Problem-based Learning and Student Motivation: The Role of Interest in Learning and Achievement

Chapter

Abstract

One of the underlying assumptions of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is that it motivates students to study. For instance, feeling of being in charge of one’s own learning, working in small groups under the limited guidance of a teacher, working on real-life problems and puzzles are all factors that are expected to make learning more interesting. To date, there are, however, only a very little number of studies that investigate whether PBL has indeed a motivating effect on student learning. In this chapter, the results of two recently conducted studies are summarized that measured student motivation by means of students’ levels of situational interest in the PBL classroom. The first study examined how interest developed during a PBL lesson of one day. For instance, it was measured whether presenting a problem increases student interest, and what happens to their levels of interest during self-study and reporting of findings at the end of the day. The second study explored in how far facilitators impact student interest in PBL. To that end, three facilitator characteristics were measured: (1) subject-matter expertise (i.e. the knowledge a facilitator has); (2) social congruence (i.e. how well a facilitator is able to “tune in” to the students); and (3) cognitive congruence (i.e. a facilitator’s ability to encourage and enable student learning). It was then investigated which of these factors has the largest impact on student interest. The results of both studies provide more insights in the intricate mechanisms responsible to motivate students to study in PBL. The finding and implications of these studies for PBL research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Situational interest student motivation Confirmatory factor analysis Path analysis  Problem-based learning facilitator characteristics social congruence cognitive congruence tutor expertise 

References

  1. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 180–191.Google Scholar
  4. Berlyne, D. E. (1978). Curiosity and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 2(2), 97–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. De Grave, W. S., Dolmans, D., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1999). Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: Scaffolding student learning. Medical Education, 33(12), 901–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 325–346.Google Scholar
  10. Grave, W. S. D., Dolmans, D., & Vleuten, C. P. M. (1998). Tutor intervention profile: Reliability and validity. Medical Education, 32(3), 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571.Google Scholar
  12. Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krapp, A., & Lewalter, D. (Eds.). (2001). Development of interests and interest-based motivational orientations: A longitudinal study in vocational school and work settings (Motivation in learning contexts. Theoretical advances and methodological implications). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  15. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Litman, J. A. (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1585–1595. doi:10.1016/J.Paid.2008.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Litman, J. A., & Jimerson, T. L. (2004). The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Litman, J. A., Hutchins, T., & Russon, R. (2005). Epistemic curiosity, feeling-of-knowing, and exploratory behaviour. Cognition & Emotion, 19(4), 559–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lockspeiser, T. M., O’Sullivan, P., Teherani, A., & Muller, J. (2008). Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: The value of social and cognitive congruence. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Long, J. F. (2003). Connecting with the content: How teacher interest affects student interest in a core course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  22. Long, J. F., & Murphy, P. K. (2005). Connecting through content: The responsiveness of teacher and student interest in a core course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, Montreal.Google Scholar
  23. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moust, J. H. C. (1993). The role of tutors in problem-based learning. Contrasts between student- and staff-tutors. Maastricht: University of Limburg.Google Scholar
  25. Norman, G. T., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prenzel, M. (1992). The selective persistence of interest. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 71–98). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173–195). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183–212). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17(1), 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural equations modelling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70(1), 708–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (2000). Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective in learning interactions (pp. 19–52). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Schmidt, H. G., Van der Arend, A., Moust, J. H. C., Kokx, I., & Boon, L. (1993). Influence of tutors’ subject-matter expertise on student effort and achievement in problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 68(10), 784–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmidt, H. G., Dolmans, D., Gijselaers, W. H., & Des Marchais, J. E. (1995). Theory-guided design of a rating scale for course evaluation in problem-based curricula. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 7(1), 82–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shirey, L. L. (1992). Importance, interest, and selective attention. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 281–296). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  37. Sloboda, J. A., & Davidson, J. W. (1995). The young performing musican. In I. Deliege & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), The origins and development of musical competence (pp. 171–190). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Solomon, P., & Crowe, J. (2001). Perceptions of student peer tutors in a problem-based learning programme. Medical Teacher, 23(2), 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spielberger, C. D., & Starr, L. M. (1994). Curiosity and exploratory behavior. In H. F. O’Neil Jr. & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation, theory and research (pp. 221–243). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations