Skip to main content

Pedagogical Philosophy Underpinning One-Day, One-Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1710 Accesses

Abstract

Within the overarching educational objective in Singapore of developing youth for life as confident individuals who are self-directed learners, active contributors and concerned citizens, the specialised purpose of polytechnics is training para-professional manpower for the local economy. Recognising that the broad transformation envisaged here necessarily entails a physical modification of each individual, when designing the pedagogical scheme for Republic Polytechnic, education was conceptualised as a synergistic phenomenon of co-evolutionary enculturation in a human collective in order to make better sense of reality. This was envisioned to be achievable through active engagement of learners in peer groups under the guidance of development-oriented caring individuals who have a reasonable understanding of the realities of the world in general and at least one relevant specialised economic sector in particular. The main classroom strategy is nurturing by deliberate intervention for promoting co-evolution of groups in desirable directions. The overall purpose is to enable the graduates to become adaptable to changing circumstances and remain as active participants of economic and other spheres of life, as procedural knowledge becomes obsolete over time at an ever increasing pace. Rejected are the notions that each individual has a predetermined fixed potential, mind and body are separate, and knowledge is a collection external to humans. A learning work-cycle of 1 day duration was chosen in view of the diversity of knowledge facets expected to be addressed in a diploma programme, that many human work routines follow a day-based cycle, and that it allows for focussing on a single academic activity on a given day. A problem-based learning approach was adopted for structuring the daily routine. For student assessment, significant weighting was allocated to the engagement components of the pedagogy, along with testing for subject understanding, in view of the substantial role played by interaction among individuals in their educational transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bobbitt, F. (1918). The curriculum: A summary of the development concerning the theory of the curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (2004). Inventions of teaching: A genealogy. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2000). Engaging minds: Learning and teaching in a complex world. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1966). In R. D. Archambault (ed.), Lectures in the philosophy of education 1899., R. D. (Ed.). New York: Random House Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, K., & Gajdamaschko, N. (2001). Some cognitive tools of literacy . Retrieved April 23, 2011, from http://www.educ.sfu.ca/kegan/Vygotskycogandlit.pdf

  • Entwistle, N. (1998). Styles of learning and teaching. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (1970). A brief introduction to personal construct theory. In D. Bannister (Ed.), Perspectives in personal construct theory (pp. 1–29). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (5th ed.). Woburn: Butterwirth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1979). The process of student learning. Higher Education, 8, 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I – Outcome and process. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2009). Desired outcomes of education, Singapore. Retrieved August 29, 2011, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/desired-outcomes/

  • Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1997). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schugurensky, D. (2000). The forms of informal learning: Towards a conceptualization of the field. Retrieved April 30, 2011, from http://hdl.handle.net/1807/2733.

  • Shaull, R., in Foreword of: Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. V. (1962). Thought and language (trans: Hamfnann, E., & Vakar, G.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. A. M. Alwis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alwis, W.A.M. (2012). Pedagogical Philosophy Underpinning One-Day, One-Problem. In: O'Grady, G., Yew, E., Goh, K., Schmidt, H. (eds) One-Day, One-Problem. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-75-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics