Abstract
Firmly entrenched in Cambodia’s political regime are patron–client networks, which have formed among the winning coalitions to maintain the power of Hun Sen for more than three decades. To hold onto power, the patrons, having Hun Sen as chair or central patron, have employed a number of strategies that rely on the design of extractive political and economic institutions. These strategies have coalesced into two main approaches: (i) the protection of the members of the winning coalitions in order to form patron–client networks and enable rent extraction from public goods and natural resources, and (ii) the co-option and circumvention of the challengers. These two strategies are manipulated as necessary to respond to the threat from outsiders or challengers. The central patron of the regime protects the members of the winning coalitions to extract rent from public goods and natural resources, and rents are later distributed to mobilise political support from constituents. In addition, the regime has secured office tenure because of its ability to co-opt and circumvent challengers, including opposition parties and civil society organisations (CSOs). In so doing, the direct or indirect movements of challengers, such as disgruntled grassroots communities and NGOs, appear to achieve mixed outcomes; some of them succeed in achieving their demands or stated objectives, and others fail to do so
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options

(Source Author, 2020)

(Source Author, 2019)
Notes
- 1.
http://www.cambodiainvestment.gov.kh/why-invest-in-cambodia/investment-enviroment/investment-trend.html (accessed on 23 Sept, 2018).
- 2.
United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia.
- 3.
Front Uni Nationale pour un Cambodge Independent, Neutrale, Pacifique et Cooperatif.
- 4.
This book prefers the term ‘partial legitimacy’ because the central patron of the regime is believed to has held power without free and fair elections, in addition to establishing repressive and coercive non-winning coalitions. Despite its different types, legitimacy here is referred to as gaining the support of electorates, regardless of electoral irregularities, manipulation, vote-buying, coercion, and non-free and unfair contestation.
- 5.
Interview with a standing member of parliament/ruling party, 18 December 2013.
- 6.
This was a speech recorded by Global Witness “The Green Deal in Cambodia”, which can be accessed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1ILhuX2-68 (watched on 6 April 2015).
- 7.
At the request of the government, Oknha is a title granted by His Majesty the King of Cambodia to a person who donates US$100,000 (increased to $500,000 in 2017) either in cash or in the form of pagodas, roads or other infrastructure to the government. As of 2014, more than 700 Oknhas had been granted. However, a number of researchers and critiques have alleged that the title has been used for commercial purposes or to threaten ordinary people or lower government officials or authorities to facilitate business.
- 8.
Interview with deputy provincial governor, 15 December 2013, who confirmed that foreign investors allocate certain shares to their Cambodian brokers and they later become local partners.
- 9.
Interview with ELC company CEO, 18 December 2013, and interview with ELC company general manager, 27 November 2013, who shared the same perspective on protection of the business.
- 10.
Informal interview with an official of Minister of Interior (MoI), 15 June 2020.
References
ADHOC (Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association). (2013). A turning point? Land, housing and natural resource rights in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: ADHOC.
ADHOC. (2014). Land Situation in Cambodia 2013. Phnom Penh: ADHOC.
ANFREL (Asian Network for Free Elections). (2013). Transparency and impartial investigation needed to repair lost confidence in Cambodian elections [Press release]. Retrieved on 30 July 2015 from http://anfrel.org/transparency-impartial-investigation-needed-to-repair-lost-confidence-in-cambodian-elections/.
Baaz, M., & Lilja, M. (2014). Understanding hybrid democracy in Cambodia: The nexus between liberal democracy, the state, civil society, and a “politics of presence”. Asian Politics & Policy, 6(1), 5–24.
Barney, K. (2005). Customs, concessionaires and conflict: Tracking Cambodia’s forest commodity chains and export links with China. China and forest trade in the Asia-Pacific region: Implications for forests and livelihoods. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
Beresford, M., Nguon, S., Rathin, R., Sau, S., & Ceema, N. (2003). The macroeconomics of poverty reduction in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: United Nations Development Programme.
Blue, R., Blair, H., & Mitchell, L. (2008). Political competitiveness and civil Society assessment. Phnom Penh: USAID.
Burgos, S., & Ear, S. (2010). China’s strategic interests in Cambodia: Influence and resources. Asian Survey, 50(3), 615–639.
CCC (Cambodian Committee for Cooperation). (2012). CSO contributions to the development of Cambodia 2011. Phnom Penh: Cooperation Committee for Cambodia.
CDC (Councils for the Development of Cambodia). (2010). Cambodian investment board: Projects by sector approved. Phnom Penh: Councils for Development of Cambodia.
CDC. (2020). Development cooperation and partnership report. Phnom Penh: Councils for Development of Cambodia.
Chan, S., & Acharya, S. (2002). Land transactions in Cambodia: An analysis of transfers and transaction records. Phnom Penh: Cambodia Development Resource Institute.
Chandler, D. P. (2008). A history of Cambodia (4th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Cock, A. R. (2010). Anticipating an oil boom: The “resource curse” thesis in the play of Cambodian politics. Pacific Affairs, 83(3), 525–546.
Cock, A. R. (2011). The rise of provincial business in Cambodia. In C. Hughes & K. Un (Eds.), Cambodia’s economic transformation (pp. 27–49). Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.
COMFREL (The Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia). (2013). 2013 national assembly elections: Final assessment and report. Phnom Penh: COMFREL.
Craig, D., & Pak, K. (2011). Party financing of local investment protects: Elites and mass patronage. In C. Hughes & K. Un (Eds.), Cambodia’s economic transformation (pp. 200–219). Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.
Devies, J. (2016, May 30). Timber exports to Vietnam way up. The Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved on June 05, 2016 from http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/timber-exports-vietnam-way.
Ear, S. (2013). Aid dependence in Cambodia: How foreign assistance undermines democracy. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Ebihara, M. (1987). Revolution and reformulation in Kampuchean village culture. In D. Ablin & M. Hood (Eds.), The Cambodian Agony (pp. 16–61). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Eng, N. (2014). The politics of decentralization in Cambodia: The district level (Doctor of Philosophy). Melbourne: Monash University.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation). (1997). State of the world’s forests. Rome: FAO.
Global Witness. (2007). Cambodia’s family trees. Washington, DC: Global Witness.
Global Witness. (2009). Country for sale, welcome to Cambodia: How Cambodia’s elite has captured the Country’s extractive industries. Washington D.C.: Global Witness.
Gottesman, E. (2004). Cambodia after the Khmer Rouge: Inside the politics of national building. London: Yale University Press.
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(04), 725–740.
HRW (Human Right Watch). (2015). 30 Years of Hun Sen: Violence, Repression, and Corruption in Cambodia. Washington, DC: HRW.
Hughes, C. (2001). Mystics and militants: Democratic reform in Cambodia. International Politics, 38(1), 47–64.
Hughes, C. (2003). Political economy of the Cambodian transition. London: Routledge.
Hughes, C. (2006). The politics of gifts: Tradition and regimentation in contemporary Cambodia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 37(3), 469–489.
Hughes, C., & Conway, T. (2004). Understanding pro-poor political change: The policy process–Cambodia. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Hughes, C., & Hutchison, J. (2012). Development effectiveness and the politics of commitment. Third World Quarterly, 33(1), 17–36.
Hughes, C., & Un, K. (2011). Cambodia’s economic transformation: Historical and theoretical frameworks. In C. Hughes & U. Kheang (Eds.), Cambodia’s economic transformation (pp. 1–26). Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.
Jacobsen, T., & Stuart-Fox, M. (2013). Power and political culture in Cambodia (Working Paper 200). Singapore: Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.
Kato, T., Kaplan, J., Chan, S., & Sopheap, R. (2000). Cambodia: Enhancing governance for sustainable development. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Le Billon, P. (2002). Logging in muddy waters: the politics of forest exploitation in Cambodia. Critical Asian Studies, 34(4), 563–586.
Ledgerwood, J. (1998). Rural development in Cambodia: The view from the village. In F. Z. Brown & D, G. Timberman (eds.), Cambodia and the international community: The quest for peace, development and democracy, (pp. 127–147). New York: Asia Society.
Milne, S. (2015). Cambodia’s unofficial regime of extraction: Illicit logging in the shadow of transnational governance and investment. Central Asian Studies, 47(2), 200–228.
Milne, S., Pak, K., & Sullivan, M. (2015). Shackled to nature? The post-conflict state and its symbiotic relationship with natural resources. In S. Milne & S. Mahanty (Eds.), Conservation and development in Cambodia: Exploring frontiers of change in nature, state and society (pp. 28–50). New York: Routledge.
Mong Hay, L. (2007). Cambodia’s extremist political culture. Retrieved on May 25, 2014 from http://alrc.asia/article2/2007/08/cambodias-extremist-political-culture/.
Neou, V. (2013, March 7). Hun Sen says CPP largess will end if election is lost. The Cambodia Daily. Retrieved on December 21, 2016 from https://www.cambodiadaily.com/elections/hun-sen-says-cpp-largess-will-end-if-election-is-lost-12645/.
Ngin, C., & Verkoren, W. (2015). Understanding power in hybrid political orders: Applying stakeholder analysis to land conflicts in Cambodia. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 10(1), 25–39.
Norén-Nilsson, A. (2016). Good gifts, bad gifts, and rights: Cambodian popular perceptions and the 2013 Elections. Pacific Affairs, 89(4), 795–815.
ODC (Opend Development Cambodia). (2013). Forest cover. Retrieved January 10, 2015 from http://www.opendevelopmentcambodia.net/briefings/forest-cover/.
Oldenburg, C., & Neef, A. (2014). Reversing land grabs or aggravating tenure insecurity? Competing perspectives on economic land concessions and land titling in Cambodia. Law and Development Review, 7(1), 49–77.
Oxfam, G. B. (2007). Report on land holding in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: Oxfam GB Cambodia.
Pak, K. (2011). A dominant party in a weak state: How the ruling party in Cambodia has managed to stay dominant (Doctor of Philosophy). Canberra: Australian National University.
Pak, K., Horng, V., Eng, N., Ann, S., Kim, S., Knowles, J., & Craig, D. (2007). Accountability and Neo-patrimonialism: A Critical literature review (Working Paper 34). Phnom Penh: Cambodia Development Resource Institute.
Peou, S. (1998). Hun Sen’s pre-emptive coup: Causes and consequences. Southeast Asian Affairs, 86–102.
Peou, S. (2001). Cambodia after the killing fields. In J. Funston (Ed.), Government and politics in Southeast Asia (pp. 36–73). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Polyani, K. (1944). The great transformation. New York: Rinehart.
Ponniah, K., & Channyda, C. (2014). Government announces wage raise for civil servants. Retrieved on August 15, 2014 from http://www.phnompenhpost.com/post-weekend/gov’t-announces-wage-raise-civil-servants.
Reuters. (2017, November 21). China supports Cambodia’s crackdown on political opposition. Retrieved on 25 November 2017 from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cambodia-politics-china/china-supports-cambodias-crackdown-on-political-opposition-idUSKBN1DL01L.
RFA (Radio Free Asia). (2013). China endorses ruling party ‘victory’ in Cambodia election. Retrieved on August 11, 2015 from http://www.rfa.org/english/news/cambodia/china-08212013163833.html.
RFA. (2014). Cambodia to reduce tax burden for civil servants. Retrieved on October 19, 2014 from http://www.rfa.org/english/news/cambodia/civil-servants-10092014174922.html.
RFA. (2015). Cambodia’s armed forces ‘belong’ to the ruling party: Four-star general. Retrieved on August 13, 2015 from http://www.rfa.org/english/news/cambodia/military-07292015145855.html.
RGC (Royal Government of Cambodia). (2005). Sub-decree on economic land concessions. Phnom Penh: RGC.
RGC. (2011). Aid effectiveness report 2011. Phnom Penh: RGC.
RGC. (2012). The Cambodian government’s achievements and future direction in sustainable development: National report for Rio + 20, United Nations conference on sustainable development. Phnom Penh: Ministry of Environment.
Sithirith, M. (2014). The Patron-client system and Its effect on resources management in Cambodia: A Case in the Tonle Sap Lake. Asian Politics & Policy, 6(4), 595–609.
So, S. (2009). Political economy of land registration in Cambodia (Doctor of Philosophy). Illinois: Northern Illinois University.
Sochua, M. (2015, August 3). RCAF role is to protect the Cambodian people. The Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved on August 13, 2015 from http://www.phnompenhpost.com/analysis-and-op-ed/rcaf-role-protect-cambodian-people.
Sokha, C. (200b, August 28). CPP breaks campaign pledge to build school in Kampong Thom. The Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved on December 21, 2016 from http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/cpp-breaks-campaign-pledge-build-school-kampong-thom.
Song, S.-Y., Lee, Y., Stone, A., Zoido-Lobaton, P., Pilichowski, E., & Nunberg, B. (2000). Cambodia governance and corruption diagnostic: Evidence from citizen, enterprise and public official surveys. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
Sotheary, P. (2015, August 14). King signs law on NGOs. The Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved on February 26, 2016 at http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/king-signs-law-ngos.
Transparency International. (2020). Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved on September 02, 2020 from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2019/results/khm#details.
Un, K. (2005). Democratization in East Asia: Patronage politics and hybrid democracy: Political change in Cambodia, 1993–2003. Asian Perspective, 29(2), 203–231.
Un, K. (2006). State, society and democratic consolidation: The case of Cambodia. Pacific Affairs, 79(2), 225–245.
Un, K. (2009). China’s foreign investment and assistance: Implications for Cambodia’s development and democratization. Peace & Conflict Studies, 16(2), 65–81.
Un, K., & So, S. (2009). Politics of natural resource use in Cambodia. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 36(3), 123–138.
Un, K., & So, S. (2011). Land rights in Cambodia: How neopatrimonial politics restricts land policy reform. Pacific Affairs, 84(2), 289–308.
Verver, M., & Dahles, H. (2015). The Institutionalisation of Oknha: Cambodian Entrepreneurship at the interface of business and politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45(1), 48–70.
World Bank. (2007). The World Bank lifts suspension of projects [Press release]. Retrieved from on June 07, 2015 http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/EASTASIAPACIFICEXT/CAMBODIAEXTN/0,,contentMDK:21210790~menuPK:293861~pagePK:2865066~piPK:2865079~theSitePK:293856,00.html.
World Bank. (2014). Online Data: Cambodia. http://data.worldbank.org/country/cambodia.
Worrell, S. (2013, December 12). Can’t see the forest…. The Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved on September 23, 2014 from http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/can’t-see-forest-….
Young, S. (2015). Contention and corporate sustainability practices in the Cambodian agricultural sector. Hong Kong SAR: Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.
Young, S. (2016a). Challenges and practices towards sustainability. In K. Brickell & S. Springer (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary Cambodia (pp. 111–122). London: Routledge.
Young, S. (2016b). Movement of indigenous communities targeting an agro-industrial investment in Northeastern Cambodia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 44(1–2), 188–214.
Young, S. (2016c). Popular resistance in Cambodia: Rationale behind the government response. Asian Politics & Policy, 8(4), 593–613.
Young, S. (2019). Protests, regulations, and environmental accountability in Cambodia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 38(1), 33–54.
Young, S. (2020). China’s belt and road initiative: Patron-client and capture in Cambodia. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 8(2), 414–434.
Young, S. (2021). Citizens of photography: visual activism, social media and rhetoric of collective action in Cambodia. South East Asia Research, 29(1), 53–71.
Young, S., Pongquan, S., & Ear, S. (2011). Local good governance of rural infrastructure development planning: Case studies of commune councils in Cambodia. International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development, 2(1), 59–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Young, S. (2021). The Dynamics of Political Durability of Cambodia’s Ruling Regime. In: Strategies of Authoritarian Survival and Dissensus in Southeast Asia. Palgrave Series in Asia and Pacific Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6112-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6112-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6111-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6112-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)