Skip to main content

Evaluating Online Tourism Education Quality by Using an Instructional Strategy Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology in Education. Innovations for Online Teaching and Learning (ICTE 2020)

Abstract

Online education becomes increasingly popular in tourism education. This research is based on a modified instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. The framework integrates behavioral learning theory, cognitive learning theory and social learning theory and proposed seven principles to evaluate the quality of online education. Although the framework is widely applied in an online learning environment, limited research has applied this framework in tourism education. There are three main objectives in the study: (1) to evaluate the learning experience from the student’s perspective; (2) to investigate the instructional strategies from the perspective of teachers; and (3) to compare whether there is any teacher-student discrepancy in the online education experience. This study adopted a mixed-method approach of data collection, which includes semi-structured in-depth interviews with teachers and a survey on the students’ opinion through a questionnaire. The results indicate that feedback is heavily influencing the online course quality from the perspective of students. Meanwhile, teachers tend to consider interaction as a critical factor due to the special requirement of the tourism industry. The findings shed lights on guiding the improvements in online tourism education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AlHamad, A.Q., Al Qawasmi, K.I., AlHamad, A.Q.: Key Factors in determining students’ satisfaction in online learning based on’Web Programming’course within Zarqa University. Int. J. Glob. Bus. 7(1), 7 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A., Ahmad, I.: Key factors for determining student satisfaction in distance learning courses: a study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 2(2), 118–134 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arthurs, L.A., Kreager, B.Z.: An integrative review of in-class activities that enable active learning in college science classroom settings. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 39(15), 2073–2091 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atay, L., Yildirim, H.M.: Determining factors that affect satisfaction of students in undergraduate tourism education (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Azeiteiro, U.M., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Caetano, F.J., Caeiro, S.: Education for sustainable development through e-learning in higher education: experiences from Portugal. J. Clean. Prod. 106, 308–319 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., Namazizadeh, M.: Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 82(2), 360–364 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benckendorff, P., Lohmann, G., Pratt, M., Reynolds, P., Strickland, P., Whitelaw, P.: Enhancing student learning outcomes with simulation-based pedagogies. Australas. Soc. Comput. Learn. Tert. Educ. (ASCILITE), 618–620 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelens, R., De Wever, B., Voet, M.: Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: a systematic literature review. Educ. Res. Rev. 22, 1–18 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger, D.U.: Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. Int. J. E-Learn. 3(1), 61–67 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, E., Aoki, K., Dlugosh, L.: Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 9(3) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, N.: Investigating the role of Minecraft in educational learning environments. Educ. Media Int. 53(4), 244–260 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carslaw, D.C., Taylor, P.J.: Analysis of air pollution data at a mixed source location using boosted regression trees. Atmos. Environ. 43(22), 3563–3570 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, H.-M., Chen, Y.-L., Huang, W.-H.: Examining the usability of an online virtual tour-guiding platform for cultural tourism education. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport. Tour. Educ. 23, 29–38 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cini, F., Van der Merwe, P., Saayman, M.: Tourism students’ knowledge and tenets towards ecotourism. J. Teach. Travel. Tour. 15(1), 74–91 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthrell, K., Lyon, A.: Instructional strategies: what do online students prefer. MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 3(4), 357–362 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, A.D., Costa, R.A., Pita, M., Costa, C.: Tourism education: what about entrepreneurial skills? J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 30, 65–72 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., Singh, S.: Digital badges in afterschool learning: Documenting the perspectives and experiences of students and educators. Comput. Educ. 88, 72–83 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennen, V.P., Aubteen Darabi, A., Smith, L.J.: Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Educ. 28(1), 65–79 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., Mitchell, R.: Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18(1), 7–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith, J., Leathwick, J.R., Hastie, T.: A working guide to boosted regression trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 77(4), 802–813 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T.: Exploratory Factor Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H., Wang, L., Yang, Y.: Human mobility restrictions and the spread of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China (0898-2937) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatima, J.K., Khan, H.Z., Goh, E.: Environmental knowledge and behavioural outcomes of tourism students in Australia: towards testing a range of mediation and moderated mediation effects. Environ. Educ. Res. 22(5), 747–764 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotiadis, A.K., Sigala, M.: Developing a framework for designing an Events Management Training Simulation (EMTS). J. Hosp. Leis. Sport. Tour. Educ. 16, 59–71 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangadharbatla, H.: Facebook me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites. J. Interact. Advert. 8(2), 5–15 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaytan, J., McEwen, B.C.: Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. Am. J. Distance Educ. 21(3), 117–132 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzlaf, B., Perry, B., Toffner, G., Lamarche, K., Edwards, M.: Effective instructor feedback: perceptions of online graduate students. J. Educ. Online 6(2), n2 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, R., Jennings, G.: Transformation for sustainability: the role of complexity in tourism students’ understanding of sustainable tourism. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport. Tour. Educ. 21, 185–194 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, C., Velan, G.M., Pryor, W.M., Kumar, R.K.: A model for the use of blended learning in large group teaching sessions. BMC Med. Educ. 17(1), 197 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H.: Instructional technologies facilitating online courses. Educ. Technol., 41–46 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Inui, Y., Wheeler, D., Lankford, S.: Rethinking tourism education: what should schools teach. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport. Tour. Educ. 5(2), 25–35 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R.: An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ. 2003(100), 31–43 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R., Shaik, N.: Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 11(1), 29–49 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, M.S.Y.: Context-aware geography field trip with EagleEye: teachers’ first experience. In: Chang, M., Li, Y. (eds.) Smart Learning Environments. LNET, pp. 77–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44447-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelner, S., Sanders, G.: Beyond the field trip: teaching tourism through tours. Teach. Sociol. 37(2), 136–150 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J.: Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 8(3), 239–260 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A.E., Schroder, K.E., Belland, B.R.: Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet High. Educ. 20, 35–50 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learning, A.: Health and life skills guide to implementation (K–9): instructional strategies. Accessed 6 June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.M.: Contributions of research on student thinking in physical education. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 16(3), 262–277 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydon, J., Turner, S.: The challenges and rewards of introducing field trips into a large introductory geography class. J. Geogr. 112(6), 248–261 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, K.-H., Hsieh, M.-F.: Statistic exploring the casual relationships between service quality, brand image, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty on the leisure resort industry. Paper presented at the Service Management (IRSSM-2) in 2011 proceedings of the 2nd International Research Symposium (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Strovas, J., Moseley, C., Arsuffi, T.: Environmental literacy of undergraduate college students: development of the environmental literacy instrument (ELI). Sch. Sci. Math. 118(3–4), 84–92 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J., Bryant, B., Brown, B., Kim, M.: Using second life to enhance classroom management practice in teacher education. Educ. Media Int. 47(2), 121–134 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maumbe, K.: Teaching and learning in recreation and tourism: a comparison of three instructional methods. J. Teach. Travel. Tour. 14(4), 365–385 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavridis, A., Katmada, A., Tsiatsos, T.: Impact of online flexible games on students’ attitude towards mathematics. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 65(6), 1451–1470 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9522-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, C., Vagias, W.M., DeWard, S.L.: Exploring additional determinants of environmentally responsible behavior: the influence of environmental literature and environmental attitudes. Environ. Behav. 42(4), 420–447 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghavvemi, S., Paramanathan, T., Rahin, N.M., Sharabati, M.: Student’s perceptions towards using e-learning via Facebook. Behav. Inf. Technol. 36(10), 1081–1100 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.: From production line to drama school: higher education for the future of tourism. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag.(2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C.M.: Social constructivism and tourism education. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport. Tour. Educ. (Pre-2012) 10(2), 103 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, R.A., Merisotis, J.P.: What’s the difference?: A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education: Institute for Higher Education Policy (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raptis, G.E., Fidas, C., Avouris, N.: Effects of mixed-reality on players’ behaviour and immersion in a cultural tourism game: a cognitive processing perspective. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 114, 69–79 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, M.: A shift from classroom to distance learning: advantages and limitations. Int. J. Res. Engl. Educ. 4(1), 80–88 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saulnier, B.M., Landry, J.P., Longenecker Jr., H.E., Wagner, T.A.: From teaching to learning: learner-centered teaching and assessment in information systems education. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 19(2), 169 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapire, R.E.: The boosting approach to machine learning: an overview. In: Denison, D.D., Hansen, M.H., Holmes, C.C., Mallick, B., Yu, B. (eds.) Nonlinear Estimation and Classification. LNS, vol. 171, pp. 149–171. Springer, New York (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21579-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schott, C.: Virtual fieldtrips and climate change education for tourism students. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport. Tour. Educ. 21, 13–22 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotland, M.: Higher education program curricula models in tourism and hospitality education: a review of the literature. Online Submission (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Semley, N., Huang, R., Dalton, J.: Feedback for learning development: tourism students’ perspective. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport. Tour. Educ. 19, 41–53 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigala, M.: The evolution of internet pedagogy: Benefits for tourism and hospitality education. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport. Tour. Educ. 1(2), 29–45 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigala, M.: Investigating the factors determining e-learning effectiveness in tourism and hospitality education. J. Hosp. Tour. Educ. 16(2), 11–21 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisson, L.G., Adams, A.R.: Essential hospitality management competencies: the importance of soft skills. J. Hosp. Tour. Educ. 25(3), 131–145 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting, D.H., Cheng, C.F.C.: Developing pro-environmental behaviour: ecotourism fieldtrip and experiences. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, J.: Tourism: a critical business. J. Travel Res. 46(3), 245–255 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C.-C.: The development of epistemic relativism versus social relativism via online peer assessment, and their relations with epistemological beliefs and internet self-efficacy. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(2), 309–316 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, F.F., Bishop, M.C., Ferdinand-James, D.: Instructional strategies to help online students learn: feedback from online students. TechTrends 61(5), 420–427 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R.: Declarative knowledge acquisition in immersive virtual learning environments. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(6), 1319–1333 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibel, D., Stricker, D., Wissmath, B.: The use of a virtual learning centre in the context of a university lecture: factors influencing satisfaction and performance. Interact. Learn. Environ. 20(1), 77–87 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, F., Buhalis, D., Weber, J.: Serious games and the gamification of tourism. Tour. Manag. 60, 244–256 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Z.: Unprecedented pandemic, unprecedented shift, and unprecedented opportunity. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2(2), 110–112 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Zhang, H., Chen, X.: Coronavirus pandemic and tourism: dynamic stochastic general equilibrium modeling of infectious disease outbreak. Ann. Tour. Res. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukselturk, E., Yildirim, Z.: Investigation of interaction, online support, course structure and flexibility as the contributing factors to students’ satisfaction in an online certificate program. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11(4), 51–65 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagonari, F.: Balancing tourism education and training. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 28(1), 2–9 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehrer, A., Mössenlechner, C.: Industry relations and curricula design in Austrian tourism master programs: a comparative analysis. J. Teach. Travel. Tour. 8(1), 73–95 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chung-Shing Chan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Duan, X., Chan, CS., Wong, I.A. (2020). Evaluating Online Tourism Education Quality by Using an Instructional Strategy Framework. In: Lee, LK., U, L.H., Wang, F.L., Cheung, S.K.S., Au, O., Li, K.C. (eds) Technology in Education. Innovations for Online Teaching and Learning. ICTE 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1302. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4594-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4594-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4593-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4594-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics