Advertisement

Ethical Issues in Reporting on Teacher Candidate Perspectives in a Cultural Diversity Course: Increasing Trustworthiness, Protecting Participants, and Improving Practice

  • Julian KitchenEmail author
Chapter
First Online:
  • 221 Downloads
Part of the Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices book series (STEP, volume 20)

Abstract

While the study of practice is first and foremost for our current and future teacher candidates, teacher educators’ research into practice is also aimed at improvement in the wider education community. Thus, self-studies of practice must also be guided by ethical purposes: improving practice, demonstrating trustworthiness as research, and, most importantly, ensuring that teacher candidates are safe while the research is conducted and after it has been disseminated. This chapter focuses on the ethical issues raised by reporting on teacher candidates perspectives in a cultural diversity course in which many controversial issues are raised. The benefits of collecting and reporting teacher candidate perspectives are juxtaposed with the risks relation to four themes. The first theme, increasing trustworthiness, addresses the value of this type of research to the field of teacher education and the steps taken to ensure rigour and trustworthiness. The second, protecting participants in scholarship, attends to the dilemmas in sharing participants’ perspectives in research studies. The third theme, improving practice, illustrates how the collection of teacher candidate data contributes to pedagogy during and after the course. The final theme, protecting teacher candidates in class, addresses the potential risks to participants who reveal their perspectives during the course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baier, A. C. (1994). Trust and anti-trust. In Moral prejudices (pp. 231–260). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barro, J. (2017, July 17). Liberals can win again if they stop being so annoying and fix their ‘hamburger problem’. Business Insider.Google Scholar
  3. Bullough, R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Coia, L. (2016). Trust in diversity: An autobiographic self-study. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Enacting self-study as methodology for professional inquiry (pp. 311–316). Herstmonsceux, UK: Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices SIG.Google Scholar
  6. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (3 rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
  9. Fletcher, T., Ni Chroinin, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2016). Multiple layers of interactivity in self-study of practice research: An empirically based exploration of methodological issues. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Enacting self-study as a methodology for professional inquiry (pp. 1–25). Herstmonsceux, UK: Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices SIG.Google Scholar
  10. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Kitchen, J. (2005a). Conveying respect and empathy: Becoming a relational teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kitchen, J. (2005b). Looking backwards, moving forward: Understanding my narrative as a teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 1(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitchen, J. (2016). Looking back at fifteen years of relational teacher education: A narrative self-study. In M. Hayler & J. Williams (Eds.), Transitions and transformations: Teacher educators’ journeys of becoming (pp. 167–182). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Kitchen, J. (2018, April). Attending to the concerns of teacher candidates in a social justice course: A self-study of a teacher educator. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Kitchen, J., & Bellini, C. (2012). Making it better for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students through teacher education: A collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 8(3), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2002, Summer). The contribution of faculty to community building in a teacher education program: A student perspective. Teacher Education Quarterly. Google Scholar
  18. Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2008). We taught them about literacy but what did they learn? The impact of a preservice teacher education program on the practice of beginning teachers. Studying Teacher Education, 4(2), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kristof, N. (2016, May 7). A confession of liberal intolerance. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  20. LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, A. (2011). Self-study of cross-cultural supervision of teacher candidates for social justice. Studying Teacher Education, 7(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Loughran, J. (2007). Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education. In T. Russell & J. Loughran (Eds.), Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education: Values, relationships, and practices (pp. 1–5). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Luaer, P. (2006). An education research primer: How to understand, evaluate, and use it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. McIntosh, P. (1990). Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Independent School, 49(2), 31–36.Google Scholar
  26. Menna, J., & Russell, T. (2017). Collaboration, multiple methods, trustworthiness: Issues arising from the 2014 international conference on self-study of teacher education practices. Studying Teacher Education, 13(1), 105–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2017.1287694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mishler, E. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Education/Review, 60, 415–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell, I. (2004). Identifying ethical issues in self-study proposals. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1393–1442). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nieto, S. (1990). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Patka, M., Wallin-Ruuschman, J., Wallace, T., & Robbins, C. (2016). Exit cards: Creating a dialogue for continuous evaluation. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 659–668.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1167033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ragoonaden, K., & Bullock, S. M. (2016). Critical friends: The practical wisdom of professional development. In K. Ragoonaden & S. M. Bullock (Eds.), Mindfulness and critical friendship: A new perspective on professional development for educators (pp. 13–32). Lanham, MY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  32. Russell, T. (2004). Tracking the development of self-study in teacher education research and practice. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1191–1210). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Schuck, S., & Russell, T. J. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schuck, S., & Segal, G. (2002). Learning about our teaching from our graduates, learning about learning with critical friends. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 88–101). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  36. Solomon, P., Portelli, J., Daniel, B., & Campbell, A. (2005). The discourse of denial: How white teachers construct race, racism, and “white privilege”. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(2), 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tom, A. (1997). Redesigning teacher education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options