Screening Saviors?: The Politics of Care, College Sports, and Screening Athletes for Sickle Cell Trait

  • Mary G. McDonaldEmail author


Since 2013 the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has required that all athletes be tested for sickle cell trait presumably to ensure the care, health, and safety of student-athletes given that the inherited condition can interfere with blood flow and oxygen uptake under extreme conditions such as during intense exercise. Grounded in feminist Science and Technology Studies (STS) sensibilities particularly the need to unsettle dominant notions of care, this chapter investigates the governing power of NCAA screening discourses and practices through an exploration of three related issues: (1) the ways in which the screening procedures at times rely upon, remake, and subvert historical commonsense classification systems related to race; (2) the broader commodified contexts of college sport and sickle cell trait screening which veil the racialized political economic structure of the NCAA, a structure which is built upon the unpaid labor of college athletes; and (3) the biopolitics of screening practices both within and beyond the NCAA. By investigating these issues, this analysis also interrogates the precarious use of health screening within sport spaces and beyond while helping to trouble notions of (dis)ability, health, and risk.


  1. Abkowitz, J. L. (2013). Presidents column—Sickle cell trait and sports: Is the NCAA a hematologist? The Hematologist: ASH News and Reports, 10(3), 1.Google Scholar
  2. Abkowitz, J. L., Connor, F. G., Deuster, P. A., & Thompson, A. A. (2014). Sickle cell trait and safe athletic participation: The way forward. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 13(3), 192–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abu El-Haj, N. (2007). The genetic reinscription of race. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almsay, S. (2018, September 22). Maryland football player who died from heat stroke needed cold immersion therapy. CNN. Retrieved from
  5. Bediako, S., & Moffitt, K. (2011). Race and social attitudes about sickle cell disease. Ethnicity & Health, 16(4–5), 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonham, V. L., Dover, G. J., & Brody, L. C. (2010). Screening student athletes for sickle cell trait—A social and clinical experiment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 997–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caron, B., & Dyson, S. M. (2015). Actor network theory, agency and racism: The case of sickle cell trait and US athletics. Social Theory and Health, 13(1), 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davison, C. (1996). Predictive genetics: The cultural implications of supplying probable futures. In T. Marteau & M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (pp. 317–330). Cambridge: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duster, T. (2003). Backdoor to eugenics (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Ehrlich, S. C. (2018). Gratuitous promises: Overseeing athletic organizations and the duty to care. Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal, XXV(1), 1–49.Google Scholar
  11. Ferrari, R., Parker, L. S., Grubs, R. E., & Krishnamurti, L. (2015). Sickle cell screening of collegiate athletes: Ethical reasons for program reform. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24(6), 873–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fullwiley, D. (2007). The molecularization of race: Institutionalizing human difference in pharmacogenetics practice. Science as Culture, 16(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerlach, N., Hamilton, S., Sullivan, R., & Walton, P. (2011). Becoming biosubjects: Bodies. Systems. Technologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gilman, S. (Ed.). (2008). Race in contemporary medicine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Giknis, F. (2016, April 18). Is physical activity as punishment acceptable in college athletics? College AD.Google Scholar
  16. Harris, O. (2000). African American predominance in sport. In D. Brooks & R. Althouse (Eds.), Racism in college sport: The African American athlete’s experience. Morgantown: Fitness Information Technologies.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkins, B. (2013). The new plantation: Black athletes, college sport and predominately white NCAA institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendrickson, B. (2011, October 1). The monster within. NCAA Champion Magazine.Google Scholar
  19. Lawrence, R. H. (2010). Athlete and coach knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of sickle cell trait and National Collegiate Athletic Association Testing: Recommendations for intervention. Dissertation.Google Scholar
  20. Lawrence, R. H., Scott, A., Haywood, C., Robinson, K., & Mason, M. (2015). Social and behavioral implications of National Collegiate Athletic Association sickle cell trait screening: The athletes’ perspective. Journal of Georgia Public Health Association, 15(2), 177–183.Google Scholar
  21. National College Players Association. (n.d.). Mission and Goals. National College Players Association. Retrieved from
  22. Murphy, M. (2015). Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 665–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelkin, D., & Tancredi, L. (1994). Dangerous diagnostics. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  24. Nelson, A. (2011). Body and soul: The Black Panther Party and the fight against medical discrimination. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nocera, J., & Strauss, B. (2018). Indentured: The battle to end the exploitation of college athletes. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Platt, A. (2018, January). Stopping the sickle cycle-Where are we? American Sickle Cell Anemia Association. Retrieved from
  28. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pollock, A. (2012). Medicalizing race: Heart disease and durable preoccupations with difference. Durham: Duke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roberts, D. (2011). Fatal invention: How science, politics and big business re-create race in the twenty-first century. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  31. Safai, P. (2013). Sports medicine, health and the politics of risk. In D. L. Andrews & B. Carrington (Eds.), A companion to sport (pp. 112–128). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sage, G. (1990). Power and ideology in American sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  33. Sickle Cell Disease. (n.d.). American Society of Hematology. Retrieved from
  34. Sickle Cell Trait. (n.d.). American Society of Hematology. Retrieved from
  35. Sickle Cell Trait: A Factsheet for Athletes. (n.d.). NCAA. Retrieved from
  36. Sickle Cell Trait: A Factsheet for Coaches. NCAA. Retrieved from
  37. Sport Science Institute. (n.d.). Health and safety. NCAA. Retrieved from
  38. Thompson, A. (2012). Division (I): ASH opposes NCAA requirement for screening. The Hematologist: ASH News and Reports, 9(2). Retrieved from
  39. Veklerov, K. (2016, January 29). UC admits liability in 2014 death of Cal football player. San Francisco Chronicle.Google Scholar
  40. Wailoo, K. (2001). Dying in the city of the blues. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  41. Ward, P. (2013). Lawsuit targets Slippery Rock. Pittsburgh Post Gazette. Retrieved from
  42. Zards, B. (2010, July 20). Lawsuit prompts NCAA to screen athletes for sickle cell. USA Today. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations