Self-Study as a Pathway to Integrate Research Ethics and Ethics in Practice
- 217 Downloads
While sound ethical standards are important in all research, ethical issues and challenges differ between disciplines and fields of study. Self-study in teacher education often includes specific ethical issues that are rooted in the very nature of self-study. The purpose of this chapter is to define the ethical framework we adhere to as we – three teacher educators at the University of Iceland, School of Education –conduct a self-study of our educational practice. The aim of the research is to identify the ethical dimensions influencing our research and practice. The data emerge from collaborative self-study we have conducted for the last 5 years on our collaborative group supervision of Master's projects and include research journals, notes from meetings, and feedback from and communication with students. We focus on incidents we have identified as deserving ethical consideration.
We thank the University of Iceland Research Fund for supporting this research and the University of Iceland Teaching fund for supporting the development of the supervisory learning community.
- Brandenburg, R., & Gervasoni, A. (2010). Engaging with ethical practice: A study of ethical issues arising from self-study research. In L. B. Erickson, J. R. Young, & S. Pinnegar (Eds.), Conference proceedings at the eight international conference on self-study of teacher education practices: Navigating the public and private: Negotiating the diverse landscapes of teacher education (pp. 33–36). Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
- Carr, D. (2000). Professionalism and ethics in teaching. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Gísladóttir, K. R., & Guðjónsdóttir, H. (2015). Confronting the hearing teacher in deaf education: Critical friends in self-study. In K. Pithouse-Morgan & A. P. Samaras (Eds.), Polyvocal professional learning through self-study research (pp. 57–74). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guðjónsdóttir, H., Jónsdóttir, S. R., & Gísladóttir, K. R. (2017). Collaborative supervision: Using core reflection to understand our supervision of Master’s projects. In R. Brandenburg, K. Glasswell, M. Jones, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Reflective theory and practice in teacher education (pp. 237–255). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jónsdóttir, S. J., Guðjónsdóttir, H., & Gísladóttir, K. R. (2018). Að vinna meistaraprófsverkefni í námssamfélagi nemenda og leiðbeinenda. Tímarit um uppeldi og menntun/Icelandic Journal of Education, 27(2), 201–223.Google Scholar
- Korthagen, F. A. J. (2013). The core reflection approach. In F. A. J. Korthagen, Y. M. Kim, & W. L. Greene (Eds.), Teaching and learning from within: A core reflection approach to quality and inspiration in education (pp. 24–41). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kristinsson, S. (2013). Að verðskulda traust: Um siðferðilegan grunn fagmennsku og starf kennara. In R. Sigþórsson, R. Eggertsdóttir, & G. H. Frímannson (Eds.), Fagmennska í skólastarfi: Skrifað til heiðurs Trausta Þorsteinssyni (pp. 237–256). Reykjavík, Iceland: Háskólaútgáfan.Google Scholar
- LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palmer, P. J. (1997). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2010). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Þorsteinsson, T. (2003). Fagmennska kennara. In B. Hansen, Ó. H. Jóhannsson, & S. H. Lárusdóttir (Eds.), Fagmennska og forysta: Þættir í skólastjórnun (pp. 187–200). Reykjavík, Iceland: Rannsóknarstofnun Kennaraháskóla Íslands.Google Scholar