Skip to main content

A Genealogy of Becoming (and Being) in the First 1000 Days

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The First 1000 Days of Early Childhood

Abstract

This chapter sets the scene for an emphasis on ‘becoming’ for our youngest children living in a twenty-first-century global world. Taking the view that becoming (or Bildung) is now viewed as central to teaching and learning, a genealogy (Foucault M. The order of discourse. In Young R (ed) Untying the text: a post-structuralist reader. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 51–78, 1981) of its positioning in ECE is offered. Common philosophical and social beliefs concerning infant and toddler ‘becoming’ will be examined with consideration to the time and space of their orientation – historically, geographically and, by association, ideologically. In taking this approach, the chapter will then attempt to relocate ‘becoming’ through a contemplation of the conditions of its meaning in a globalised contemporary world. Through such means the chapter will speculate on what becoming offers (and simultaneously denies) the infant subject as he or she is located within pedagogical practice today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kantian orientations away from knowing this ‘thing’ in itself cannot pass by unnoticed in this interrogation; by bringing morality to bear on the concept of measurement, Kant and his followers provided an imperative that created an urgency in this regard. Kant (1948) sets a revised analytical path for measurement independent of its relation to ‘things’. Here mystery paves the way for various forms of aesthetic judgment that seek to give universal textuality to the forms of masked rationality that lurk beneath certainty and its limits. Formalist approaches to measurement further cement its locale by providing frameworks through which ‘things’ can be judged according to established criteria.

  2. 2.

    Heidegger’s uptake has been variable, and so, in a strange sense, he has been subjected to a becoming of sorts. He has been criticised for his Nazi sympathising (for fuller discussion, see, e.g. Young, 2010). Any writer on Heidegger is challenged with whether they should refer to him or not, and hence they themselves are uncomfortably ‘becoming’.

  3. 3.

    This description of Novalis’ encounter with something other may sound familiar to Hegelians, although there is one crucial difference between the early German Romantics and Hegel. Hegel would prove to be much more globally popular than the early German Romantics, but he would also offer a formalised approach to knowledge. The Romantics were less concerned with structure than inquiring into an enduring and imperceptible impact on the self. They believed, then, that the path to knowledge was infinite, where for Hegel this was not the case.

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and answerability (K. Brostrom, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldick, R., Raddice, B., &, Jones, C. A. (1976). Plato: The republic (D. Lee, Trans.). 2nd Ed. Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. (2017). The rediscovery of teaching. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boldt, G. (2017). Working with Deleuze and Guattari. In L. E. Cohen & S. Waite-Stupiansky (Eds.), Theories of early childhood education: Developmental, behaviourist and critical. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. (2007). Philosophy, language, and the titanic mind-set. Language & Ecology, 2(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In D. Banerji & M. R. Paranjape (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures. New Delhi, India: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, S., Press, F., & Sumsion, F. (2015). An encounter with the ‘sayings’ of curriculum: Levinas and the formalization of infants’ learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(8), 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2014). Listening to children: Being and becoming. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guttari, F. (1980/1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1950/1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 51–78). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goethe, J. W. (1989). Wilhelm Meister’s apprenticeship. In E. A. Blackall (Ed.), Goethe: The collected works. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D. (2011). Heraclitus. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/heraclitus/

  • Hegel, (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit [Phänomenologie des Geistes] (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1938/1977). The question concerning technology. In The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1967). Being and time (J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). New York: Perennial Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1997). Feminist philosophy and the philosophy of feminism: Irigaray and the history of western metaphysics. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00172.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1948). The moral law: Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (H. J. Paton, Trans.) London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S. (1845). Stages on life’s way (W. Lowrie, Trans.). Denmark: Bianco Luno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mika, C. (2014). The enowning of thought and whakapapa: Heidegger’s fourfold. Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 13, 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mika, C. (2015a). The thing’s revelation: Māori philosophical research. Waikato Journal of Education, 20(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v20i2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mika, C. (2015b). Thereness: Implications for Heidegger’s ‘presence’ for Māori. AlterNative, 11(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mika, C. (2017). Indigenous education and the metaphysics of presence: A worlded philosophy. Oxon, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, S. (1974). Inquiries into the fundamentals of aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Urban, M. (2017). The organisation for economic co-operation and development’s international early learning study: What happened next. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 18(2), 250–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzche, F. (1954). The portable Nietzsche. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novalis. (1960). Die Lehrlinge zu Sais. In P. Kluckhohn & R. Samuel (Eds.), Schriften: Das dichterische Werk (Vol. 1, pp. 71–111). Stuttgart, Deutschland: W. Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. (2012). Parmenides. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/parmenides/

  • Piaget, J. (1953). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, W. (2003). Heidegger: Through phenomenology to thought. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratigos, T., Bradley, B., & Sumsion, J. (2014). Infants, family day care and the politics of belonging. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(2), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, S. E. (1966). Socrates to Sartre: A history of philosophy. New York: McCraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. J. (2016). A philosophy of seeing: The work of the eye/‘I’ in early years educational practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(3), 474–489. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jope.2016.50.issue-3/issuetoc

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, E. J., & Odegaard, E. (2016). Bildungsroman and the early years. In M. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Singapore, Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J., & Mika, C. (2013). Coming of age? Infants and toddlers in curriculum. In J. Nuttall (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2010). Heidegger, philosophy, Nazism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Jayne White .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

White, E.J., Mika, C. (2019). A Genealogy of Becoming (and Being) in the First 1000 Days. In: The First 1000 Days of Early Childhood. Policy and Pedagogy with Under-three Year Olds: Cross-disciplinary Insights and Innovations, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9656-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9656-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9655-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9656-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics