Advertisement

Creativity and Problem-Based Learning (PBL): A Neglected Relation

  • Heinz NeberEmail author
  • Birgit J. Neuhaus
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses about the relationship between creativity and problem-based learning or PBL. According to them, PBL is a complex approach to design and conduct instruction. It can be used for different purposes. PBL can contribute to the acquisitions of self-regulatory and reasoning skills of the students. It supports the development of strategies for productive reasoning and creative thinking for generating knowledge by solving instructional problems. The article states components of the instructional environment of PBL that contribute to achieve this goal. It reports on studies which measured the contribution of PBL to the development of creative thinking. It presents recommendations that will be derived for further strengthening the integrative approach to fostering creativity.

Keywords

Creative Process Instructional Method Divergent Thinking Creative Product Learning Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adams, K. (2006). The sources of innovation and creativity. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and Economy.Google Scholar
  2. Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 3, 18–23.Google Scholar
  3. Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Creativity and the classroom: from pitfalls to potential. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp. 101–115). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2011). Problem-based learning and argumentation: Testing a scaffolding framework to support middle-school students’ creation of evidence based arguments. Instructional Science, 39, 667–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng, V. M. Y. (2010). Teaching creative thinking in regular science lessons: Potentials and obstacles in three different approaches in an Asian context. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11, 17.Google Scholar
  6. Chin, C., & Chin, L. G. (2004). Problem-based learning: Using student’s questions to drive knowledge construction. Science Education, 88, 707–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, D. G., Sugioka, H. L., & Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (1999). Supportive classroom environments for creativity in higher education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Flieth, D. S., Renzulli, J. S., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Effects of a creativity training program on divergent thinking abilities and self-concept in monolingual and bilingual classrooms. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doyle, W., & Carter, K. (1984). Academic tasks in classroom. Curriculum Inquiry, 14, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallagher, S. A. (2005). Adapting problem-based learning for gifted students. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 285–311). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
  12. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Ghassib, H. B. (2010). Where does creativity fit into a productivist industrial model of knowledge production? Gifted and Talented International, 25, 13–20.Google Scholar
  14. Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75, 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 48–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Holton, D., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Pfeffer, M. G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28, 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ishii, N., Suzuki, Y., Fujiyoshi, H., Fujii, T., & Kozawa, M. (2007). A framework for designing and improving learning environments fostering creativity. Rivistra Semestral da Associacao Brasileira de Psycologia Escolar e Educational, 11, 59–69.Google Scholar
  20. Kaartinen, S., & Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Collaborative inquiry and the construction of explanations in the learning of science. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 189–212.Google Scholar
  21. Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lambros, A. (2004). Problem-based learning in middle and high school classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  24. Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, H., & Cho, Y. (2007). Factors affecting problem finding depending on degree of structure of problem situation. The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lubart, T. J. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 189–331). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Maker, C. J., Muammar, O., Serino, L., Kuang, C. C., Mohamed, A., & Sak, U. (2006). The discover curriculum model: Nurturing and enhancing creativity in all children. Korean Journal of Educational Policy, 3, 99–121.Google Scholar
  28. Neber, H. (2008). Epistemic questions: Fostering knowledge-generation by the students. The International Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 18, 7–20.Google Scholar
  29. Neber, H. (2011). Discovery learning. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  30. Neber, H., & Heller, K. A. (2002). Evaluation of a summer-school program for highly gifted secondary school students: The German pupil`s academy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neber, H., & Neuhaus, B. (2011). Problem-based learning. In H. E. Vidergor, C. R. Harris, & T. S. Yamin (Eds.), The practical handbook for teaching gifted and able learners. Paris: Hogrefe France.Google Scholar
  32. Pease, M. A., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Experimental analysis of the effective components of problem-based learning. Science Education, 95, 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Plucker, J. A., & Nowak, J. (2000). Creativity in science for K-8 practitioners: Problem-based approaches to discovery and invention. In M. D. Lynch & C. R. Harris (Eds.), Fostering creativity in children, K-8 (pp. 145–158). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  34. Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pyryt, M. C. (1999). Effectiveness of training children’s divergent thinking: A meta-analytic review. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. M. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth (pp. 351–365). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
  36. Ripple, R. E. (1999). Teaching creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 629–638). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  37. Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saunders Wickes, K. N., & Ward, T. B. (2009). Creative cognition in gifted youth. In I. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 381–396). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Characteristics of problems for problem-based learning: the student’s perspective. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5, 6–33.Google Scholar
  42. Spangler, M., Neber, H., & Neuhaus, B. (2010). Problem-based learning in biology teacher education. Unpublished manuscript, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  43. Tan, O. S. (Ed.). (2008). Problem-based learning and creativity. Singapore: CENGAGE Learning Asia.Google Scholar
  44. Tan, A.-G. (2010). Creativity across cultures and disciplines. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity in business and education (pp. 3–11). Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  45. Torrance, P. (2011). Future problem solving program international: Catalyst for talent recognition and development. Melbourne, FL: Future Problem Solving Program International Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, B. (2003). Creative problem solving (CPS version 6.1 TM ). A contemporary framework for managing change. Buffalo, NY: Creative Problem Solving Group (www.cpsb.com).Google Scholar
  47. Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Rikers, R. M. J. P., Te Winkel, W. W. R., & Van den Hurk, M. M. (2006). On the necessity of student-generated learning issues: An experimental approach. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem-based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3, 12–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walsh, A. (2005). The tutor in problem-based learning: A novice’s guide. Hamilton, CN: McMaster University, http://www-fhs,mcmaster.ca/facdev/tutorPBL.pdfGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, H.-C., Rose, C. P., & Chang, C.-Y. (2011). Agent-based dynamic support for learning from collaborative brainstorming in scientific inquiry. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 371–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Werner, C., Cao, G., Tang, M., Tumasjan, A., Shi, J., Shen, J., & Spörrle, M. (2010). This is not about art, it’s about work: Comparing Chinese to Germans regarding creative performance on the basis of job-related verbal tasks. In A. G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity in business and education (pp. 97–115). Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  52. Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K-12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1157–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yeo, J. W. (2008). Incorporating thinking tools to enhance facilitation of problem-based learning. Master thesis, International Center for Studies in Creativity. Buffalo, NY: Buffalo State University.Google Scholar
  54. Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). What students learn in problem-based learning: A process analysis? Instructional Science. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9181-6.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational SciencesUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU)MunichGermany
  3. 3.Department of biological sciencesLudwig-Maximilians-University (LMU)MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations