abstract

Until now, the fine representations of the complex hydraulic phenomena such as Vortex rely on physical modeling for industrial purposes. EDF has been testing the 3D CFD code “Flow 3D©” for free surface flow simulation since five years. The main difficulty of using finite elements programs is the relevance and the stability of their numerical results. EDF decided to test in the field of vortex how reliable Flow 3D is. Flow 3D is a commercial CFD code using VOF method with a rectangular mesh. In this study, it is assumed that flow is liquid water with an interface simulated by VOF method. This study is based on a schematic hydraulic experimental model realized in the EDF-R&D laboratory. The chosen case is a simple configuration of a vertical downward drain hole. The basin is one meter length and around a half meter width. The water level is fixed, and the flow rate is adjustable. The main advantage of this experiment is that the geometry is easy to simulate with 3D CFD software. In this configuration, it is ensured that a vortex phenomenon exists and that it is stable during experimentations. An aerated vortex with no air flow rate has been chosen for the validation case. The aerated vortex length reaches the basin bottom. The first goal of the 3D CFD simulation is to check whether Flow 3D© is able to represent a vortex when it physically exists. The second objective is to find the simplest set of CFD parameters that represents the vortex as it appears in the physical experimentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. De Siervi, F., Viguier, H.C., Greitzer, E.M., & Stan, C.S. (1982). Mechanisms of inlet-vortex formation. Journal of Fluid Mechanic, 124, 173–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levi, E. (1991). Vortices in hydraulics. Journal of Hydraulics Engineering, 117(4), 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunt, J.C.R., Wray, A.A., Moin, P. (1998). Eddies,stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Centre for Turbulence Research Report CTR-S88, 193.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jain, A.K., Ranga Raju, K.G., & Garde, R.J. (1978). Vortex formation at vertical pipe intakes. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 104(10), 1429–1445.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Padmanabhan, M., & Hecker, G.E. (1984). Scale effects in pump sump models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110(11), 1540–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. AFNOR (2009). Fascicule de documentation de l’AFNOR n° FD CEN/TR 13930. Pompes rotodynamiques: conception des ouvrages d’aspiration: recommandations d’installation des pompes.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ANSI (1998). Pump intake design. American National Standard Institute ANSI/HI 9.8-1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tokyay, T.E., Constantinescu, S.G. (2005). Large eddy simulation and reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of flow in a realistic pump intake: A validation study. Impacts of global climate change (pp. 1–12). doi:10.1061/40792(173)423

  9. Minisci, E., Telib, H., Cicatelli, G. (2005). Hydraulic design validation of the suction intake of a vertical centrifugal pump station, by use of computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis. Proceeding of the ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting and Exhibition, Houston, USA, June 19–23 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chong, M.S., Perry, A.E., & Cantwell, B.J. (1990). A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields. Journal Physics of Fluids, A2(5), 408–420.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Levy, Y., Degani, D., & Seginer, A. (1990). Graphical visualization of vertical flows by means of helicity. AIAA Journal, 28(8), 1347–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong, J., & Hussain, F. (1995). On the identification of a vortex. Journal Fluid Mechanic, 285, 69–94.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grégory Guyot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guyot, G., Maaloul, H., Archer, A. (2014). A Vortex Modeling with 3D CFD. In: Gourbesville, P., Cunge, J., Caignaert, G. (eds) Advances in Hydroinformatics. Springer Hydrogeology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-42-0_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics