Abstract
Unlike western countries, there has been very limited research related to mode choice for school children in India. The sharp decline in the use of non-motorized transport (NMT) in developed countries has been the motivation behind such studies. The hypothesis of the same trend in India cities was tested in this study. The results were quite alarming as it showed a fall of 46% in NMT use for the school trip. The paper explores mode choice literature on for school-going children and also the studies relating NMT use with the health. Investigation of mode choice for school children in India was carried out based on two major perspectives namely socio-economic attributes of the parents and built environment. Survey of 526 parents was carried out from different primary schools in the study area and a multinomial logit (MNL) model was developed. The factors like vehicular ownership, school distance, education level of parents, type of school, and standard of child proved significant for the mode choice of children in this model. The analysis for the effect of built environment factors and its effect on NMT use was separately conducted. The results of this analysis showed that 54% parents did not feel safe to send their children to school by walk or cycle and the primary reasons stated were “long distance to school” and “crime and safety”. Since long distance proved to be a major factor for creating a disutility for NMT mode, a binary logit analysis was done to find the probability of NMT use. The result shows that the breakeven distance is 2.3 km, at which the probability of usage of motorized vehicle and non-motorized vehicle becomes the same. The paper concludes with the recommendations based on the result of the study and future prospects of work that can be done.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
McDonald NC (2008) Household interactions and children’s school travel: the effect of parental work patterns on walking and biking to school. J Transp Geogr 16(5):324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.01.002
McMillan TE (2007) The relative influence of urban form on a child’s travel mode to school. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 41(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.011
Pucher J, Dijkstra L (2003) Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health walking and cycling: the MOST sustainable transport modes. Am J Public Health 93(9):1509–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028
Lee C, Zhu X, Yoon J, Varni JW (2013) Beyond distance: children’s school travel mode choice. Ann Behav Med 45(suppl_1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9432-z
Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med 25(2):80–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
McMillan TE (2005) Urban form and a child’s trip to school: the current literature and a framework for future research. J Plan Lit 19(4):440–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412204274173
Black C, Collins A, Snell M (2001) Encouraging walking: the case of journey-to school trips in compact urban areas. Urban Stud 38(7):1121–1141
Seraj S, Sidharthan R, Bhat C, Pendyala R, Goulias K (2012) Parental attitudes toward children walking and bicycling to school: multivariate ordered response analysis. Transp Res Rec 2323:46–55
Mackett RL (2013) Children’s travel behaviour and its health implications. Transp Policy 26:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.002
Wen LM, Fry D, Rissel C, Dirkis H, Balafas A, Merom D (2008) Factors associated with children being driven to school: implications for walk to school programs. Health Educ Res 23(2):325–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym043
Shokoohi R, Hanif NR, Dali M (2012) Influence of the socio-economic factors on children’s school travel. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 50(July):135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.022
McDonald N (2005) Getting to school: the impact of free transit on low income and minority students. In: Annual meeting of the transportation research board
Department of Health, Physical Activity, Health Improvement and Protection (2004) At least five a week—evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health. Nutr Bull 29:350–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-3010.2004.00455.x
Gujarati DN (2004) Basic econometric. New York. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186874
Mcfadden D (1980) Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. J Bus 53(3):S13–S29
Ewing R, Schroeer W, Greene W (2004) School location and student travel: analysis of factors affecting mode choice. Transp Res Rec 1895(1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.3141/1895-08
Safe Route to School (n.d.) Retrieved 12 May 2017, from http://www.saferoutesinfo.org/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kavta, K., Adhvaryu, B. (2020). Walking and Bicycling to School—Understanding the Impact of Socio-economic Factors and Built Environment. In: Mathew, T., Joshi, G., Velaga, N., Arkatkar, S. (eds) Transportation Research . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 45. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9042-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9042-6_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9041-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9042-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)