Abstract
This paper argues that the notion of comfort is first and foremost related to subjective choices and individual value systems. The article presents results from research on the perception and measurements of the thermal qualities of heritage buildings in Lincolnshire, UK. The qualitative and quantitative results identified a strong contrast between different methodologies. Inhabitants describe as comfortable houses which would not be considered comfortable if a standard positivist approach was used. The conflict presented will be discussed in the context of sustainable strategies in architecture.
… not everything that can be counted counts,
and not everything that counts can be counted.
—William Bruce Cameron [1]
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Cameron, W.: Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking. Random House, New York (1963)
Maslow, A.: Theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50(4), 370–396 (1943)
Lupo, R.: A Measure of Net Well-Being that Incorporates the Effect of Housing Environmental Impacts. BRE, London (2014)
Schaller, M., Neuberg, S., Griskevicius, V., Kenrick, D.: Pyramid power: a reply to commentaries. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 335–337 (2010)
Fromm, E.: Anatomy of Human Deconstructiveness. Holt Reinehard and Winston, New York (1973)
Fromm, E.: The Sane Society. Routledge, London (2002)
Fouseki, K., Cassar, M.: Energy efficiency in heritage buildings—future challenges and research needs. Hist. Environ.: Policy & Pract. 5(2), 95–100 (2014)
Bourdieu, P.: Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Routledge, London (1984)
Lynch, K.: The Image of the City. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (1960)
Ingold, T.: The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood. In: Dwelling and Skill, Routledge, London (2000)
Tweed, C., Sutherland, M.: Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landscape Urban Plann. 83(1), 62–69 (2007)
Sunikka-Blank, M., Galvin, R.: Irrational homeowners? How aesthetics and heritage values influence thermal retrofit decisions in the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11, 97–108 (2015)
Department for Communities and Local Government: English Housing Survey Housing stock Report. DC&LG Publication London (2008)
Cousins, R.: Lincolnshire Buildings in the Mud and Stud Tradition. Heritage Trust of Lincolnshire, Sleaford (2000)
Barley, M.: Lincolnshire and the Fens, p. 28. B T Batford Ltd., London (1952)
Roberts, D.L.: The Vernacular buildings of Lincolnshire. Archaeological Journal 131, 298–308 (1974)
Field, N.: Withern cottage. In: Field, N., White, A. (eds.) A Prospect of Lincolnshire, pp. 92–5. Lincoln (1984)
Field, N.: Mainly Mud and Stud. In: Vernacular Architecture Group, Spring Conference: Lincoln (2016)
Glew, D.: New Mud-and-Stud Construction in England and the Problem of Thermal Insulation. In: Proceedings of Terra 2012 Terra 2012: XIth International Conference on the Study and Conservation of Earthen Architectural Heritage (22–27 April 2012), Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima (2012)
Glew, D.: Mud-and-Stud construction: compliance with modern planning and building regulations. In: English Heritage, Terra 2000 8th International Conference on The Study and Conservation of Earthen Architecture, pp. 139–143. Torquay, UK (2000)
Houben, H., Guillard, H.: Earth Construction: A Comprehensive Guide, Intermediate Technology Publication, p. 188. London (1994)
Kołakowski, M.: How to measure well-being in architecture: the benefits of using mixed-method research. Architectus 49(1), 15–32 (2017)
World Health Organization: The Effects of the Indoor Housing Climate on the Health of the Elderly (September). Graz (1982)
Collins, K.: Low indoor temperatures and morbidity in the elderly. Age Ageing 15(4), 212–220 (1986)
Minke, G.: Building with Earth: Design and Technology of a Sustainable Architecture, pp. 15–17. Birkhäuser, Berlin (2006)
Leaman, A., Bordass, B.: Are users more tolerant of ‘green buildings’? Build. Res. Inf. 635(6), 662–673 (2007)
Simon, H.A.: Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol. Rev. 63(2), 129–138 (1956)
Ibid. p. 136
Gou, Z., Prasad, D., Lau, S., Siu, Y.: Are green buildings more satisfactory and comfortable? Habitat Int. 39, 156–161 (2013)
Khoshbakht, M., et al.: Are green buildings more satisfactory? Rev. Glob. Evid. Habitat Int. 74, 57–65 (2018)
Deuble, M., de Dear R.: Green occupants for green buildings: the missing link? In: Proceedings of Conference: Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 9–11 April 2010. Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings, London (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kołakowski, M.M. (2020). Maslow in the Mud. Contrast Between Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Thermal Performance in Historic Buildings. In: Littlewood, J., Howlett, R., Capozzoli, A., Jain, L. (eds) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 163. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9868-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9868-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9867-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9868-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)