Advertisement

Transitional Gaps and Resilience in Japan

  • Makio TairaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reviews a study on resilience and school transition gaps in Japan. The author developed an inventory: school diagnosis chart. The participants were 119 secondary school freshmen. The author categorized participants into three groups according to their change of metacognitive ability: the uptrend, the same, and the downtrend. The downtrend group was overconfident in their metacognitive judgments as compared to the uptrend group. The former did not judge their weak points from the start of their school year. The participants who evaluated their metacognitive abilities from the lowest among the three groups improved to a moderate metacognitive ability level. They became efficient students in terms of metacognitive judgments at the end of the school year. The group-oriented factor, metacognitive ability, and higher-order learning strategies contributed positively to the study motivation of math. Good use of higher-order learning strategies contributed to “academic resilience” which could prevent them from losing motivation to study.

Keywords

Learning Strategy Secondary School Student School Violence Mixed Design ANOVA Metacognitive Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderman, E. M., Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131–147.Google Scholar
  2. Benese (2006). Cooperation between primary and secondary school. VIEW21, 9 http://benesse.jp/berd/center/open/chu/view21/2006/09/c03chal_01.html. Last accessed on 21 Feb 2012.
  3. Catterall, J. (1998). Risk and resilience in student transitions to high school. American Journal of Education, 106(2), 302–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cizek, G. J., & Burg, S. S. (2005). Addressing test anxiety in a high-stakes environment: Strategies for classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  5. Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ichikawa, S. (2008). Study support in cognitive-counseling. Bulletin of Annual Conference of Japan Educational Psychology, 49, 30–31 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  7. Jindal-Snape, D., & Miller, D.J. (2008). A challenge of living? Understanding the psycho-social processes of the child during primary-secondary transition through resilience and self-esteem theories. Educational Psychology Review , 20, 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Muto, T. (2007). Bridging between primary and secondary, its future. Instruction and Assessment, 67(2), 4–8 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  10. Nishibayashi, K. (1994). Full of errors in learning theory. Tokyo, Japan: Shinyosya (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  11. Sano, K. (2006). Whole school approach to conquer the transitional gap. In K. Kojima & K. A. Sano (Eds.), Programme to overcome transitional gaps (pp. 26–35). Tokyo, Japan: Meiji-tosho (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. Taira, M. (2008). Development of school diagnosis chart. Bulletin of Annual Sendai Educational Board, 13, 189–195 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  13. Taira, M. (2009a). An analysis of transitional gap between primary school and secondary school by using school diagnosis chart (1). Bulletin of Annual Sendai Educational Board, 190–194 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  14. Taira, M. (2009b). The trend of teaching and learning research in Japan. Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, 48, 115–122 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  15. Taira, M. (2010). An analysis of transitional gap between primary school and secondary school by using school diagnosis chart (2). Bulletin of Annual Sendai Educational Board: Report of Students’ Scholastic Ability, 201–205 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  16. Taira, M., & Leong, C. H. (in press). The role of cramming for examinations and its impact on the use of learning strategies: A comparison between Japanese students and Singaporean students. In U. Kim & Y-S. Park (Eds.), Asias educational miracle: Psychological, social and cultural perspectives. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. A. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101–122.Google Scholar
  18. Weinstein, C. E. (1982). Training students to use elaboration learning strategies. Educational Psychology, 7, 301.311.Google Scholar
  19. Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727–747). San Diego, CA: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Weinstein, C. E., & Meyer, D. K. (1994). Learning strategies, teaching and testing. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 3335–3340). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Weinstein, C.-E., Schulte, A., & Palmer, D. (1987). Learning and study strategies inventory (LASECOUNDARY SCHOOLI). Clearwater, FL: H&H Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Wormeli, R. (2010). Movin’ up to the middle. Educational Leadership, 67(7), 48–53.Google Scholar
  23. Yajima, Y. (2006). An action programme to conquer transitional gaps in Math. In K. Kojima & K. A. Sano (Eds.), Programme to overcome transitional gaps (pp. 114–122). Tokyo, Japan: Meiji-Tosho (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  24. Yip, M. C. W. (2009). Differences between high and low academic achieving university students in learning and study strategies: A further investigation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zeedyk, M. S., Gallacher, J., Henderson, M., Hope, G., Husband, B., & Lindsay, K. (2003). Negotiating the transition from primary to secondary school perceptions of pupils, parents and teachers. School Psychology International, 24(1), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationMiyagi University of EducationSendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations