Abstract
Although Tau is an intrinsically disordered protein, some level of structure can still be defined, corresponding to short stretches of dynamic secondary structures and a preferential global fold described as an ensemble of conformations. These structures can be modified by Tau phosphorylation, and potentially other post-translational modifications. The analytical capacity of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provides the advantage of offering a residue-specific view of these modifications, allowing to link specific sites to a particular structure. The cis or trans conformation of X-Proline peptide bonds is an additional characteristic parameter of Tau structure that is targeted and modified by prolyl cis/trans isomerases. The challenge in molecular characterization of Tau lies in being able to link structural parameters to functional consequences in normal functions and dysfunctions of Tau, including potential misfolding on the path to aggregation and/or perturbation of the interactions of Tau with its many molecular partners.
Graphical Abstract
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahuja P, Cantrelle F-X, Huvent I, et al. Proline Conformation in a Functional Tau Fragment. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.023.
Amniai L, Barbier P, Sillen A, et al. Alzheimer disease specific phosphoepitopes of Tau interfere with assembly of tubulin but not binding to microtubules. FASEB J. 2009;23:1146–52. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-121590.
Bibow S, Ozenne V, Biernat J, et al. Structural impact of proline-directed pseudophosphorylation at AT8, AT100, and PHF1 epitopes on 441-residue tau. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:15842–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja205836j.
Biernat J, Mandelkow EM, Schroter C, et al. The switch of tau protein to an Alzheimer-like state includes the phosphorylation of two serine-proline motifs upstream of the microtubule binding region. EMBO J. 1992;11:1593–7.
Binder LI, Frankfurter A, Rebhun LI. The distribution of tau in the mammalian central nervous system. J Cell Biol. 1985;101:1371–8.
Black MM, Slaughter T, Moshiach S, et al. Tau is enriched on dynamic microtubules in the distal region of growing axons. J Neurosci. 1996;16:3601–19.
Bourré G, Cantrelle FX, Kamah A, et al. Direct Crosstalk Between O-GlcNAcylation and Phosphorylation of Tau Protein Investigated by NMR Spectroscopy. Front Endocrinol. 2018; 9:595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00595.
Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, et al. Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;112:389–404.
Butner KA, Kirschner MW. Tau protein binds to microtubules through a flexible array of distributed weak sites. J Cell Biol. 1991;115:717–30.
Chambraud B, Sardin E, Giustiniani J, et al. A role for FKBP52 in Tau protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:2658–63. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914957107.
Despres C, Byrne C, Qi H, et al. Identification of the Tau phosphorylation pattern that drives its aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:9080–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708448114.
Eichner T, Kutter S, Labeikovsky W, et al. Molecular Mechanism of Pin1-Tau Recognition and Catalysis. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:1760–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.009.
Fischer D, Mukrasch MD, Biernat J, et al. Conformational changes specific for pseudophosphorylation at serine 262 selectively impair binding of tau to microtubules. Biochemistry. 2009;48:10047–55.
Fitzpatrick AWP, Falcon B, He S, et al. Cryo-EM structures of tau filaments from Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2017;547:185–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23002.
Gandhi NS, Landrieu I, Byrne C, et al. A phosphorylation-induced turn defines the Alzheimer’s disease AT8 antibody epitope on the Tau protein. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:6819–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201501898.
Giustiniani J, Guillemeau K, Dounane O, et al. The FK506-binding protein FKBP52 in vitro induces aggregation of truncated Tau forms with prion-like behavior. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 2015;29:3171–81. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.14-268243.
Goedert M, Spillantini MG, Jakes R, et al. Multiple isoforms of human microtubule-associated protein tau: sequences and localization in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 1989;3:519–26.. doi: 0896-6273(89)90210-9 [pii]
Goode BL, Feinstein SC. Identification of a novel microtubule binding and assembly domain in the developmentally regulated inter-repeat region of tau. J Cell Biol. 1994;124:769–82.
Himmler A, Drechsel D, Kirschner MW, Martin DW Jr. Tau consists of a set of proteins with repeated C-terminal microtubule-binding domains and variable N-terminal domains. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9:1381–8.
Hoover BR, Reed MN, Su J, et al. Tau mislocalization to dendritic spines mediates synaptic dysfunction independently of neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2010;68:1067–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.030.
Jeganathan S, von Bergen M, Brutlach H, et al. Global hairpin folding of tau in solution. Biochemistry. 2006;45:2283–93. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0521543.
Jeganathan S, Hascher A, Chinnathambi S, et al. Proline-directed pseudo-phosphorylation at AT8 and PHF1 epitopes induces a compaction of the paperclip folding of Tau and generates a pathological (MC-1) conformation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:32066–76. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M805300200.
Kamah A, Huvent I, Cantrelle F-X, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of the acetylation pattern of the neuronal Tau protein. Biochemistry. 2014;53:3020–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi500006v.
Kamah A, Cantrelle FX, Huvent I, et al. Isomerization and Oligomerization of Truncated and Mutated Tau Forms by FKBP52 are Independent Processes. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:1080–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.015.
Katsinelos T, Zeitler M, Dimou E, et al. Unconventional Secretion Mediates the Trans-cellular Spreading of Tau. Cell Rep. 2018;23:2039–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.056.
Kondo A, Shahpasand K, Mannix R, et al. Antibody against early driver of neurodegeneration cis P-tau blocks brain injury and tauopathy. Nature. 2015;523:431–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14658.
Kutter S, Eichner T, Deaconescu AM, Kern D. Regulation of Microtubule Assembly by Tau and not by Pin1. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:1742–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.010.
Landrieu I, Lacosse L, Leroy A, et al. NMR analysis of a Tau phosphorylation pattern. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:3575–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja054656+.
Liou YC, Sun A, Ryo A, et al. Role of the prolyl isomerase Pin1 in protecting against age-dependent neurodegeneration. Nature. 2003;424:556–61.
Lippens G, Wieruszeski JM, Leroy A, et al. Proline-directed random-coil chemical shift values as a tool for the NMR assignment of the tau phosphorylation sites. Chembiochem. 2004;5:73–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200300763.
Lu PJ, Wulf G, Zhou XZ, et al. The prolyl isomerase Pin1 restores the function of Alzheimer-associated phosphorylated tau protein. Nature. 1999;399:784–8.
Malia TJ, Teplyakov A, Ernst R, et al. Epitope mapping and structural basis for the recognition of phosphorylated tau by the anti-tau antibody AT8. Proteins. 2016;84:427–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.24988.
Mukrasch MD, Markwick P, Biernat J, et al. Highly populated turn conformations in natively unfolded tau protein identified from residual dipolar couplings and molecular simulation. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:5235–43.
Mukrasch MD, Bibow S, Korukottu J, et al. Structural polymorphism of 441-residue tau at single residue resolution. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e34. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000034.
Nakamura K, Greenwood A, Binder L, et al. Proline isomer-specific antibodies reveal the early pathogenic tau conformation in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 2012;149:232–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.016.
Schneider A, Biernat J, von Bergen M, et al. Phosphorylation that detaches tau protein from microtubules (Ser262, Ser214) also protects it against aggregation into Alzheimer paired helical filaments. Biochemistry. 1999;38:3549–58.
Schwalbe M, Ozenne V, Bibow S, et al. Predictive atomic resolution descriptions of intrinsically disordered hTau40 and alpha-synuclein in solution from NMR and small angle scattering. Structure. 2014;22:238–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2013.10.020.
Schwalbe M, Kadavath H, Biernat J, et al. Structural Impact of Tau Phosphorylation at Threonine 231. Structure. 2015;23:1448–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2015.06.002.
Sibille N, Huvent I, Fauquant C, et al. Structural characterization by nuclear magnetic resonance of the impact of phosphorylation in the proline-rich region of the disordered Tau protein. Proteins. 2012;80:454–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.23210.
Smet C, Leroy A, Sillen A, et al. Accepting its random coil nature allows a partial NMR assignment of the neuronal Tau protein. Chembiochem. 2004a;5:1639–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200400145.
Smet C, Sambo AV, Wieruszeski JM, et al. The peptidyl prolyl cis/trans-isomerase Pin1 recognizes the phospho-Thr212-Pro213 site on Tau. Biochemistry. 2004b;43:2032–40. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi035479x.
Smet-Nocca C, Broncel M, Wieruszeski JM, et al. Identification of O-GlcNAc sites within peptides of the Tau protein and their impact on phosphorylation. Mol BioSyst. 2011;7:1420–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0mb00337a.
Sottejeau Y, Bretteville A, Cantrelle F-X, et al. Tau phosphorylation regulates the interaction between BIN1’s SH3 domain and Tau’s proline-rich domain. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-015-0237-8.
Sultan A, Nesslany F, Violet M, et al. Nuclear tau, a key player in neuronal DNA protection. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:4566–75. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.199976.
von Bergen M, Friedhoff P, Biernat J, et al. Assembly of tau protein into Alzheimer paired helical filaments depends on a local sequence motif ((306)VQIVYK(311)) forming beta structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:5129–34.. doi: 97/10/5129 [pii]
Wang Y, Balaji V, Kaniyappan S, et al. The release and trans-synaptic transmission of Tau via exosomes. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-016-0143-y.
Weingarten MD, Lockwood AH, Hwo SY, Kirschner MW. A protein factor essential for microtubule assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975;72:1858–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Danis, C. et al. (2019). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Insights into Tau Structure in Solution: Impact of Post-translational Modifications. In: Takashima, A., Wolozin, B., Buee, L. (eds) Tau Biology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1184. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9358-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9358-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9357-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9358-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)