Skip to main content

Teaching Through Ethical Tensions: Between Social Justice, Authority and Professional Codes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter focusses on how preservice teachers in particular can develop an ethical sensitivity to situations they find themselves in while at the same time responding critically to their unexamined assumptions and intuitions to ensure that their responses may be socially just. As the author argues, making moral decisions is not easy at the best of times and ethical dilemmas are strange things, not amenable to easy description or formulaic construction or resolution. The pedagogical value of a dilemma for teacher professional development is not necessarily to be found in sensational confrontation. Instead, every day and often very subtle or complex tensions and situations that can be easily overlooked, may provide instructive ethical stimuli. This chapter identifies key tensions that occur between teachers’ sense of moral agency and values with a focus on questions of justice. Teachers struggle with questions of distributive justice and educational disadvantage including deficit thinking, resource allocation, streaming, stereotyping, dehumanising ‘behaviour management’ of student bodies, and encounters with power inequities and school hierarchies. Examples and analysis of preservice teachers are presented in order to explore different ways of understanding justice and modes of ethical authority. Forster argues that social justice is the ‘bottom line’ for teacher education and this chapter raises questions about justice and who is most deserving to explore different conceptualisations arising in preservice teacher ethical reflections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The trolley problem is neatly described in the following excerpt from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/doing-allowing/ and the thought experiment has propagated a multitude of memes which attempt to outdo each other in terms of philosophical complexity see: http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/08/trolley-problem-meme-tumblr-philosophy.html.

  2. 2.

    DER: Digital Education Revolution scheme- a federally funded scheme between 2009 and 2013 which provided laptops to school students. See: http://www.dec.nsw.gov.au/detresources/about-us/how-we-operate/national-partnerships/digital-education-revolution/news/bulletins/clbulletin10.pdf. It has been largely overcome by BYOD policies- Bring Your Own Device, which allows students to bring their own, sometimes more cutting-edge technology to school (depending on wealth).

References

  • Aultman, L. P., Williams-Johnson, M. R., & Schutz, P. A. (2009). Boundary dilemmas in teacher–student relationships: Struggling with “the line”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 636–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teachings and School Leadership. (2011). Australian professional standards for teaching. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/.

  • Bartels, D. M., Bauman, C. W., Cushman, F. A., Pizarro, D. A., & McGraw A. P. (2015). Moral judgment and decision making. In G. Keren & G. Wu (Eds.), The wiley blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2004). Education, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained? Educational Theory, 54(3), 232–250. (Boulder & London: Paradigm Publishers).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement. Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. J., & Maxwell, B. (2016). Ethics education in Australian preservice teacher programs: A hidden imperative. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. (2003). The ethical teacher. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A., Forster, D., & Buchanan, R. (2013). The moral imagination in pre‐service teacher’s ethical reasoning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), Article 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigman, R. (2000). Ethical confidence in education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(4), 643–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colnerud, G. (1997). Ethical conflicts in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(6), 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colnerud, G. (2003). Moral dimensions of teaching. An essay review of ‘Exploring the moral heart of teaching. Towards a teacher's creed.’ David T. Hansen, Teachers College Press, New York, 2001. In: Teaching and Teacher Education, 19 (2003) pp. 559–561. Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(5), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, D. J. (2012). Codes of ethics in Australian education: Towards a national perspective. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(9), Article 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1996). Social justice in he age of identity politics: Redistributions, recognition, and participation. The tanner lectures on human values. Delivered at Standford University, April 30–May 2, 1996. Available at: https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-toz/f/Fraser98.pdf.

  • Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2000). Just schooling: Exploration in the cultural politics of teaching. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glegg, A. (2003). Creating right-minded teachers: British Columbia, 1872–2002. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 7(1), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonski, D., Arcus, T., Boston, K., Gould, V., Johnson, W., O’Brien, L. et al. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, O., & Wildy, H. (2016). The effects of streaming in the secondary school on learning outcomes for Australian students—A review of the international literature. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2012). Schooling and social justice through the lenses of Nancy Fraser. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladwig, J. G., & McPherson, A. (2017). The anatomy of ability. Curriculum Inquiry, 47(4), 344–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, M., & Fay, J. (2016). Dilemmas of educational ethics: Cases and commentaries. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, M. (2017). Why we need a field of educational ethics. Keynote presented on Sunday 3rd December at the Philosophy of education society of Australasia 47th annual conference, birth, death and rebirth: Does philosophy of education need a new subject? 1 - 5 Dec 2017, Crowne Plaza, Newcastle, Australia. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zg1RXRt-V-I&feature=youtu.be.

  • Lovat, T. (2005). The national framework for values education: Implications for teacher research. New Horizons in Education, 112, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2010). Documenting reproduction and inequality: Revisiting Jean Anyon’s “social class and school knowledge”. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M. (1990). Dilemmas of knowing: Ethical and epistemological dimensions of teachers’ work and development. Harvard Educational Review, 60(2), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, B., Tremblay‐Laprise, A., Filion, M. Boon, H., vanden Hoven, M., Heilbronn, R. et al. (2016). A five‐country survey on ethics education in pre‐service teaching programs. Journal of Teacher Education (date pending publication, personal communication).

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, T. (2014). Moral Dilemmas. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Fall 2014. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-dilemmas/.

  • Mills, C., & Ballantyne, J. (2016). Social justice and teacher education: a systematic review of empirical work in the field. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116660152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2001). Recognitive justice: Renewed commitment to socially just schooling. In B. A. Knight & L. Rowan (Eds.), Researching in contemporary educational environments (pp. 64–83). Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2010). The maternal factor: two paths to morality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J., & Cocking, D. (2006). Virtue ethics and professional roles. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, D., Biesta, G., & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, N., Green, S. K., Johnson, R. L., & Mitchell, M. (2009). Examining teacher ethical dilemmas in classroom assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 778–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), Handbook of global education policy (pp. 128–145). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2011). Teachers’ critical incidents: Ethical dilemmas in teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 648–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2016). From ethical reasoning to teacher education for social justice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I. (1999). What is critical literacy? Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism and Practice, 1(4), Article 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R., & Oğuz, E. (2013). Teachers’ views on values education: A qualitative study in Sweden and Turkey. International Journal of Educational Research, 59, 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2009). Guidelines for the design and effective use of teacher codes of conduct. Programme Specialist, Poisson, M. United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP, Paris, France). http://teachercodes.iiep.unesco.org/index.php?lang=EN.

  • van Nuland, S. (2009). Teacher codes. Learning from experience. Paris UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000185872.

  • Walker, M. (2003). Framing social justice in education: What does the ‘capabilities’ approach offer? British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 168–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnick, B. R., & Silverman, S. K. (2011). A framework for professional ethics courses in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniella J. Forster .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Forster, D.J. (2019). Teaching Through Ethical Tensions: Between Social Justice, Authority and Professional Codes. In: Webster, R., Whelen, J. (eds) Rethinking Reflection and Ethics for Teachers. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9401-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9401-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9400-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9401-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics