Advertisement

Renegotiating Reflective and Ethical Practice in a Liquid Education System

  • Andrew SkourdoumbisEmail author
  • Sue Bennett
Chapter

Abstract

Skourdoumbis and Bennett draw attention to the constantly changing global environment in which education systems are embedded and to which they have been required to respond. Drawing on Zygmunt Bauman’s characterisation of the apparently ‘liquid’ economic, social and political environments that characterise late modernity in which it seems nothing is solid, irreplaceable, permanent or in a sense deeply trustworthy and dependable, they discuss the consequences for education. The global response has been widely described as a neo-liberal response with its characteristic demands for accountability, efficiency and compliance with standards monitored through management and policy strategies that require measurable outcomes. The consequences for teachers’ work in this environment of increasingly routine procedures and decreasing professional autonomy are deeply troubling. Teachers are increasingly drawn away from the personal, humane and community relations that they still know are the fundamental characteristics of their daily work and are confronted with ethical issues, if not crises, arising from the apparently contradictory discourses of audit, accountability and compliance that constrain them. The authors illustrate these moments of ethical confrontation with reference to typical challenges faced daily by teachers as they strive to retain a sense of authentic endeavour.

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ayers, W. (1995). Becoming a teacher. In W. Ayers (Ed.), To become a teacher. Making a difference in children’s lives. NY and London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ballet, K., Kelchtermans, G., & Loughran, J. (2006). Beyond intensification towards a scholarship of practice: Analysing changes in teachers’ work lives. Teachers and Teaching, 12(2), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltodano, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and the demise of public education: The corporatization of schools of education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(4), 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. (2009). Does ethics have a chance in a world of consumers?. Cambridge, US: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Biesta, G. (2015). Resisting the seduction of the global education measurement industry: Notes on the social psychology of PISA. Ethics and Education, 10(3), 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burrows, R. (2012). Living with the h-index? Metric assemblages in the contemporary academy. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr, M., & Claxton, G. (2002). Tracking the development of learning dispositions. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9(1), 9–37.Google Scholar
  10. Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The common core state standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connell, R. A. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2008). Engaging minds. Changing teaching in complex times. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. de Ruyter, D. J., & Kole, J. J. (2010). Our teachers want to be the best: On the necessity of intra-professional reflection about moral ideals of teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(2), 207–218.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903478474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds) (1998) The essential dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, education, democracy. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1997). Experience & education. NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  16. Gerrard, J. (2017). The state of public schooling. In T. Bentley & G. C. Savage (Eds.), Educating Australia. Challenges for the decade ahead (pp. 55–67). Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gill, R. (2013). Breaking the silence. In R. Ryan-flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 228–244). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Giroux, H. A. (2004). The terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Griffiths, M. (2014). Encouraging imagination and creativity in the teaching profession. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardy, I., & Grootenboer, P. (2016). Cultivating community: Detailing school and community engagement under complex conditions. Teaching Education, 27(1), 21–38.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2015.1034683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London, UK: Cassell.Google Scholar
  22. Hursh, D. W. (2015). The end of public schools. The corporate reform agenda to privatize education. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hursh, D. (2008). High-stakes testing and the decline of teaching and learning. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  24. Joshi, D., & Smith, W. (2012). Education and inequality: Implications of the world bank’s education strategy 2020. In Education strategy in the developing world: Revising the world bank’s education policy (pp. 173–202). Published online: 08 March 2015.Google Scholar
  25. Lingard, B., Martion, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lingard, B., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashti, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). Globalizing educational accountabilities. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). ‘Catalyst data’: Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 634–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lipman, P. (2013). Economic crisis, accountability, and the state’s coercive assault on public education in the USA. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lupton, R., & Hempel-Jorgensen, A. (2012). The importance of teaching: Pedagogical constraints and possibilities in working-class schools. Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univesity Press.Google Scholar
  31. McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Moon, J. (2005). Guide for busy academics No. 4: Learning through reflection. Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  33. Olssen, M., & Peters, Michael A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Neill, J., & Bourke, R. (2010). Educating teachers about a code of ethical conduct. Ethics and Education, 5(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slater, G. B. (2015). Education as recovery: Neoliberalism, school reform, and the politics of crisis. Journal of Education Policy, 30(1), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.904930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, W. C. (2014). The global transformation toward testing for accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(116). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22.1571.
  38. Strathern, A. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Suspitsyna, T. (2010). Accountability in American education as a rhetoric and a technology of governmentality. Journal of Education Policy, 25(5), 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations