Abstract
Earthquake damage assessment studies in urban cities are one of the leading problems because dense population is located in a small area. So, the study of damage probability of the buildings due to earthquakes particularly in urban cities have main focus, since it may end up brutal economic damage. The Chennai city, which is head quarters of Tamil Nadu state in Southern part of India, is an urbanized area, and it is categorized as fourth densely populated city in the country. The Chennai city is classified under moderate Seismic Hazard Zone (Zone III) by Bureau of Indian Standard. In this connection, a study has been carried out to understand the seismic vulnerability of the buildings in the Chennai city using geo-spatial techniques. FEMA 154 rapid visual screening methodology, which is modified suiting to Indian conditions, is used for the present study to assess the vulnerability in the built-up areas of the Chennai city, India. A foot print map was prepared for the part of Chennai city by visual interpretation and limited ground truth verification. Visual survey also carried out for sample buildings in the study area. Based on the survey, database is created in GIS platform for the different parameters, viz. age of the building, soil type, year of construction, number of stories, irregularities in the building, etc., for 2585 buildings. Based on the damage, probability for Magnitude 6.9 Score values was derived and the buildings in the areas classified from Grade 5 (high-probability damage) to Grade 1 (low-probability damage). Based on the study, totally 93% of buildings in the study area meet the earthquake resistance capability, and 7% of the buildings need further detailed structural evaluation for earthquake resistance. This study can be used as first-hand information for the researchers and administrators involved in earthquake emergency planning and decision making for Chennai city.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AGU/FEMA (2012) Buildings and earthquakes-which stands? which falls? Support document for teachable moment resources for Haiti produced by IRIS and the University of Portland: 16
Alam JM, Rahman Khan AM, Paul A (2008) Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing RC buildings in GIS environment. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China
BIS: 1893 Part-1. Indian Standard (2005) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 1—general provisions and buildings (fifth revision), ICS 91.120.25, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, Edition 6.1 (2005 – 01): 40
Census (2011) Provisional population totals, Tamil Nadu, Data Product No. 33-001-2011-Cen-E-Book (E), Paper 1 of 2011; p 67
CGWB Report (1993) Groundwater resources and development prospects in Madras District, Tamil Nadu. Internal report, Central Ground Water Board, Southern Region, Hyderabad, p 165
CMDA (2008) Second master plan for Chennai metropolitan area, 2026, vol I, II &III, Sept 2008. Chennai Metropolitan Authority, p 303
Dennen R (2011) Damage tops $90 million, Fredericksburg Free Lance Star, Sept 2011. http://fredericksburg.com/News?FLS/2011/092011/09292011/655155. Accessed on June 2013
FEMA (1998) Recommended rapid visual screening procedure. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), Washington DC
FEMA 154 (2002) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards. A handbook, 2nd edn. NEHRP
Feriche M, Vidal F, Garcia R, Navarro M, Vidal MD, Montilla P, Pinero L (2009) Earthquake damage scenarios in Velez-malaga urban area (Southern Spain) applicable to local emergency planning. In: Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on seismic microzoning and risk reduction. 15–18 Mar 2009, Almeria, Spain, pp 1–8
Ganapathy GP (2011) First level seismic microzonation map of Chennai city—a GIS approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:549–559
Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino SA (2004) Macroseismic method for the vulnerability assessment of buildings. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, pp 896–897
Grunthal G (ed) (1998) European macroseismic scale. http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/pb1/pg2/ems_new/INDEX.HTM. Accessed on 14 Jan 2013
GSI (2005) District resource map of Chennai. Geological Survey of India (GSI), Hyederabad
Guragain J (2004) GIS for seismic building loss estimation: a case study from Lalitpur sub-metropolitan city area, Kathmandu, Nepal. Ph.D. dissertation, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation Enschede, The Netherlands, p 95
Horton JW, Williams RA (2013) The 2012 Virginia earthquake: what are scientists learning? EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 93(33):317–324
Inel M, Senel SM, Toprak S, Manav Y (2008) Seismic risk assessment of buildings in urban areas: a case study for Denizli, Turkey. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9187-1
Irizarry J, Lantada N, Pujades LG, Barbat AH, Goula X, Susanga T, Roca A (2011) Ground-shaking scenarios and urban risk evaluation of Barcelona using risk-UE capacity spectrum based method. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9222-6
Kamatchi P, Balaji Rao K, Arunchalam S, Iyer Nagesh R (2011) Methodologies for vulnerability assessment of built environment subjected to earthquakes. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4(6):183–188
Lang K (2002) Seismic vulnerability of exiting buildings. Ph.D. dissertation, ETH no. 14446, pp 190–191
Lantada N, Pujades LG, Barbar AH (2008) Urban seismic risk evaluation through GIS techniques—application to Barcelona City, Spain. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, 12–17 Oct 2008, Beijing, China
Mouroux P, Brun BL (2006) Presentation of risk UE project. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9020-3
Pittore M, Wieland M (2012) Towards a rapid probabilistic seismic vulnerability assessment using satellite and ground based remote sensing. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0475-z
Rueda J, Mezcua J, Garcia Blanco RM (2011) Directivity effects of the May 11, 2011 Lorca (Spain) Mw = 5.1 earthquake, seismology source posters S 53-B, 2277, AGU fall meeting-2011, San Francisco, California, USA
Sarris A, Loupasakis C, Soupios P, Trigkas V, Valliantos F (2009) Earthquake vulnerability and seismic risk assessment of urban areas in high seismic regions: application to Chania City, Crete Island, Greece. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9475z
Sinha R, Goyal A (2001) A national policy for seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings and procedure for rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic vulnerability, Special report, IIT Bombay, pp 1–12
Trendafiloski G, Wyss M, Rosset P (2009) Loss estimation module in the second generation software QLARM. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on disaster casualties, 15–16 June 2009, University of Cambridge, UK, pp 1–10
Wieland M, Pittore M, Parolai S, Zschau J, Moldobekov B, Begaliev U (2012) Estimating building inventory for rapid seismic vulnerability assessment: towards an integrated approach based on multi-source imaging. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 36:70–83
Acknowledgements
This study is done as a part of ISRO project-ISRO/RES/4/548/09-10. The authors are thankful to Space Application Centre (SAC), Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), Government of India for funding under RESPOND program and thanks to Dr. A. S. Rajawat, Focal Person for this Project. The authors acknowledge all the facilities provided by Dr. G. Viswanathan, Chancellor, VIT University, Vellore, India for conducting this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ganapathy, G.P., Manoharan, S.G. (2020). Geo-spatial Approach for Likelihood Damage Assessment of Buildings Due to Seismic Hazard in Urbanized Areas. In: Pal, I., von Meding, J., Shrestha, S., Ahmed, I., Gajendran, T. (eds) An Interdisciplinary Approach for Disaster Resilience and Sustainability. MRDRRE 2017. Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9527-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9527-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9526-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9527-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)