Advertisement

Creating an Innovative Team: The Promise of Team Diversity

  • Meir ShemlaEmail author
  • Dominika Dej
  • Jürgen Wegge
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores a theme related to organizational excellence: creating an innovative team. The authors pose a question: What can ensure that the positive effects of team diversity on innovation outweigh the drawbacks frequently found to be associated with diversity? They define diversity. They consider primary theories underlying organizational diversity: information processing, social categorization, and similarity-attraction. They review the contingency approach to diversity research, which currently guides the majority of work in the field. Finally, they introduce a contingency model of diversity and innovation that comprises three central groups of moderators that determine and shape the impact of diversity in teams on team innovation.

References

  1. Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Naquin, C. (2000). Group learning in organizations. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 369–411). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking – Does the composition of the top team make a difference. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., & Spell, C. S. (2009). Reviewing diversity training: Types of programs, and the differences they make. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  4. Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A., & Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams. A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 31, 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 554–594). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Chugh, D., & Brief, P. A. (2008). Introduction: Where the sweet spot is: Studying diversity in organizations. In A. P. Brief (Ed.), Diversity at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, W. M. (2010). Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 129–213). North-Holland: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & Mcleod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic-group cultural-differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1154–1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ely, R. J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1189–1199. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2004). Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 675–702. doi: 10.1002/Job.265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jehn, K. A., Lindred, L. G., & Rupert, J. (2008). Diversity, conflict, and their consequences. In A. P. Brief (Ed.), Diversity at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 77–89. doi: 10.1037/A0013077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kilgour, M. (2006). Improving the creative process: Analysis of the effects of divergent thinking techniques and domain specific knowledge on creativity. International Journal of Business & Society, 7, 79–107.Google Scholar
  22. Klein, K. J., Knight, A. P., Ziegert, J. C., Lim, B.-C., & Saltz, J. L. (2011). When team members’ values differ: The moderating role of team leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114, 125–136. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp. 2010.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Meyer, B., Shemla, M., & Schermuly, C. C. (2011). Social category salience moderates the effect of diversity faultlines on information elaboration. Small Group Research, 42, 257–282. doi: 10.1177/1046496411398396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402–433.Google Scholar
  26. Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pelled, L. H. (1996). Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 230–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips, K. W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity, and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shemla, M. (2011). Group composition as a cross-level moderator. The Group Psychologist, 21, 28–29.Google Scholar
  32. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1709–1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Somech, A., & Wenderow, M. (2006). The impact of participative and directive leadership on teachers’ performance: The intervening effects of job structuring, decision domain, and leader-member exchange. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(5), 746–772. doi: 10.1177/0013161x06290648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van Dick, R., van Knippenberg, D., Hagele, S., Guillaume, Y. R. F., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2008). Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations, 61(10), 1463–1492. doi: 10.1177/0018726708095711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Dijk, H., Van Engen, M. L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 38–53.Google Scholar
  39. van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Knippenberg, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2003). Realizing the diversity dividend: Exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology, and reality. In S. A. Haslam, D. V. Knippenberg, M. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 61–77). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141–162.Google Scholar
  43. Wegge, J. (2003). Heterogenität und Homogenität in Gruppen als Chance und Risiko für die Gruppeneffektivität [Heterogeneity and homogeneity in groups as chance and risk for group efficiency]. In S. S. A. Thomas (Ed.), Teamarbeit und Teamentwicklung (pp. 119–141). Toronto, ON: Gogrefe.Google Scholar
  44. Wegge, J., Roth, C., Neubach, B., Schmidt, K. H., & Kanfer, R. (2008). Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1301–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wegge, J., & Schmidt, K. H. (2009). The impact of age diversity in teams on group performance and health. In C. C. A. Antoniou, G. Cooper, M. Eyseneck, & C. Spielberger (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology and medicine (pp. 79–94). Erlbaun: Mahwah.Google Scholar
  46. Wegge, J., & Shemla, M. (2011). Diversity-management. In W. Sarges (Ed.), Management-Diagnostik. Göttingen: Hogrefe-Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Williams, K., & O’Reilly, C., III. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of forty years of research. In R. I. Sutton & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Work and Organizational PsychologyTechnical University of DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Work and Organizational PsychologyTechnical University of DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations