Skip to main content

Frameworks and Guidelines for Socio-economic Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Socio-Economic Impact Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops

Abstract

The most important challenge in Socio-Economic Assessment (SEA) lies in developing suitable frameworks and guidelines that can be implemented. As many factors and values have to be considered in any such assessment, inevitably issues on methodologies and approaches have to be addressed. Since SE Assessment goes beyond traditional economic assessment including Cost–Benefit Analysis, any discussion on SEA will also be a discussion on alternative frameworks, methodologies and bringing together economic factors and non-economic factors. This chapter discusses the approaches explained in the literature to estimate the various impacts and what costs and factors are considered in different methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/farming-natural-resources-and-industry/natural-resource-use/land-water-use/crown-land/land-use-plans-and-objectives/policies-guides/seea_guidelines_lup_rmp.pdf.

  2. 2.

    On SLOs see van Putten et al. (2018).

  3. 3.

    See Sanchez et al. (2016) for an example of such an analysis.

  4. 4.

    In fact there are not many studies that look into gender dimension in adoption of LMOs. A much cited study (Subramanian et al. 2010) shows that cultivation of Bt crops has positive impacts on women’s employment.’

References

  • Brnjaš, Z., Ćurčić, M., & Stošić, I. (2015). Assessment of the socio-economic impact of the chemicals environmental contamination. Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, International Review (2015, No. 1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes., G., & Barfoot, P. (2015). Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2013: Impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops & Food, 6, 103–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • COGEM. (2014). Building blocks for an assessment framework for the cultivation of genetically-modified crops. COGEM Report CGM/141222-01. The Hague: COGEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck-Zepeda, J., Cohen, J., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Komen, J. (2002). Biotechnology and sustainable livelihoods—Findings and recommendations of an international consultation. Briefing Paper 54. The Hague: ISNAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2009). Assessing the socio-economic impacts of non-transgenic biotechnologies in developing countries. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, K., Smyth, S. J., & Falck-Zepeda, J. (Eds.). (2014). Socio-economic considerations in biotechnology regulation. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick, R. S. (2001). Measuring the livelihood impact of agricultural research. Paper presented at the ISNAR consultation “Biotechnology and Rural Livelihood— Enhancing the Benefits”, held in June 2001, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAS. (2016). Genetically engineered crops: Experiences and prospects. Washington D.C.: NAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz, D., & Janssen (Eds.). (2014). Socio-economic impacts of bioenergy production. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, M. A., et al. (2016). Outcrossing potential between 11 important genetically modified crops and the Chilean vascular flora. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 14, 625–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, A., Kirwan, K., Pink, D., & Qaim, M. (2010). GM crops and gender issues. Nature Biotechnology, 28, 404–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2017). Guidance on socio-economic assessment for national implementation plan development and implementation under the Stockholm Convention Nairobi: UNEP. http://chm.pops.int/Implementation/NationalImplementationPlans/Guidance/tabid/7730/ctl/Download/mid/20995/Default.aspx?id=1&ObjID=25543. Last accessed 1 July 2019.

  • van Putten, I., Cvitanovic, C., Fulton, B., Lacey, J., & Kelly, R. (2018). The emergence of social licence necessitates reforms in environmental regulation. Ecology and Society, 23(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna Ravi Srinivas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chaturvedi, S., Srinivas, K.R., Kumar, A. (2019). Frameworks and Guidelines for Socio-economic Assessment. In: Chaturvedi, S., Srinivas, K. (eds) Socio-Economic Impact Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9511-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9511-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9510-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9511-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics