Skip to main content

An Efficient Semiautomatic Active Contour Model of Liver Tumor Segmentation from CT Images

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Network Application Tools for Performance Management

Part of the book series: Asset Analytics ((ASAN))

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) image is one of the most extensively used imaging modalities for revealing and analyzing tumors as it has a higher spatial resolution, faster imaging speed relatively lower cost compared to MRI. The liver tumor volumetry requires the tumor segmentation in three dimensions which is performed manually tracing the tumor regions on slices which are tiresome and prolonged also, and the volume of manual demarcation is subjective. The major challenging task in liver tumor segmentation is due to the significant variation in location, shape, intensity and texture. This makes it difficult to develop a universal computer algorithm that is applicable for all cases. In this paper, an efficient semiautomatic technique for segmentation of liver tumor from CT images is proposed. The technique is based on semiautomated segmentation approach based on active contour segmentation using the level set method. The proposed approach consists of mainly four stages. In the first stage, the region of interest (ROI) image is initialized, which contains the liver tumor region in the CT image extraction using seed points; in the second stage, resampling and segmentation of ROI is done for reducing the noise and enhancing the boundaries; in the third stage, threshold values adjustment and seed point calculations are carried out; and in the fourth stage, the post-processing is done to extract and refine the liver tumor boundaries. The proposed technique is compared with the region growing algorithms that require filling holes and removing small connected components that can be achieved by using binary morphological operations: opening to remove small connected components and closing to fill holes. The liver tumors detected by the scheme were compared with those manually traced by experts, used as the ground truth results. The study was evaluated on two datasets of tumors. The proposed scheme obtained the Dice similarity coefficient 0.938 and the Jaccard similarity coefficient 0.883. The mean surface distance, the median surface distance and the maximal surface distance were 0.025, 0.712 and 2.828 mm, respectively. With the proposed scheme, the time requisite is reduced significantly and proves to be helpful to the observer in better visualizing the probable tumors inside the liver. The proposed method represents the 3D reconstruction of segmented tumors within the liver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. B.N. Li, C.K. Chui, S. Chang, S.H. Ong, A new unified level set method for semi-automatic liver tumor segmentation on contrast enhanced CT images. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(10), 9661–9668 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Heimann, B.V. Ginneken, M.A. Styner, Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 28(8), 1251–1265 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Ferlay, H.R. Shin, F. Bray, D. Forman, C. Mathers, D.M. Parkin, Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: Globocan 2008. Int. J. Cancer 127(12), 2893–2917 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. European Association for the Study of the Liver, Easl-eortc clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 56(4), 908–943 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Ray, R. Hagge, M. Gillen, M. Cerejo, S. Shakeri, L. Beckett, T. Greasby, R.D. Badawi, Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional iterative watershed segmentation methods in hepatic tumor volumetrics. Med. Phys. 35(12), 5869–5881 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L.N. Tran, M.S. Brown, J.G. Goldin, X. Yan, Comparison of treatment response classifications between, unidimensional, bidimensional and volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography. Acad. Radiol. 11(12), 1355–1360 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NLM: Imaging Methods Assessment and Reporting, http://hdl.handle.net/1926/586

  8. X. Deng, G. Du, M. Styner, 3D Segmentation in the clinic: A grand challenge II-liver tumor segmentation, in MICCAI Workshop, 2007, (2007), pp. 7–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Taha, A. Hanbury, Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: Analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med. Imag. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Cardenes, R. de Luis-Garcia, M. Bach-Cuadra, A multidimensional segmentation evaluation for medical image data. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 96(2), 108–124 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A.Q. Al-Faris, U.K. Ngah, N.A.M. Isa, I.L. Shuaib, MRI breast skin-line segmentation and removal using integration method of level set active contour and morphological thinning algorithms. J. Med. Sci. 12(8), 286–291 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K.H. Zou, S.K. Warfield, A. Baharatha, C. Tempany, M.R. Kaus, S.J. Haker et al., Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. Acad. Radiol. 11(2), 178–189 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K.H. Zou, W.M. Wells, R. Kikinis, S.K. Warfield, Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours. Stat. Med. 23(8), 1259–1282 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in MICCAI: LNCS, vol. 9351 (Springer, Berlin, 2015), pp. 234–241

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Li, X. Chen, F. Shi, W. Zhu, J. Tian, D. Xiang, Automatic liver segmentation based on shape constraints and deformable graph cut in CT images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24(12), 5315–5329 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Chartrand, T. Cresson, R. Chav, A. Gotra, A. Tang, J. DeGuise, Semi-automated liver CT segmentation using Laplacian meshes, in ISBI (IEEE, New York, 2014), pp. 641–644

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Li, X. Wang, S. Eberl, M. Fulham, Y. Yin, J. Chen, D.D. Feng, A likelihood and local constraint level set model for liver tumor segmentation from CT volumes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(10), 2967–2977 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Ben-Cohen, I. Diamant, E. Klang, M. Amitai, H. Greenspan, Fully convolutional network for liver segmentation and lesions detection, in International Workshop on Large-Scale Annotation of Biomedical Data and Expert Label Synthesis, LNCS, vol. 10008 (Springer, Berlin, 2016), pp. 77–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankur Biswas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Biswas, A., Bhattacharya, P., Maity, S.P. (2020). An Efficient Semiautomatic Active Contour Model of Liver Tumor Segmentation from CT Images. In: Pant, M., Sharma, T., Basterrech, S., Banerjee, C. (eds) Computational Network Application Tools for Performance Management. Asset Analytics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9585-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics