Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

  • 219 Accesses

Abstract

There were three aspects to this research project and the findings have been reported in the previous chapters for the pre-phase, Phase 1 and Phase 2. The pre-phase had a professional development focus with students and teachers learning to investigate in science. One researcher did professional development and the other collected evidence of teacher and student learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Tineh, A. M., & Sadiq, H. M. (2018). Characteristics and models of effective professional development: The case of school teachers in Qatar. Professional Development in Education, 44(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1306788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, R. (2012). Caring teaching practices in multiethnic mathematics classrooms: Attending to health and well-being. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0028-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, R., & Clark, M. (2012). Respect in teaching and learning mathematics: Professionals who know, listen to and work with students. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., & Berryman, M. (2006). Culture speaks: Cultural relationships and classroom learning. Wellington: Huia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Tiakiwai, S., & Richardson, C. (2003). Te Kotahitanga: The experiences of year 9 and 10 Maori students in mainstream classrooms. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T., & Teddy, L. (2009). Te kotahitanga: Addressing educational disparities facing Māori students in New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 734–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, T., Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K., & Macfarlane, A. (2010). Culturally responsive pedagogy: Connecting New Zealand teachers of science with their Māori students. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 39(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1375/s1326011100000971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsworthy, A., Watson, R., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1998). Sometimes it’s not fair. Primary Science Review, 53, 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 70(256), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Schwartz, R. (2015). Measurement of NOS. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 704–708). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., & Berry, A. (2011). Making a case for improving practice: What can be learned about high-quality science teaching from teacher-produced cases? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 65–81). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, E., & Stewart, G. (2012). Out of place: Indigenous knowledge in the science curriculum. In B. J. Fraser et al. (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Springer international handbooks of education (Vol. 24, pp. 541–554). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, M., Hogue, M., & Rioux, J. (2018). The application of both-ways and two-eyed seeing pedagogy: Reflections on engaging and teaching science to post-secondary indigenous students. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1205–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. (2010). Analysing practical science activities to assess and improve their effectiveness. Hatfield: Association for Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R., Tiberghien, A., & Le Maréchal, J. F. (2002). Varieties of labwork: A way of profiling labwork tasks. In D. Psillos & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 9–20). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeed, A., & Anderson, D. (2018). Learning through school science investigation: Teachers putting research into practice. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. (2007). Achievement at Maori immersion and bilingual schools: Update for 2005 results. Wellington, NZ: Demographic and Statistical Analysis Unit (DSAU), Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nui, Te Rūnanga, & Office, Education Review. (2008). A framework for review and evaluation in Te Aho Matua Kura Kaupapa Māori. Wellington, NZ: Education Review Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2015). Practical work in science: Misunderstood and badly used? School Science Review, 96, 357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rofe, C., Moeed, A., Anderson, D., & Bartholomew, R. (2016). Science in an indigenous school: Insight into teacher beliefs about science inquiry and their development as science teachers. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 45(1), 2015, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2015.32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils’ understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. (2011). Science in the Māori medium curriculum: Assessment of policy outcomes in Pūtaiao education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(7), 724–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00557.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. (2017). A Māori crisis in science education? New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 14(1), 21–39. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v14i1.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, B. A., & Chiu, J. L. (2015). Professional development and teacher change: The missing leadership link. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9411-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azra Moeed .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moeed, A., Rofe, C. (2019). Whakakapi (Bringing Together) Discussion. In: Learning Through School Science Investigation in an Indigenous School. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9611-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9611-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9610-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9611-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics