Abstract
Group goal setting is a common leadership strategy that is used to improve work motivation, creativity, and excellent performance in organizations. The author tried to answer two important questions: (1) Why do challenging group goals improve group performance? (2) Are there any important (pre)conditions for group goal-setting techniques to be effective? To learn more about potential mediators of group goal setting, they investigated cognitive process variables (e.g., individual problem solving) and team motivation variables (e.g., group identification) that could function as a causal mechanism. To learn more about potential moderator variables, they analyzed the impact of task difficulty and the fairness of a supervisor in negotiating performance goals with the team.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antoni, C. (2005). Management by objectives – An effective tool for teamwork? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 174–184.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.
Cropanzano, R., & Schminke, M. (2001). Using social justice to build effective work groups. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 143–172). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., & Wiechmann, D. (2004). A multiple-goal, multi-level model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1035–1056.
Durham, C. C., Locke, E. A., Poon, J. M. L., & McLeod, P. L. (2000). Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, information seeking, strategy and performance. Human Performance, 13, 115–138.
Erez, M., & Somech, A. (1996). Is group productivity loss the rule or the exception? Effects of culture and group based motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1513–1537.
Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87–106.
Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2006). Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1037–1052.
Haslam, S. A., Wegge, J., & Postmes, T. (2009). Are we on a learning curve or a treadmill? The benefits of participative group goal setting become apparent as tasks become increasingly challenging over time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 430–446.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.
Johnson, D. M. (1966). Solution of anagrams. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 371–384.
Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807.
Karau, S. J., Markus, M. J., & Williams, K. D. (2000). On the elusive search for motivation gains in groups: Insights from the collective effort model. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 31, 179–190.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706.
Kerr, N., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 22.1–22.32.
Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Alge, B. J. (1999). Goal commitment and the goal setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 885–896.
Knight, D., Durham, C. C., & Locke, E. A. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implication, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 326–338.
Kozlowski, S. W., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77–124.
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist, 12, 290–300.
Locke, E. A. (2000). Motivation, cognition and action: An analysis of studies on task goals and knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 408–429.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 265–268.
Neubert, M. J. (1998). The value of feedback and goal setting over goal setting alone and potential moderators of this effect: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 11, 321–335.
O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285–1301.
Podsakoff, P. M., Bommer, W. H., Podsakoff, N. P., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 113–142.
Reicher, S. D., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC Prison Experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 1–40.
Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. (2003). Interpersonal treatment, social identity and organizational behavior. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 155–171). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Tan, A. G. (Ed.). (2010). Creativity in business and education: Interdisciplinary and intercultural aspects. Singapore: COS.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.
van Knippenberg, D., De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, B. (2007). Leadership and fairness: The state of the art. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 113–140.
Wegge, J. (2000). Participation in group goal setting: Some novel findings and a comprehensive model as a new ending to an old story. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 498–516.
Wegge, J., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). Improving work motivation and performance in brainstorming groups: The effects of three group goal setting strategies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 400–430.
Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 307–334.
Winters, D., & Latham, G. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group and Organization Management, 21, 236–250.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wegge, J., Haslem, S.A. (2013). When Group Goal Setting Fails: The Impact of Task Difficulty and Supervisor Fairness. In: Tan, AG. (eds) Creativity, Talent and Excellence. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-93-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-93-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4021-92-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-4021-93-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)