Advertisement

Personal Epistemology and Its Relationship with Creativity

  • Ji ZhouEmail author
  • Jiliang Shen
  • Detlef Urhahne
Chapter

Abstract

A total of 135 undergraduates in China were investigated by questionnaires on their creativity and personal epistemology. Results showed the characteristics of their personal epistemology and its relationship with creativity. Chinese undergraduates considered knowledge as uncertain, improvable, and complex and considered learning speed as gradual and learning ability as incremental. They tended to use objective evidence and tend to categorize knowledge. However, they could use limited methods to justify them. Some dimensions of personal epistemology were correlated with creativity. High-creativity individuals tended to consider knowledge as more uncertain, improvable, complex, and influenced by subjective and situational factors. They tended to use objective evidences and more justification skills. They also categorized knowledge and considered learning speed as gradual and learning ability as incremental, but the degree was less than low-creativity ones. The epistemological characteristics of high-creativity students indicated that they were more on a higher developmental stage of personal epistemology.

References

  1. Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benack, S., Basseches, M., & Swan, T. (1989). Dialectical thinking and adult creativity. In G. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 199–208). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  4. Braten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 539–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer, K. W., & Pipp, S. L. (1984). Processes of cognitive development: Optimal level and skill acquisition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 45–80). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Hofer, B. K. (2004). Introduction: Paradigmatic approaches to personal epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofer, B. K. (2007, April). Learning strategies and epistemic beliefs: Cultural influences in Japan and the US. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Hofer, B. K. (2008). Personal epistemology and culture. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 3–22). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promotion intellectual growth and critical thinking, in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moore, W. S. (2002). Understanding learning in a postmodern world: Reconsidering the Perry scheme of intellectual and ethical development. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 17–36). Mahwah, HJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74, 317–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paletz, S. B. F., & Peng, K. (2009). Problem finding and contradiction: Examining the relationship between naïve dialectical thinking, ethnicity, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Perry, W. (1968). Pattern of development in thought and values of students in a liberal arts college: A validation of a schema. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
  15. Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  16. Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Qian, G., & Pan, J. (2002). A comparison of epistemological beliefs and learning from science text between American and Chinese high school students. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 365–385). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shen, J., Hu, W., & Lin, C. (2002). Constructing of the scientific creativity test for adolescent. 青少年科学创造力测验的编制 [Constructing of the Scientific Creativity Test for Adolescent]. 心理发展与教育 [Developmental and Educational Psychology], 18, 76–81.Google Scholar
  20. Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
  21. Youn, I. (2000). The culture specificity of epistemological beliefs about learning. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang, L. F. (1999). A comparison of U.S. and Chinese university students’ cognitive development: The cross-cultural applicability of Perry’s theory. Journal of Psychology, 133, 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universitaet of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Developmental PsychologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Division of Elementary SchoolMinistry of EducationBeijingChina
  4. 4.Institute of EducationMartin-Luther-UniversityHalle-WittenbergGermany

Personalised recommendations