Advertisement

Possibilities of Feminist Technoscience Studies of Sport: Beyond Cyborg Bodies

  • Kathryn HenneEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Feminist studies of sport offer a rich, interdisciplinary literature on the gendered dimensions of physical culture. This literature illuminates distinct aspects of women’s sporting experiences as well as how gendered, sexed, and intersectional difference informs practices, cultures, and representations of sport and physical activity. Feminist analyses of the entanglements of science, technology, and sport, while increasing in number, are comparatively limited in scope. This chapter surveys approaches used to study technosocial relations, particularly feminist technoscience, considering their current and potential contributions to studies of sport. First, it reflects on how scholars have used and adapted Haraway’s notion of the cyborg in analyses of sport. It then examines how scholars have employed agential realism and assemblage, considering their potential for feminist studies of sport. The chapter concludes by summarizing the possibilities of feminist technoscience studies of sport, while also considering how the study of embodiment, sport, and physical activity offers important reminders for scholarship on science, technology, and society.

References

  1. Adams, M. L., Helstein, M. T., Kim, K., McDonald, M. G., Davidson, J., Jamieson, K. M., et al. (2016). Feminist cultural studies: Uncertainties and possibilities. Sociology of Sport, 33(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2008). Imaginary prohibitions: Some preliminary remarks on the founding gestures of the new materialism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (Eds.). (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, D. L. (1993). Desperately seeking Michel: Foucault’s genealogy, the body, and critical sport sociology. Sociology of Sport Journal, 10(2), 148–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Åsberg, C., & Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist technoscience studies. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 17(4), 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bal, M. (2002). Traveling concepts in the humanities: A rough guide. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Birrell, S. (1988). Discourses on the gender/sport relationship: From women in sport to gender relations. Exercise and Sport Reviews, 16(1), 459–502.Google Scholar
  10. Boyle, P., & Haggerty, K. D. (2009). Spectacular security: Mega-events and the security complex. International Political Sociology, 3(3), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brownell, S. (1995). Training the body for China: Sports in the moral order of the people’s republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Butryn, T. M., & Masucci, M. A. (2003). It’s not about the book: A cyborg counternarrative of Lance Armstrong. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 27(2), 124–144.Google Scholar
  13. Butryn, T. M., & Masucci, M. A. (2009). Traversing the matrix: Cyborg athletes, technology and the environment. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 33(3), 258–307.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, C. L. (1993). Resisting the canon: Feminist cultural studies, sport and technologies of the body. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 17(2), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colls, R. (2007). Materializing bodily matter: Intra-action and the embodiment of ‘fat’. Geoforum, 38(2), 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crawford, K., Lingel, J., & Karppi, T. (2015). Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davidson, J. (2013). Sporting homonationalisms: Sexual exceptionalism, queer privilege and the 21st century international lesbian and gay sport movement. Sociology of Sport Journal, 30(1), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Esmonde, K., & Jette, S. (2018). Fatness, fitness, and feminism in the built environment: Bringing together physical cultural studies and sociomaterialisms, to study the ‘obesogenic environment’. Sociology of Sport Journal, 35(1), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foster, L. A. (2016). The making and unmaking of patent ownership: Technicalities, materialities and subjectivities. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 39(1), 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1990). History of sexuality, vol. 1, an introduction. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  21. Fouché, R. (2012). Aren’t athletes cyborgs?: Technology, bodies and sporting competitions. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 40(1&2), 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fullagar, S. (2017). Post-qualitative inquiry and the new materialist turn: Implications for sport, health and physical culture research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(2), 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hargreaves, J. (1994). Sporting females: Critical issues in the history and sociology of women’s sport. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Henne, K. (2015). Testing for athlete citizenship: Regulating doping and sex in sport. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Howe, P. D. (2011). Cyborg and supercrip: The Paralympics technology and the (dis)empowerment of disabled athletes. Sociology, 45(5), 868–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kerr, R. (2016). Sport and technology: An actor-network theory perspective. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, S. (2009). Virtually normal: Mark Bingham, the War on Terror, and the sexual politics of sport. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 33(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King, S., & Weedon, G. (2016, November 4). Protein ecologies: Building surplus muscle, regenerating excess whey. Presentation delivered at the annual meeting of the North American Society for the Sociology of Sport, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  33. Liao, J., & Markula, P. (2016). ‘The only thing I am guilty of is taking too many jump shots’: A Deleuzian media analysis of Diana Taurasi’s drug charge in 2010. Sociology of Sport Journal, 33(2), 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lowry, D. W. (2004). Understanding reproductive technologies as surveillant assemblage: Revisions of power and technoscience. Sociological Perspectives, 47(4), 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lupton, D. (2016). Digital companion species and eating data: Implications for theorizing digital data–human assemblages. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Magdalinski, T. (2008). Sport, technology, and the body: The nature of performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Markula, P. (2003). The technologies of the self: Sport, feminism, and Foucault. Sociology of Sport Journal, 20(2), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Markula, P. (2018). What is new about new materialism for sport sociology? Reflections on body, movement, and culture. Sociology of Sport Journal, online first.  https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2018-0064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maurstad, A., Davis, D., & Cowles, S. (2013). Co-being and intra-action in horse–human relationships: A multi-species ethnography of be(com)ing human and be(com)ing horse. Social Anthropology, 21(3), 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCullough, S. R. (2010). Body like a rocket: Performing technologies of naturalization. Thirdspace: A Journal of Feminist Thought and Culture, 9(2). Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/thirdspace/index.php/journal/article/viewArticle/mccullough.
  41. McDonald, M. G., & Sterling, J. (forthcoming). Feminist new materalisms and the troubling waters of the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympic and Paralympic Games. In J. Newman, H. Thorpe, & D. Andrews (Eds.), Sport, physical culture and the moving body: Materialisms, technologies, ecologies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  42. Messner, M. A. (2007). Out of play: Critical essays on gender and sport. Albany: State University Press of New York.Google Scholar
  43. Miah, A. (2003). Be afraid, very afraid: Cyborg athletes, transhuman ideals, and posthumanity. Journal of Evolution & Technology, 13. Retrieved from https://www.jetpress.org/volume13/miah.html.
  44. Moser, I. (2006). Sociotechnical practices and difference: On the interferences between disability, gender, and class. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(5), 537–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Norman, M. E., & Moola, F. (2011). ‘Bladerunner or boundary runner’?: Oscar Pistorius, cyborg transgressions and strategies of containment. Sport in Society, 14(9), 1265–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nyberg, D. (2009). Computers, customer service operatives and cyborgs: Intra-actions in call centers. Organization Studies, 30(11), 1181–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ong, A., & Collier, S. J. (Eds.). (2005). Global assemblages: Technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. Patton, P. (1994). Metamorpho-logic: Bodies and powers in A Thousand Plateaus. Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology, 25(2), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pink, S., Sumartorjo, S., Lupton, D., & La Bond, C. H. (2017). Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prasad, A. (2017). Biopolitical excess: Techno-social assemblages of stem cell research in India. Science, Technology and Society, 22(1), 102–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prins, B. (1995). The ethics of hybrid subjects: Feminist constructivism according to Donna Haraway. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 20(1), 352–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Puar, J. K. (2012). ‘I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess’: Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory. Philosophia, 2(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  54. Puar, J. K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity, disability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rail, G., & Lefebvre, M. R. (2003). Sculling cyborg: Scientific discourses, media representations and the effacement of Silken Laumann’s subversive potential. Recherche sémiotique—Semiotic Inquiry, XXII(1–2), 3–18.Google Scholar
  56. Sefiha, O., & Reichman, N. (2016). When every test is a winner: Clean cycling, surveillance, and the new preemptive governance. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 40(3), 197–217.Google Scholar
  57. Sluggett, B. (2011). Sport’s doping game: Surveillance in the biotech age. Sociology of Sport Journal, 28(4), 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Subramaniam, B. (2009). Moored metamorphoses: A retrospective essay on feminist science studies. Signs, 34(4), 951–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Swartz, L., & Watermeyer, B. (2008). Cyborg anxiety: Oscar Pistorius and the boundaries of what it means to be human. Disability & Society, 23(2), 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sykes, H. (2016). Gay pride on stolen land: Homonationalism and settler colonialism at the Vancouver Winter Olympics. Sociology of Sport Journal, 33(1), 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thorpe, H. (2016). Athletic women’s experiences of amenorrhea: Biomedical technologies, somatic ethics and embodied subjectivities. Sociology of Sport Journal, 33(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Travers, A., & Shearman, N. (2017). The Sochi Olympics, celebration capitalism and homonationalist pride. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 41(1), 42–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whelan, C. (2014). Surveillance, security and sporting mega-events: Toward a research agenda on the organization of security networks. Surveillance & Society, 11(4), 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson, M. W. (2009). Cyborg geographies: Towards hybrid epistemologies. Gender, Place and Culture, 16(5), 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations