Advertisement

WITS 2020 pp 37-47 | Cite as

LiteNet: A Novel Approach for Traffic Sign Classification Using a Light Architecture

Conference paper
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 745)

Abstract

This paper presents a deep convolutional neural network architecture to classify the traffic signs of the GTSRB dataset. Our method uses a very light architecture with a few number of parameters that achieve good results without the need of hard computation. To get at our goal, we use a filter bank. The aim of which being to extract more features, which will be used as input to a fully connected classifier. The recognition rate of our model gets an accuracy of 99.15%, overpassing the human performance being 98.81%. This way, LiteNet competes the best state of art architectures since our approach uses less memory and less computation.

Keywords

Deep learning Traffic sign Network convolutional neural network Classification 

References

  1. 1.
    Stallkamp J, Schlipsing M, Salmen J, Igel C (2011) The German traffic sign recognition benchmark: a multi-class classification competition. In: International joint conference on neural networksGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidhuber J (2014) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. arXiv:1404.7828v4 [cs.NE] 8 Oct 2014
  3. 3.
    Mathias M, Timofte R, Benenson R, Van Gool L (2013) Traffic sign recognitionhow far are we from the solution? In: The 2013 international joint conference on Neural networks (IJCNN). IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shakhuro VI, Konouchine A (2016) Russian traffic sign images dataset. Comput Opt 40(2):294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu Z, Liang D, Zhang S, Huang X, Li B, Hu S. (2016) Traffic-sign detection and classification in the wild. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2110–2118Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zaklouta F, Stanciulescu B, Hamdoun O (2011) Traffic sign classification using K-d trees and random forests. In: Proceedings of international joint conference on neural networks, San Jose, California, 31 July– 5 Aug 5 2011Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalal N, Triggs B (2005) Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’05), vol 1, pp 886–893Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alefs B, Eschemann G, Ramoser H, Beleznai C (2007) Road sign detection from edge orientation histograms. In: 2007 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, pp 993–998Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dalal N, Triggs B (2005) Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: Schmid C, Soatto S, Tomasi C, (eds) International conference on computer vision & pattern recognition, vol 2, INRIA Rhône-Alpes, ZIRST-655, av. de l’Europe, Montbonnot-38334, June 2005, pp 886–893. (Online). Available: http://lear.inrialpes.fr/pubs/2005/DT05Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De La Escalera A, Moreno L, Salichs M, Armingol J (1997) Road traffic sign detection and classification. IEEE Trans Indus Electron 44(6):848–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loy G, Barnes N (2004) Fast shape-based road sign detection for a driver assistance system. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, vol 1, pp 70–75Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cireşan D, Meier U, Masci J, Schmidhuber J (2012) Multi-column deep neural network for traffic sign classification. Neural Netw 32:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sermanet P, LeCun Y (2011) Traffic sign recognition with multi-scale convolutional networks. In: The 2011 international joint conference on neural networks, pp 2809–2813Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arcos-García * A, Álvarez-García JA, Deep LM (2018) Neural network for traffic sign recognition systems: an analysis of spatial transformers and stochastic optimisation methods. Soria-Morillo, 2018 Elsevier Neural NetworksGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V, Alemi AA (2017) Inception-v4, inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on Learningtion. In: AAAI’17: Proceedings of the thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 4278–4284 ssGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szege C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, Shlens J, Wojna Z (2015) Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. arXiv: 1512.00567v3 [cs.CV] 11 Dec 2015
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Stallkamp J, Schlipsing M, Salmen J, Igel C (2012) Benchmarking machine learning algorithms for traffic sign recognition. Man vs. computer. Neural Netw 32:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang C, Jin J, Fu K (2014) Traffic sign recognition with hinge loss trained convolutional neural networks. In: IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, pp 1991–2000Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wong A, Shafiee MJ, St. Jules M (2018) MicronNet: a highly compact deep convolutional neural network architecture for real-time embedded traffic sign classification.arXiv:1804.00497v3 [cs.CV] 3 Oct 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematique and Applications Laboratory, Sciences and Techniques Faculty of MohammediaHassan 2 UniversityCasablancaMorocco

Personalised recommendations