Skip to main content

Evolving Genetic Programming Models for Predicting Quantities of Adhesive Wear in Low and Medium Carbon Steel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Machine Learning Techniques

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

Abstract

Wear loss prediction is still essential in various industrial applications particularly the cutting tools. This process is quite sophisticated due to the relation between the interrelated variables. In this work, a genetic programming optimization model for predicting and optimizing the quantities of adhesive wear in low and medium carbon steel was generated. Carbon steel material was subjected to dry sliding wear experiments using a pin-on-disc module. Several parameters including the applied load, sliding speed and time were involved in the model. The proposed model was capable of predicting and optimizing the wear loss in carbon steel and was evaluated and tested using different performance criteria to ensure its reliability. The generated model can be utilized to monitor wear in mechanical components without requiring any human efforts to enhance the monitoring efficiency and reduce human errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://dev.heuristiclab.com.

References

  1. Abdelbary A, Abouelwafa MN, El Fahham IM, Hamdy AH (2012) Modeling the wear of polyamide 66 using artificial neural network. Mater Des 41:460–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamiak M, Górka J, Kik T (2009) Comparison of abrasion resistance of selected constructional materials. J Achieve Mater Manuf Eng 37(2):375–380

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Oqla FM, Omar AA (2012) A decision-making model for selecting the gsm mobile phone antenna in the design phase to increase over all performance. Progr Electromagnetics Res C 25:249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Oqla FM, Salit MA, Ishak MR, Aziz NA (2015) Selecting natural fibers for bio-based materials with conflicting criteria. Am J Appl Sci 12(1):64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beham A, Affenzeller M, Wagner S, Kronberger GK (2008) Simulation optimization with heuristiclab. In: The 20th European modeling and simulation symposium (EMSS2008), pp 75–80

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chan KY, Kwong CK, Dillon TS, Tsim YS (2011) Reducing overfitting in manufacturing process modeling using a backward elimination based genetic programming. Appl Soft Comput 11(2):1648–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang L, Friedrich K (2010) Enhancement effect of nanoparticles on the sliding wear of short fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a critical discussion of wear mechanisms. Tribol Int 43(12):2355–2364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Durmus HK, Ozkaya E, Dotc CM (2006) The use of neural networks for the prediction of wear loss and surface roughness of AA 6351 aluminium alloy. Mater Des 27(2):156–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eyre TS (1976) Wear characteristics of metals. Tribol Int 9(5):203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faris H, Sheta A (2013) Identification of the tennessee eastman chemical process reactor using genetic programming. Int J Adv Sci Technol 50:121–140

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faris H, Sheta A (2016) A comparison between parametric and non-parametric soft computing approaches to model the temperature of a metal cutting tool. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 29(1):64–75

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faris H, Sheta A, Öznergiz E (2013) Modelling hot rolling manufacturing process using soft computing techniques. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 26(8):762–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hakan C, Öztürk H, çelik E, Karlık B (2006) Artificial neural network-based prediction technique for wear loss quantities in mo coatings. Wear 261(10):1064–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu SM, Shen MC, Ruff AW (1997) Wear prediction for metals. Tribol Int 30(5):377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jahan A, Ismail MY, Sapuan SM, Mustapha F (2010) Material screening and choosing methods—a review. Mater Des 31(2):696–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jakobović D, Jelenković L, Budin L (2007) Genetic programming heuristics for multiple machine scheduling. In: European Conference on Genetic Programming. Springer, Berlin, pp 321–330

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kotanchek M, Smits G, Kordon A (2003) Industrial strength genetic programming. In: Riolo RL, Worzel B (eds) Genetic programming theory and practice. Kluwer, New York, pp 239–256

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Koza JR (1991) Evolving a computer program to generate random numbers using the genetic programming paradigm. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, La Jolla

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ren Qun, Balazinski Marek, Baron Luc, Jemielniak Krzysztof (2011) Tsk fuzzy modeling for tool wear condition in turning processes: an experimental study. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(2):260–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rizal M, Ghani JA, Nuawi MZ, Che Haron CH (2013) Online tool wear prediction system in the turning process using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput 13(4):1960– 1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheta AF, Rausch P, Al-Afeef AS (2012) A monitoring and control framework for lost foam casting manufacturing processes using genetic programming. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput 4(2):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wagner S Affenzeller M (2004) The heuristiclab optimization environment. Technical report, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang W (2007) A prognosis model for wear prediction based on oil-based monitoring. J Oper Res Soc 58(7):887–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossam Faris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Faris, R., Almasri, B., Faris, H., AL-Oqla, F.M., Dalalah, D. (2020). Evolving Genetic Programming Models for Predicting Quantities of Adhesive Wear in Low and Medium Carbon Steel. In: Mirjalili, S., Faris, H., Aljarah, I. (eds) Evolutionary Machine Learning Techniques. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9990-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics