Skip to main content

The Relationships Among Attitude, Perceived Learning and Perceived Engagement of the Use of Tablet PCS for Students’ Learning in Hong Kong Higher Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Transactions on Engineering Technologies (IMECS 2018)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among attitude, perceived learning and perceived engagement of the use of tablet PCs for students’ learning in higher education. Questionnaire-based survey was conducted and 187 sample data were collected from students in different universities in Hong Kong. The findings show that there are positive correlations among attitude, perceived learning and perceived engagement of the use of tablet PCs for students’ learning in higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, J., Gerbing, D.: Structural modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-steps approach. Psychol. Bull. 10(3), 411–423 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bansavich, J.C., Yoshioka, K.: The iPad: implications for higher education. In: 2011 EDUCASE Annual Conference, vol. 19, October 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Briggs, S.R., Cheek, J.M.: The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J. Pers. 54(1), 106–148 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter, C.P., Reschly, A.L., Lovelace, M.D., Appleton, J.J., Thompson, D.: Measuring student engagement among elementary students: pilot of the student engagement instrument–elementary version. Sch. Psychol. Q. 27(2), 61–73 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Gayar, O.F., Moran, M.: College students’ acceptance of tablet PCs: an application of the UTAUT model. Dakota State University, 820 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. El-Gayar, O.F., Moran, M.: Examining students’ acceptance of tablet PC using TAM. Issues Inf. Syst. 8(1), 167–172 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Enriquez, A.G.: Enhancing student performance using tablet computers. Coll. Teach. 58(3), 77–84 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farnsworth, B.J., Shaha, S.H., Bahr, D.L., Lewis, V.K., Benson, L.F.: Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology: learning and attitudinal impacts on elementary students. J. Instr. Psychol. 29(3), 121–138 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Sage Publications, London (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.: Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 15, 282–388 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E.: How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., Swan, K.: Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 4(2), 7–41 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ho, R.: Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and Interpretation with SPSS. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Landis, R.N., Reschly, A.L.: Reexamining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. J. Educ. Gift. 36(2), 220–249 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liaw, S.S.: Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case study of the Blackboard system. Comput. Educ. 51(2), 864–873 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim, K.Y., Toto, R., Nguyen, H., Zappe, S.E., Litzinger, T., Wharton, M., Cimbala, J.: Impact of instructors use of the Tablet PC on student learning and classroom attendance (2008). http://search.asee.org/search/fetch;jsessionid=1ofr39vucpdwq?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2Fsearch%2Fconference%2F17%2FAC%25202008Full616.pdf&index=conference_papers&space=129746797203605791716676178&type=application%2Fpdf&charset=

  17. Mager, R.F.: Developing Attitude Toward Learning. ERIC (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Muijis, D.: Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Lowe, M.: Beginning Research: A Guide for Foundation Degree Students. Routledge, London (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometic Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  21. O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J.P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M.: Guidelines for Learning/Teaching/Tutoring in a Mobile Environment (2005). http://www.mobilearn.org/download/results/public_deliverables/MOBIlearn_D4.1_Final.pdf

  22. Partin, M.L., Haney, J.J., Worch, E.A., Underwood, E.M., Nurnberger-Haag, J.A., Gerhardt, M.W., Brown, K.G.: Individual differences in self-efficacy development: the effects of goal orientation and affectivity. Learn. Individ. Differ. 16(1), 43–59 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossing, J.P., Miller, W.M., Cecil, A.K., Stamper, S.E.: iLearning: the future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. 12(2), 1–26 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tenhet Jr., T.O.: An Examination of the Relationship between Tablet Computing and Student Engagement, Self-Efficacy, and Student Attitude Toward Learning. California State University, Fresno (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Toto, R., Wharton, M., Cimbala, J., Wise, J.: One Step Beyond: Lecturing With a Tablet PC (2006). http://search.asee.org/search/fetch?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE%3A%2Fsearch%2Fconference%2F12%2F2006Full1599.pdf&index=conference_papers&space=129746797203605791716676178&type=application%2Fpdf&charset=

  26. Vekiri, I., Chronaki, A.: Gender issues in technology use: perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Comput. Educ. 51(3), 1392–1404 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, S.H.: Exploring college students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. TOJET 11(4), 148–154 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yau, H.K., Leung, Y.F.: The relationship between self-efficacy and attitudes towards the use of technology in learning in Hong Kong Higher Education. In: Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2018, IMECS 2018. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, Hong Kong, 14–16 March, pp. 832–834 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hon Keung Yau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yau, H.K., Leung, Y.F. (2020). The Relationships Among Attitude, Perceived Learning and Perceived Engagement of the Use of Tablet PCS for Students’ Learning in Hong Kong Higher Education. In: Ao, SI., Kim, H., Castillo, O., Chan, As., Katagiri, H. (eds) Transactions on Engineering Technologies. IMECS 2018. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9808-8_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics