Skip to main content

Qualitative Findings: Exploring RFEMF Risk Perceptions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Public Perceptions of Radiation Effects on Health Risks and Well-Being

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace ((BRIEFSSECUR,volume 33))

  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the results from Phase 1 of the study from qualitative data analysis. As mentioned in Chap. 2, the qualitative approaches adopted in this study involved in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The findings of the qualitative analysis are presented in relation to four main stakeholders: government agencies, telecommunication companies, non-government organisations (NGOs) and the general public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • 1Bestarinet.net. (2012). FAQ. http://btp.moe.gov.my/1bestarinet/article/165.

  • Astro Awani. (2014). Guru mempertikai projek 1Bestarinet (Teachers questioning 1Bestarinet project) [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.astroawani.com.

  • Dohle, S., Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Mobile communication in the public mind: Insights from free associations related to mobile phone base stations. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 18, 649–668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E. (2001). The roles of contextual moderation and personality in relation to the knowledge-risk link in workplace. Journal of Risk Research, 4, 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freimuth, V. S., Musa, D., Hilyard, K., Quinn, S. C., & Kim, K. (2014). Trust during the early stages of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs, Risk Analysis, 16(4), 473–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, L. A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S., Frewer, L. J., & Shepherd, R. (1999). Public trust in sources of information about radiation risks in the UK. Journal of Risk Research, 2, 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, I. (2013). With 1BestariNet, YTL eyes return on concessions scene. The Malay Mail. Retrieved from http://www.themalaymailonline.com.

  • Macoubrie, J. (2006). Nanotechnology: Public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. (2014). Our responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.skmm.gov.my.

  • Sidhu, B. K. (2012, April 10). RM663mil wireless access for 9,924 schools. The Star. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com.my/story/?file=%2f2012%2f4%2f10%2fbusiness%2f11075859&sec=.

  • Siegriest, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perceptions of hazard: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20, 713–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C., & Flores, F. (2001). Building trusts in business, politics, relationships, and life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussler, M., & Soroka, S. (2014). Consumer demand for cynical and negative news frames. International Journal of Press/Politics, 19, 360–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, M. (2007). Trust and risk: Implications for management. In M. Siegrist, T. C. Earl, & H. Gutscher (Eds.), Trust in cooperative risk management: Uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind. New York: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, M. (2008). Peer review: Benefits, perceptions and alternatives. Publishing Research Consortium, London. Retrieved from http://www.publishingresearch.org.uk/documents/PRCsummary4Warefinal.pdf.

  • Williams, D. E., & Olaniran, B. A. (1998). Expanding the crisis planning function: Introducing elements of risk communication to crisis communication practice. Public Relations Review, 24, 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2014). Electromagnetic fields and public health: Mobile phones. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/electromagnetic-fields-and-public-health-mobile-phones.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. D. Yusop .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yusop, F.D. (2020). Qualitative Findings: Exploring RFEMF Risk Perceptions. In: Public Perceptions of Radiation Effects on Health Risks and Well-Being. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace, vol 33. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9894-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics