Advertisement

Creativity Self-Efficacy and Its Correlates

  • Ai-Girl TanEmail author
  • Tianchang Li
  • Heinz Neber
Chapter

Abstract

Five hundred and forty-five Chinese students participated in the study aimed to examine multidimensionality of creativity self-efficacy and its personal (e.g. personality) and contextual (e.g. classroom environment) correlates. Nearly all aspects in the Big Five model (openness, extraversion, conscientious and agreeableness) were found to have significant, positive correlations with creativity self-efficacy. It was inconclusive if mastery approach or performance approach was a good predictor of creativity self-efficacy. Individualistic value was better than collectivistic value as a predictor of various dimensions of creativity self-efficacy. Students high in creativity self-efficacy scored higher in after-school academic, group activities and entertainment than their low creativity self-efficacious counterparts did.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). The genesis of creative greatness: Mini-c and the expert-performance approach. High Ability Studies, 18, 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2&3), 187–199.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Elliot, J. A., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Creative thinking and problem solving in gifted education. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  13. Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 915–981). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112–1142.Google Scholar
  15. Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helson, R. (1999). Creative mathematicians. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (pp. 311–330). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  17. Hill, A., Tan, A. G., & Kikuchi, A. (2008). International high school students’ creativity self-efficacy. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 18(1), 105–116.Google Scholar
  18. King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and five factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McMullan, W. E. (1978). Creative individuals: Paradoxical personages. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McNatt, D. B., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Boundary conditions of the Galatea effect: A field experiment and constructive replication. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 550–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore, R. M. (1997). The positive effects of cohesion on the creativity of small groups. International Social Science Review, 72(3/4), 84–93.Google Scholar
  23. Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sternberg, J. R., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Tan, A. G. (2007). Creativity self-efficacy Scale. Singapore: Unpublished.Google Scholar
  28. Tan, A. G., Ho, V., Ho, E., & Ow, S. (2008). High school students’ perceived creativity self-efficacy and emotions in a service learning context. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 18(2), 115–126.Google Scholar
  29. Tierney, P. A., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Triandis, H. T. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Zha, P. J., Walczyk, J. J., Griffith-Ross, D. A., & Tobacyk, J. J. (2006). The impact of culture and individualism–collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of psychologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universitaet of MunichMunichGermany
  3. 3.Department of Educational SciencesUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  4. 4.Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU)MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations