Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of Lipman’s Philosophy for Children Programme on Promoting Children’s Critical Thinking in Hong Kong, China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Childhood, Philosophy and Open Society

Part of the book series: Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects ((EDAP,volume 22))

Abstract

Although the Philosophy for Children (commonly known as P4C) programme has proved successful at enhancing the intellectual development of children in many parts of the world, the questions of whether children can do philosophy and whether P4C can foster children’s critical thinking have not hitherto been the focus of research in Hong Kong, China. This chapter reports the results of the first systematic, though only exploratory, study that assesses the effectiveness of the P4C programme in promoting children’s critical thinking in Hong Kong. Forty-two Secondary 1 students volunteered for this study, from whom 28 students were randomly selected and randomly assigned to two groups of 14 each: one receiving P4C lessons and the other receiving English lessons. The students who were taught P4C were found to show a greater improvement in the reasoning test performance than those who were not, to be capable of doing philosophy, and to have a positive attitude towards doing philosophy in the classroom. It was also found that P4C played a major role in developing the students’ critical thinking, and that such crucial factors as the following contributed to the success of the P4C programme: providing a favourable physical setting for discussion, adopting mixed-code teaching, using effective pedagogic strategies, integrating P4C into the formal curriculum, establishing a closely knit community of inquiry, maintaining good discipline in the community of inquiry, and giving after-class individual counselling to students who repeatedly display disruptive or negative emotional behaviours in class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, T. L. (1988). Doing philosophy with children. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 7(3), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. (1965). Visual thinking. In G. Kepes (Ed.), Education of vision (pp. 1–15). London: Studio Vista.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. B. (1987). Evaluating thinking skills in the classroom. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 221–247). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, S. (2000). Language socialisation and the construction of socio-moral meanings. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billings, L., & Fitzgerald, J. (2002). Dialogic discussion and the Paideia Seminar. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 907–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J., & Haste, H. (1987). Introduction. In J. Bruner & H. Haste (Eds.), Making sense: The child’s construction of the world (pp. 1–25). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K. (1992). Lying and truthfulness: Children’s definitions, standards, and evaluative reactions. Child Development, 63, 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, R., & Denton, P. (1996). Causal understanding as a developmental primitive. Developmental Review, 16, 162–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, P. J. M. (2000). Thinking skills and early childhood education. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2001). Learning to learn: Life-long learning and whole-person development. Hong Kong: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, M.-F., Lafortune, L., Pallascio, R., Splitter, L., Slade, C., & De la Garza, T. (2005). Modeling the development process of dialogical critical thinking in pupils aged 10 to 12 years. Communication Education, 54(4), 334–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1996). Meditations on first philosophy: With selections from the objections and replies (Rev. ed., J. Cottingham, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreisbach, C. (2000). Dreams in the history of philosophy. Dreaming, 10(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (1994). The feasibility of moral education. In M. Lipman & A. M. Sharp (Eds.), Growing up with philosophy (pp. 157–173). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (1998). Teaching thinking: Philosophical enquiry in the classroom. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O. (2000). Dreaming souls: Sleep, dreams, and the evolution of the conscious mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1992). Cognitive development: Past, present, and future. Developmental Psychology, 28, 998–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, R. (1991). The thinking log: The inking of our thinking. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (Rev. ed., Vol. 1, pp. 232–242). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (2003). Thinkers or doers? The Philosophers’ Magazine, 24, 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Moriyón, F., Rebollo, I., & Colom, R. (2005). Evaluating Philosophy for Children: A meta-analysis. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(4), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, M. (1994). Metaphysics and children. In M. Lipman & A. M. Sharp (Eds.), Growing up with philosophy (pp. 131–144). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higa, W. R. (1980). Philosophy for Children in Hawaii: A quantitative evaluation. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 2(1), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children. (1987). Philosophy for Children 1987. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 7(1), S1–S24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children. (1995). Philosophy for Children: A report of achievement. Upper Montclair, NJ: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (1993). 1990-1991 evaluation report of Philosophy for Children in Hawaii. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 10(4), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K. (1994). The philosophical disposition in children. In M. Lipman & A. M. Sharp (Eds.), Growing up with philosophy (pp. 38–39). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (1986). Philosophy for Children programme at a Gloucestershire comprehensive school in Great Britain. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 6(3), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (1999). Philosophy for Children and the reconstruction of philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 30, 338–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (2004). The philosopher as teacher: The role of a facilitator in a community of philosophical inquiry. Metaphilosophy, 35(5), 744–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, R. F. (1990). Do children think philosophically? Metaphilosophy, 21, 416–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, Y. L. (2008). Critical thinking of Chinese students: Conceptualization, assessment and instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lien, C. M. (2004). Making sense of evaluation of P4C. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(1 & 2), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1982). Harry Stottlemeier’s discovery (Rev. ed.). Upper Montclair, NJ: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S. (Eds.). (1984). Philosophical inquiry: An instructional manual to accompany Harry Stottlemeier’s discovery (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, F. (2005). Thomas Reid and philosophy with children. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39, 599–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. B. (1980). Philosophy and the young child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. B. (1984). Dialogues with children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. B. (1994). The child as natural philosopher. In M. Lipman & A. M. Sharp (Eds.), Growing up with philosophy (pp. 63–77). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, C. (1989). Young children generate philosophical ideas. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 8(2), 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKim, R. H. (1980). Thinking visually: A strategy manual for problem solving. Parsippany, NJ: Dale Seymour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. B. (1986). How to win over a skeptic. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 6(3), 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, F. Y. (2007). Critical thinking in Hong Kong secondary school English language classrooms: The case of five teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murris, K. (1992). Beetle crushers lift the lid on mindless behavior. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 10(2), 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murris, K. (2000). Can children do philosophy? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, D. L. (1994). On the concrete origin of ultimate metaphysical questions in childhood. In M. Lipman & A. M. Sharp (Eds.), Growing up with philosophy (pp. 121–130). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, S. G. (1995). Yes, teacher, first graders can do philosophy. In J. P. Portelli & R. F. Reed (Eds.), Children, philosophy, and democracy (pp. 249–262). Alberta, Canada: Detselig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pálsson, H. (1996). We think more than before about others and their opinions: An evaluation report from Iceland. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 12(4), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1953). The dialogues of Plato (4th ed., Vol. 3, B. Jowett, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. (2003). Seeing and visualizing: It’s not what you think. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, A. (1995). Philosophy. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy (pp. 666–670). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznitskaya, A. (2005). Empirical research in Philosophy for Children: Limitations and new directions. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(4), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, S. (2006). Developing thinking and understanding in young children: An introduction for students. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Lockl, K., & Fernandez, O. (2005). Interrelationships among theory of mind, executive control, language development, and working memory in young children: A longitudinal analysis. In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Eds.), Young children’s cognitive development: Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind (pp. 259–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodian, B. (2005). Theory of mind – The case for conceptual development. In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Eds.), Young children’s cognitive development: Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind (pp. 95–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Splitter, L. J., & Sharp, A. M. (1995). Teaching for better thinking: The classroom community of inquiry. Melbourne, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolstoy, L. (1994). My encounter with philosophical ideas. In M. Lipman & A. M. Sharp (Eds.), Growing up with philosophy (pp. 25–28). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1994). Wonder, puzzlement, and perplexity. In M. Lipman & A. M. Sharp (Eds.), Growing up with philosophy (pp. 77–84). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). ‘Philosophy for Children’: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Hickling, A. K., & Schult, C. A. (2000). Young children’s psychological, physical, and biological explanations. In K. Lee (Ed.), Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings (pp. 267–288). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2005). The curriculum and the child: The selected works of John White. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). The blue and brown books (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1974a). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell & Mott, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1974b). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J. (2000). Can Aristotelian logic be translated into Chinese: Could there be a Chinese Harry Stottlemeier? Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(04), 1448A (UMI No. 9968064).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, China

    Chi-Ming Lam

Authors
  1. Chi-Ming Lam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lam, CM. (2013). An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of Lipman’s Philosophy for Children Programme on Promoting Children’s Critical Thinking in Hong Kong, China. In: Childhood, Philosophy and Open Society. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 22. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-06-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation