Abstract
Indigenous students in the middle-school years experiencing difficulties in basic mathematics are a particularly vulnerable group. During these years gaps in performance between educationally disadvantaged students and their peers widen, potentially leading to ongoing economic and social disadvantage. This chapter reports on a teaching intervention referred to as QuickSmart, which has been particularly successful with Indigenous students who perform in the bottom 30 % of the achievement spectrum in Australia-wide tests. QuickSmart has been used in Australian schools since 2001. The pedagogical approach that underpins this numeracy program can be considered at three levels. The first is as an instructional program that withdraws pairs of students from their classroom instruction for three 30-min periods each week for a 30-week period. The second level constitutes pedagogical themes that are important within QuickSmart lessons. For example, the instruction offered in QuickSmart lessons builds on the pre-existing knowledge and understandings of students in order to encourage their self-belief through successful learning experiences and by focusing on what are considered foundational skills in mathematics. This approach is very suited to enhancing the learning of many Indigenous students. The third level of pedagogical emphasis relates to the benefits that flow from recruiting Indigenous teacher assistants as instructors and examining their involvement in the associated professional learning program. This chapter concludes with evidence drawn from the learning progress of Indigenous middle-school students who completed the QuickSmart numeracy program. These data show, based on effect-size statistics, cognitive growth for students of up to 2 years over the course of a 30-week program.
Keywords
- Indigenous Students
- Professional Learning Workshops
- National Assessment Program – Literacy And Numeracy (NAPLAN)
- Basic Academic Skills
- Australian Council For Educational Research (ACER)
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACER. (2005). Progressive achievement tests in mathematics (PAT Maths, 3rd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: ACER.
Ainley, J., Kos, J., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in science, mathematics and technology in Australian education. ACER Research Monographs. http://research.acer.edu.au/acer_monographs/4
Al-Yaman, F., & Higgins, D. (2011). What works to overcome Indigenous disadvantage: Key learnings and gaps in the evidence (Produced for the closing the gap clearinghouse). Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and the Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2009). The health and welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (ABS cat. No. 4704.0). Canberra, Australia.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 10, 51–73.
Bellert, A. (2009). Narrowing the gap: A report on the QuickSmart mathematics intervention. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(2), 171–183.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2010). Closing the gap prime minister’s report 2010. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.
Council of Australian Governments. (2008). National partnership agreement on closing the gap in Indigenous health outcomes. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.
Council of Australian Governments. (2009). Indigenous reform agreement (Closing the gap). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.
Deshler, D., Mellard, D. F., Tollefson, J. M., & Byrd, S. E. (2005). Research topics in responsiveness to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 483–484.
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004). Literacy and health outcomes: systematic review of the literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 1228–1239.
Dobson, P. J. (2001). Longitudinal case research: A critical perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14(3), 283–296.
Efthymiades, D., Roberts, J., & Morony, W. (2000). Numeracy development of Indigenous students: An introduction to research. Paper presented at the ACER research conference (pp. 27–30), Brisbane, Australia.
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.
Frigo, T., Corrigan, M., Adams, I., Hughes, P., Stephens, M., & Woods, D. (2004). Supporting English literacy and numeracy learning for Indigenous students in the early years. (ACER Research Monograph No. 57). Melbourne, Australia: ACER.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2001). Principles for the prevention and intervention of mathematical difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 85–95.
Graham, L., Bellert, A. M., & Pegg, J. E. (2001, October). Enhancing the automaticity of basic academic skills for middle school students. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Australian Association of Special Education, Melbourne, Australia.
Graham, L., Bellert, A., Thomas, J., & Pegg, J. (2007). A basic skills intervention for middle school students with learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 410–419.
Graham, L., Bellert, A., & Thomas, J. (2005). QuickSmart: Improving literacy for students with learning difficulties. In Multiliteracies and English teaching K-12 in the age of information and communication technologies (Vol. 1, pp. 1–27).
Graham, L., Pegg, J., & Alder, L. (2007). Enhancing secondary school students’ literacy performance through a basic skills intervention. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30(3), 221–234.
Harrison, N. (2011). Teaching and learning in Aboriginal education (2nd ed.). South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford.
Higher Education Research Data Collection (HERDC). (2011). Specifications for the collection of 2010 data. Research Funding and Policy Branch, Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.
Howard, P., Cooke, S., Lowe, K., & Perry, B. (2011). Enhancing quality and equity in mathematics education for Australian indigenous students. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematic education (pp. 365–378). New York: Springer Science and Business.
Malin, M. A. (2003). Is schooling good for Aboriginal children’s health? Casuarina, NT: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health.
Marston, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 539–544.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2001). Report of the MCEETYA taskforce on Indigenous education. Canberra, Australia: MCEETYA.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2008). National assessment program literacy and numeracy: Summary report. Canberra, Australia: MCEETYA.
McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 445–463.
National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN). (2008). National assessment program literacy and numeracy: Summary report. Canberra, Australia: MCEETYA.
Pegg, J., & Graham, L. (2007). Addressing the needs of low-achieving mathematics students: Helping students ‘Trust Their Heads’. Keynote. In K. Milton, H. Reeves, & T. Spencer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
Pegg, J. E., Graham, L. J., & Bellert, A. (2005). The effect of improved automaticity of basic number skills on persistently low-achieving pupils. Learners and learning environments, 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 4–49).
Pegg, J., & Panizzon, D. (2007). Inequities in student achievement for literacy: Metropolitan versus rural comparisons. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30(3), 177–190.
Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39, 183–197.
Rowe, K., Stephanou, A., & Urbach, D. (2006). Effective teaching and learning practices initiative for students with learning difficulties. Report to the Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Printery.
Sharplin, E. (2006). Rural retreat or outback hell: Expectations of rural and remote teaching. Issues in Educational Research, 12(1), 49–61.
Spillane, J. P., Parise, L. M., & Sherer, J. Z. (2011). Organizational routines as coupling mechanisms: Policy, school administration, and the technical core. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 586–620.
Strain, P. S., & Hoyson, M. (2000). The need for longitudinal intervention: Follow-up outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(2), 116–122.
Thomas, A. R., & Murphy, L. (2008). Report on the QuickSmart numeracy program for Indigenous students in the New England region. University of New England. Armidale: SiMERR.
Watson, P., Partington, G., Gray, J., & Mack, L. (2006). Culture, communities and students. Perth, WA: Aboriginal Education and Training Council.
Westwood, P. (2007). What teachers need to know about numeracy. Melbourne, Australia: ACER.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pegg, J., Graham, L. (2013). A Three-Level Intervention Pedagogy to Enhance the Academic Achievement of Indigenous Students: Evidence from QuickSmart . In: Jorgensen, R., Sullivan, P., Grootenboer, P. (eds) Pedagogies to Enhance Learning for Indigenous Students. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-84-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-84-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4021-83-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-4021-84-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)