Abstract
This paper has the purpose of establishing the variables that explain the behavior of ResearchGate for the Top100 Latin American universities positioned in Webometrics database for January 2017. For this purpose, a search was carried out to get information about postgraduate courses and professors at the institutional websites and social networks, obtaining documents registered in Google Scholar. For the data analysis, the econometric technique of ordinary least squares was applied, a cross-sectional study for the year 2017 was conducted, and the individuals studied were the first 100 Latin American universities, obtaining a coefficient of determination of 73.82%. The results show that the most significant variables are the number of programs, the number of teacher’s profiles registered in Google Scholar, the number of subscribers to the institutional YouTube channel, and the GDP per capita of the university origin country. Variables such as (i) number of undergraduate programs, (ii) number of scientific journals; (iii) number of documents found under the university domain; (iv) H-index of the 1st profile of researcher at the university; (vi) number of members of the institution; (v) SIR Scimago ranking of Higher Education Institutions; (vi) number of tweets published in the institutional account; (vii) number of followers in the Twitter institutional account; (vii) number of “likes” given to the institutional count, were not significant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ReseachGate the network for science and research (2018). https://solutions.researchgate.net/recruiting/?utm_source=researchgate&utm_medium=community-loggedout&utm_campaign=indextop
Orduña-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., López-Cózar, E.D.: ResearchGate como fuente de evaluación científica: desvelando sus aplicaciones bibliométricas. El profesional de la información (EPI) 25(2), 303–310 (2016)
Yu, M.C., Wu, Y.C.J., Alhalabi, W., Kao, H.Y., Wu, W.H.: ResearchGate: an effective altmetric indicator for active researchers? Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 1001–1006 (2016)
Yan, W., Zhang, Y.: Research universities on the ResearchGate social networking site: an examination of institutional differences, research activity level, and social networks formed. J. Inform. 12(1), 385–400 (2018)
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K.: ResearchGate: disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(5), 876–889 (2015)
Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Ayllón, J.M., López-Cózar, E.D.: The counting house: Measuring those who count. Presence of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and altmetrics in the Google Scholar citations, Researcherid, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02412
Torres-Samuel, M., Vásquez, C.L., Viloria, A., Varela, N., Hernández-Fernandez, L., Portillo-Medina, R.: Analysis of patterns in the university world rankings webometrics, Shanghai, QS and SIR-SCimago: case Latin America. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Tang, Q. (eds.) DMBD 2018. LNCS, vol. 10943, pp. 188–199. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93803-5_18
Torres-Samuel, M., et al.: Efficiency analysis of the visibility of Latin American universities and their impact on the ranking web. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Tang, Q. (eds.) DMBD 2018. LNCS, vol. 10943, pp. 235–243. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93803-5_22
Vásquez, C., et al.: Cluster of the Latin American universities Top100 according to webometrics 2017. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Tang, Q. (eds.) DMBD 2018. LNCS, vol. 10943, pp. 276–283. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93803-5_26
Torres-Samuel, M., Vásquez, C., Viloria, A., Lis-Gutiérrez, J.P., Borrero, T.C., Varela, N.: Web visibility profiles of Top100 Latin American universities. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Tang, Q. (eds.) DMBD 2018. LNCS, vol. 10943, pp. 254–262. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93803-5_24
Ramanayaka, K.H., Chen, X., Shi, B.: Application of webometrics techniques for measuring and evaluating visibility of university library websites in Sri Lanka. J. Univ. Libr. Assoc. Sri Lanka 21(1), 1–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4038/jula.v21i1.7908
Jati, H.: University webometrics ranking using multicriteria decision analysis: entropy and TOPSIS method. Soc. Sci. 13(3), 763–765 (2018). http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/sscience/2018/763-765.pdf
Manoj, M.: Webometrics as a tool for measuring popularity of websites: an analysis of websites of IISERs in India. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Technol. 4(2), 1472–1476 (2018)
Cybermetrics Lab Webometrics Ranking of World Universities (2018). http://www.webometrics.info/en/About_Us
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Henao-Rodríguez, C., Lis-Gutiérrez, JP., Gaitán-Angulo, M., Vásquez, C., Torres, M., Viloria, A. (2019). Determinants of ResearchGate (RG) Score for the Top100 of Latin American Universities at Webometrics. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y. (eds) Data Mining and Big Data. DMBD 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1071. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9563-6_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9563-6_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9562-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9563-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)