Skip to main content

Higher Education in India: Refocusing Faculty Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Higher education systems across the globe are experiencing unprecedented expansion. This has resulted in increased initiatives for improving quality of higher education. As teaching-learning constitutes the core activity in educational institutions, initiatives for improving quality of teaching have spread. Further, increasing demands and needs of twenty-first century students are also driving the institutions to relook their policies and practices for imparting quality teaching. Therefore, to improve teaching, faculty development initiatives has gained impetus. Across the globe, higher education institutions are developing and introducing programmes for faculty development aimed to ensure quality of faculty and its effectiveness. In Indian context too, challenges for improving quality of higher education led to adoption of programmes for faculty development during the last few decades. This chapter looks into the faculty development initiatives in the Indian higher education system and suggests for reviewing and refocusing the design and approach of faculty development programmes in view of the present needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, P. (1988). Faculty development in higher education – A literature review. In Faculty publications – School of education (Paper 65). Available at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/soe_faculty/65. Accessed 3 May 2017.

  • Bay, E., Bagceci, B., & Cetin, B. (2012). The effects of social constructivist approach on the learners’ problem solving and metacognitive levels. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, C. J., Schmitz, C., Stritter, F., Henry, R., & Aluise, J. (1990). Successful faculty in academic medicine: Essential skills and how to acquire them. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. V. (1991). Activities as instructional tools: A framework for analysis and evaluation. Educational Research, 20, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X020004009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne, J., & Stuart, R. (1977). Implicit learning theories as determinants of the effect of management development programmes. Personnel Review, 6(2), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1976). Faculty development practices in U.S. colleges and universities (p. 96). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, J., & Wiles, J. A. (2010). Revisiting professional development: Recoiling the needs and responsibilities of faculty, researchers, and administrators with the new realities in higher education. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 16, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. (1996). Professional development as perspective transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college course. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. B. (2016). How do we get there from here? The Journal of Higher Education, 46(6), 719–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI. (2018) Status of National Mission on teachers training, PIB, http://www.pib.nic.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1539279.

  • Government of India. (1984). Report of the national commission on teachers II, New Delhi. New Delhi: MHRD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (1986). National Policy on Education (NPE). New Delhi: Department of Education, MHRD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (1997). Report of the committee to review the pay scales of university and college teachers in 1997. New Delhi: The Rastogi Committee’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • High Level Group on the Modernisation of Higher Education. (2013). Report to the European Commission on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s Higher education institutions. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • India. (1985). Report of National Commission on teachers-II, 1983–85. The Commission: Controller of Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, W. J., Xiong, W., & Ye, H. (2015). Establishing a standard for academic excellence: Professional development programmes at world-class universities. Palgrave Communications, 1, 15002. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2015.2. www.palgrave-journals.com/palcomms.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From andragogy to pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, D. S. (1966). Report of the education commission 1964–66. New Delhi: Government of India, MHRD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, P. A., & King, K. P. (2000). Refocusing faculty development: The view from an adult learning perspective. Adult education research conference. http://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2000/papers/48

  • Makeachie, W. J. (1991). What theories underlie the practice of faculty development? Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Accessed from: digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1218&context=podimproveacad

  • William McKee, C., Johnson, M., Ritchie, W. F., Mark Tew, W., Austin, A. E., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2013). The future of faculty development: Where are we going? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013(133), 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment and Accreditation Council. (2012). Review of academic staff colleges. Bangalore: NAAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, W. (1983). Faculty who stay: Renewing our most important resource. In R. Baldwin & R. Blackburn (Eds.), College faculty: Versatile human resources in a period of constraint. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odiorne, G. S. (1984). Strategic Management of Human Resources. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, S. (2018). In N. V. Varghese, A. Pachauri, & S. Mandal (Eds.), Professional development of teachers in higher education, in India higher education report 2017: Teaching, learning and quality in higher education. CPRHE, NIEPA: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preus, P. K., & Williams, D. F. (1979). Personalized faculty development: Rationale, applications, and evaluation. Bear Creek: CESCO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishna, S. (1948). University Education Commission, 1948–49 (Radhakrishna Commission) Report is on UGC website.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegle, P. R. (1987). Conceptions of faculty development. Educational Theory, 37(1), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. A. (2003). 50 years of University Grants Commission. New Delhi: UGC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets, K. J., & Schwenk, T. L. (1990). Faculty development for family medicine educators: An agenda for future activities. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2(3), 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M. A. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 92–113). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinert, Y. (2000). Faculty development in the new millennium: Key challenges and future directions. Medical Teacher, 22(1), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toombs, W. (1983). Faculty development: The institutional side. New Directions for Institutional Research, 40, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Commission (UGC), Annual Report 2016-17, UGC New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, N. V., Pachauri, A., & Mandal, S. (2017). Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya National Mission on teachers and teaching (PMMMNMTT) scheme: An evaluation. New Delhi: CPRHE/NIEPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In A. Kozulin & R. Trans (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of Higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Snehi, N. (2019). Higher Education in India: Refocusing Faculty Development. In: Bhushan, S. (eds) The Future of Higher Education in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9061-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9061-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9060-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9061-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics