Abstract
Sri Lanka is one of the oldest democracies in South Asia. Since independence, successive governments expanded democratic institutions to include the people across the country. Although democracy expanded horizontally, to ensure greater inclusion of all communities irrespective of their race, creed and economic class, it is important for democracy to be expanded vertically as well. In this context, local government—the legislative institution closest to the people—plays a very crucial role in deepening democracy in Sri Lanka. However, contrary to its design, due to the nature of Sri Lankan politics, practices in local government often either hinder inclusion or sometimes reproduce exclusion temporarily. This paper seeks to explore this interesting contradiction in local governance in Sri Lanka. It also attempts to explain the paradoxical manner in which local government institutions in rural Sri Lanka, which are ideally designed to promote greater democracy and greater inclusion, actually operates in a manner that makes inclusion and exclusion extremely fluid and shaped by local level contingencies. This paper is developed primarily based upon field research conducted in three villages—Isurugama in Matale district and Welgala and Rambukkewela in Kandy district—in the Central Province of Sri Lanka. A phenomenological approach was used in this research. The paper approaches the research through the theory of social exclusion, which seeks to understand the many factors that prevent individuals and communities from enjoying equal access to resources, a life of dignity, and full participation in the life of the community.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Pradeshiya Saba is the term used to refer to one of the three types of local government institutions in Sri Lanka.
- 2.
The United People’s Freedom Alliance was in power at the national level between 1994 and 2015, except for the two years the United National Party was in power between late 2001 and early 2004.
- 3.
With the Presidential Election in January 2015 and the Parliamentary Election in August 2015, the United National Party led coalition came in to power at the national level.
- 4.
Maga Neguma was a project undertaken by the UPFA government aimed at constructing an effective network roads.
- 5.
Gama Neguma was a programme instituted by the UPFA government which aimed to expand rural social economic infrastructure required for the livelihood promotion of persons living in rural areas.
- 6.
When receiving funds from the PS, the village is expected to pay for labour or provide labour.
References
Dainis, A. P. (2015). Strengthening local government—issues, constraints and proposals for reform. In J. Uyangoda (ed.), Local government and local democracy: Institutional and social dimensions (pp. 73–116) Colombo: Social Scientists’ Association.
Duffy, K. (1995). Social exclusion and human dignity in Europe. Strasbourg’: Council of Europe.
Elections Commission. (2002). Local authorities election result 2002. Colombo: Government of Sri Lanka.
Elections Commission. (2006). Local authorities election result 2006. Colombo: Government of Sri Lanka.
Elections Commission. (2011). Local authorities election results 2011. Colombo: Government of Sri Lanka.
Gunasekara, T. (1992). Democracy, party competition and leadership: The changing power structure in sinhalese community. In J. Brow & J. Weeramunda (Eds.), Agrarian change in Sri Lanka (pp. 229–260). London: Sage Publication.
Kodikara, C. (2012). Women in local government from 2006 to 2011: A comparative analysis of representation of women and nomination for women. Colombo: International Centre for Ethnic Studies.
Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., & Levitas, R. (2006). Poverty and social exclusion in britain. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Rawal, N. (2008). Social inclusion and exclusion: A review. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 2, 161–180.
Sen, A. (2000). Social Exclusion: Concept. Application and Scrutiny, s.l.: Asian Development Bank.
Stoker, G. (1996). Redefining local democracy. In L. Pratchett, D. Wilson (eds.), Local democracy and local government. government beyond the centre. (pp. 188–209) London: Palgrave.
Uyangoda, J. (2011). Reforming local government. Colombo: Social Scientists’ Association.
Uyangoda, J. (2012). Local democracy and citizenship in the social margins. In J. Uyangoda, N. de Mel (eds.), Reframing democracy: Perspectives on the cultures of inclusion and exclusion in contemporary Sri Lanka. (pp. 29–89) Colombo: Social Scientists’Association.
Uyangoda, J. (2015). Local government as local democracy: Challenges in rural Sri Lanka. In J. Uyangoda (ed.), Local government and local democracy in Sri Lanka: institutional and social dimensions (pp. 196–243) Colombo: Social Scientists’Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silva, S., Schubert, M. (2019). Democratic Institutions in Sri Lanka’s Local-Level Politics: Challenges to Social Inclusion. In: Sekher, M., Carciumaru, R. (eds) Including the Excluded in South Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9759-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9759-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9758-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9759-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)