Abstract
The paper makes a critical study of colonial writings on history of Northeast India; identifies inherent bias and prejudices, questions their reliability and validity at the backdrop of political and epistemological crisis that had gone into the creation and argues in favour of interdisciplinary approaches in the process of reconstructing the past history of the Northeast societies; which are predominantly pre-literate and do not have any written tradition. The paper examines the role of colonial ethnographical accounts; discounts projection of tribes as cultural isolates and suggests reconstructing the history in terms of shared past and shared culture; economic dependence; and precisely in the framework of interaction. The paper advocates for historical analysis of the socio-economic life; political and cultural developments on the basis of social science principles and universalism based upon the parameters of causes and effects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The present paper heavily draws on the data and argument presented in Thakur (2007).
- 2.
A National Seminar on ‘The Archaeology of North East India’ was held from 26 to 28 October 1988, in the Department of History, NEHU. The first seminar of its kind, it attempted to ‘take stock of existing knowledge to identify further areas of research and inquiry. It brought together geographers, geologists, ecologists, linguists, historians, anthropologists and archaeologists to explore various facets of the problem. In the process an authoritative corpus of writing was made available in the collection of papers and abstracts, which with additions and editorial work was published 3 years later’ (Singh and Sengupta 1991).
Surprising enough, Arunachal Pradesh and some other regions have not been properly represented. The aspects of ethnoarchaeology and industrial archaeology to mention a few are problematic sides to be found in Thakur (2004) that has attempted at filling this gap.
- 3.
- 4.
1857 marks the year of the occurrence of the first major revolt against the rule of the English in India. The British Company officials, however, had managed to counter and ultimately arrest the revolt.
- 5.
Pantham’s account is indeed crucial as it provides the theoretical framework through which the present paper has sought to establish a linkage between imperialist expansion and systems of knowledge formation established to consolidate colonial rule.
- 6.
Dirks makes this statement in the context of change in colonial systems of knowledge generation.
- 7.
Without commenting on the accuracy (or the lack of it) of data and its analysis presented in these ethnographic accounts here, I must give the names of some of the major studies. These, among others, include Alexander Mackenzie’s History of the Relations of the Government with the Hill Tribes of the North-East Frontier of Bengal (1884), T. C. Hudson’s The Meitheis (1908), J.H. Hutton’s The Angami Nagas (1921a) and The Sema Nagas (1921b) and L.W. Shakespeare’s History of the Assam Rifles (1929).
It is important to make a related point here. The specific and significant changes brought by the colonial rule in northeast India warrant a special kind of periodization. It seems to me that the periodization of the hill societies of northeast India including Arunachal Pradesh should be on the terms of the pre-colonial, colonial and post-independence rather than the more conventional (and inappropriate in this context) ancient, medieval and modern. For details, see Thakur (2014).
- 8.
I draw this rather obvious insight about the way in which ill-informed ethnographic studies can be academically reductive from Frank McGlynn (1994).
- 9.
- 10.
The Annales School is a group of historians who follow the style of histography developed by French historians in the twentieth century to stress the use of social scientific methods in the study of history.
References
Aitchison, C.U. 1892. A Collection of Treatise, Engagements and Sanads Relating to India and Neighbouring Countries (Compiled) Vol – I. Calcutta: Government of India central Publication Branch.
Barpujari, H.K. 1970. Problem of the Hill Tribes: North-East Frontier, 1822–42. Guwahati: Lawyer’s Book Stall.
———. 1978. Problem of the Hill Tribes: North-East Frontier, 1843–72. Guwahati: United Publications.
Beresford, W.G. 1881. Notes on the North-Eastern Frontier of Assam. Shillong.
Bhuyan Suryya Kumar. 1949. Early British Relations with Assam. Shillong: The Department of Historical and Antiquarian Studies in Assam.
Bora, M.S., and M. Sharma. 2000. Historiography in North East India: Assessing Surya Kumar Bhuyan. Shillong: North East India History Association.
Bruce, C.A. 1839. Report on the manufacture of tea, and on the extent and produce of the tea plantations in Assam. Calcutta: Bishop’s College Press.
Buchanan-Hamilton, Francis. 1820. 1963 (reprint). An Account of Assam. Guwahati: Department of Historical and Antiquarian Studies. London: D.H.A.S.) First Published in.
Butler, John. 1847. A Sketch of Assam with Some Account of the Hill Tribes, by an Officer. London: Smith Elder & Co.
———. 1855. Travels and Adventures in the Province of Assam during a Residence of Fourteen Years. London: Smith Elder & Co.
Chakravorty, Birendra Chandka. 1964. British Relations with the Hill Tribes of Assam since 1858. Calcutta: Firma K. L. Mukhopadhyay.
Cooper, T.T. 1873/1995 The Mishmi Hills. Indian reprint, 1995, Delhi: Mittal Publications.
Dalton, J. T. E. 1845. On the Miris and Abors of Assam. J. A. S. B. quoted in Bhuyan, 1949.
Dalton, E.T. 1872. Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal. Calcutta: Superintendent, Government Printing Press.
Darnton, Robert. 1984. The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History. New York: Basic Books.
Das, K.K. 1991. Studies in the Economic History of Pre-Colonial North East India: A Survey of the Papers Published in the NEIHA Proceedings. In Proceedings of North East India History Association, 85–89. Jagiroad: NEIHA, 12th session.
Davis, Natalie Zemon. 1975. Society and Culture in Early Modern France. Stanford: California University Press.
Dirks, Nicholas B. 2001. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dunbar, G.D. S.(1913–1917). ‘Abors and Galongs’. Memoirs of Asiatic Society of Bengal V, pp. 10–15.
Dutta, S. 1996. The NEIHA and Its Contributions to the Study of Arunachal Pradesh (Upto 1994). Proceedings of North East India History Association XVII: 333–338.
———. 2002. Sources of History of Arunachal Pradesh: A Critical Survey. Paper presented to ICHR Seminar, Guwahati.
———. 2013. History and Historiography of Arunachal Pradesh. New Delhi: Akansha.
Elliot, J.1789. ‘Observation on the Inhabitants of Garrov Hills Made During a Public Deputation in the Years 1788 and 1789’. Asiatic Researches, III, Calcutta.
Endle, S. 1911. The Kacharis. London: Macmillan & Co.
Furer-Haimendorf Christoph von. 1939a. The Naked Nagas. London: Methuen and Co.
———. 1939b. Himalayan Barbary. London: John Murray.
Gadgil, M., and Ramachandra Guha. 1992. This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Gait, Edward A. 1905. A History of Assam. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink & Company.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
———. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Goswami, S. 1993. Progress of Historical Research in North East India: A Survey. In Proceedings of North East India History Association, vol. XIV, 355–366.
Grange, E.R. 1839. Narrative of an Expedition into the Naga Territories of Assam. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 8, 1839. 7. FPC 24 April, 1 839 No 1 5. 1 9 June 1 839; No 40 8.
Gurdon, P.R.T. 1914a Notes on the Khasis, Syntengs, and Allied Tribes Inhabiting the Khasi and Jaintia Hills District in Assam’. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal (JASB),73, Part 3, No. IV, pp. 57–74.
——— 1914b. The Khasis. London: Macmillan & Co., 2.
Hamilton, Angus 1912/2003. In Abor Jungles of North-East India. New Delhi: Mittal Publications, 2003. First Published under the title of In Abor Jungles –Being an Account of the Abor Expedition, The Mishmi Mission and The Miri Mission in 1912, London: Eveleigh Nash.
Hannay, S.F. 1848.'Notes on the Ancient Temples and Other Remains in the Vicinity of Suddyah, Upper Assam'. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 17, Calcutta.
———. 1851. Brief Notice of the Sil Haok or Stone Bridge in Zillah Kamrup. JSAB 20. Calcutta.
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger, eds. 1992. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, T.C. 1908. The Meitheis. London: D.Nutt.
———. 1911. The Naga Tribes of Manipur. Vol. 43, 698. London: Macmillan.
Hugon, Thomas 1837. Remarks on the Silk Worms and Silks of Assam. JASB, VI(January–December), Calcutta.
Hunter, W.W. 1879. A Statistical Account of Assam, Vol. II. London: Tubner & Co.
Hutton, J.H. 1921a. The Angami Nagas. London: Macmillan and Limited.
———. 1921b. The Sema Nagas. London: Macmillan and Limited.
John, M’Cosh. 1837/1986. (reprint). Topography of Assam, Calcutta: Government Press, Reprint, New Delhi: Lagos Press.
Ladurie, E. Le Roy 1979. Carnival in Romans. (Trans. Mary Feeney). George Braziller: New York.
Lahiri, R.M. 1994/1954. The Annexation of Assam (1824–54).Calcutta: General Printers and Publishers.
Macgregor, R. 1873. Selection of papers Regarding the Hill Tribes Between Assam and Burma and on the Upper Brahmaputra. Calcutta: Government Press.
———. 1887. Military Report on the Khampti-Singphoe Country. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing (Government Press).
Mackan, C.D. 1885. General Manual of Madras Presidency. Madras: Government Press.
Mackenzie, Alexander. 1884. History of the Relations of the Government with the Hill Tribes of the North-East Frontier of Bengal. Calcutta: Home Dept. Press.
Martin, R. 1837. The History, Antiquities, Topography and Statistics of Eastern India, Vol. Ill. London: J. Cochrane and co.
McGlynn, Frank. 1994. Ethnography. In Encyclopedia of Social History, ed. Peter N. Stearns, 319–320. New York: Garland Publishing.
Michel, J.F. 1883. Report on the North East Frontier of India. Calcutta: Government Press.
Mills, J.P. 1922a. The Rengma Nagas. London: Macmillan and, Limited.
———. 1922b. The Lotha Nagas. London: Macmillan and, Limited.
J. P. Mills’s, The Ao Nagas, 1926, London: Macmillan and Co, Limited.
Momin, M. 2003. Generalization in Constructing Histories of North East India. In Proceedings of North East India History Association, vol. XXIV, 32–42.
Nag, Sajal. 1996. Aspects of Historiography of North East India. In Proceedings of North East India History Association, vol. XVII, 66–74.
———. 2011. Contesting Exclusion, Resisting Inclusion: Contradictory Trends in Historical Research in North East India (1800-1900). In Approaches to History: Essays in Indian Historiography, ed. Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, 225–254. New Delhi: ICHR & Primus Books.
Nath, Lopita. 1999. The Orundoi: A Harbinger of Social Change in the Nineteenth Century Assam. In Proceedings of North East India History Association, vol. XX, 166–174.
Neufville, J.B. 1928. ‘On the geography and Population of Assam’. Asiatic Research, Calcutta.
Ozouf, Mona. 1988. Festivals of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pantham, Thomas. 1995. Political Theories and Social Reconstruction: A critical survey of the literature on India. New Delhi: Sage. 1995: 70–71.
Pemberton, R.B. 1835. Report on the Eastern Frontier of British India. Calcutta: Government of India, Printed at Baptist Mission Press, Circular Road.
Playfair, A. 1909. The Garos. London: David and Nutt.
Raja, K.A.A. 1975. Arunachal: The Evolution of Personality. In Arunachal News, June,1975, Shillong: NEFA Administration.
Reid, Sir Robert. 1942. History of the Frontier Areas Bordering on Assam from 1883–1941. Guwahati: Spectrum Publications.
Robinson, William. 1841/1975 (reprint). A Descriptive Account of Assam. Calcutta: Government Printing Press 1841; reprint, Delhi: Sanskaran Prakashak.
———. 1851. Notes on the Daphlas and the Peculiarities of Their Languages. JASB,.XX.
Rowlatt, E.A. 1945. Report of an Expedition into the Mishmee Hills to the North East of Sudyah. JASB XIV: 488f.
Saikia, Munin. 2014. Historiography of North East India. Guwahati: DVS.
Shakespeare, L.W. 1914. History of Upper Assam, Upper Burmah and Frontier. London: Macmillan and Ltd.
———. 1929. History of the Assam Rifles. London: Macmillan and Limited.
Sharma, Manorama. 1993. Theoretical Trends in History Writing and the Status of Historical Research in North East India. Proceedings of North East India History Association XVI: 367–387.
———. 1997. Writing of History: The Colonial Bias. Proceedings of North East India History Association, vol. XVIII: 54–60.
Sherring, M.A. 1872. Hindu Tribes and Castes. London/Bombay/Calcutta: Trubner andetc.etc.
Singh, J.P., and G. Sengupta, eds. 1991. Archaeology of North Eastern India. New Delhi: Har Anand and Vikas Publishing.
Smith, W.C. 1925. The Ao Naga Tribes of Assam: A Study in Ethnology and Sociology. London: Macmillan & Co.
Syiemlieh, David R. 1998. North East India: Trends in Historical Writings 1947–1997. In J. P. Singh (Chief ed.) 1998, Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities in North East India (1947–97), New Delhi: Regency Publications, pp. 36–46.
———. 2003. Survey of Research in History on North East India 1970–1990. New Delhi: Regency Publications.
Thakur, Amrendra K. 2003a. Process and Agency of Pre-Colonial State of Arunachal Pradesh. NEHU Journal I (1. (New Series): 1–26.
———. 2003b. Slavery in Arunachal Pradesh. New Delhi: Mittal.
———. 2004. Archaeology of Arunachal Pradesh, ICHR Project Report. New Delhi: ICHR.
———. 2005. Socio-Economic Formations in Pre-Colonial Arunachal Pradesh: Myth and Reality. The Indian Historical Review XXXII (2): 37–63.
———. 2006. Historical Studies of Arunachal Pradesh: An Overview. In North East India: Interpreting the Sources of its History, ed. Ranzu Bezbaruah, P. Goswami, and D. Banerjee, 24–36. New Delhi: ICHR and Aryan Books International.
———. 2007. Reassessing Researches into History of North East India. In Tribal Studies Emerging Frontiers of Knowledge, ed. T. Mibang and M.C. Behera, 93–120. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
———. 2009. The Institution of Slavery in the Chin Society: A Study. In Chin: History, Culture and Identity, ed. K. Robin, 217–238. New Delhi: Dominant Publishers’ and Distributors.
———. 2014. State, Society and Trade: Issues in Historiography of Northeast India. Paper presented at 35 Annual Conference of North East India History Association, Gargaon, Assam.
———., 2015. Ethnographic Accounts and the Reconstruction of Historical Past of Northeast India. Paper presented at North East India History Association, 36th Session, Aizawl.
———. 2016. Pre-Colonial Arunachal Pradesh: Society, Technology and Trade. New Delhi: Akansha. in press.
Waddel, L.A. 1975. The Tribes of the Barhmaputra Valley: A Contribution on Their Physical Types and Affinities. Delhi: Sanskaran Prakashak. (First published in 1901).
Wade, John Peter 1800/1927 (edition.). An Account of Assam. (Edited by Benudhar Sharma), Madhupur Tea Estate, Sibsagar/North Lakhimpur: R.Sharma. (It was compiled during 1793–1800).
White, Major Adam, 1832/1988 (reprint). A Memoir of the Late David Scott, D.H.A.S., Assam, Guwahati. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.
Wilcox, R. 1832. Memoir of a Survey of Assam and neighboring Countries Executed in 1825–1829. Asiatic Research XVII, AR17: 314–469.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thakur, A.K. (2020). Historical Reconstruction of the Past of Northeast India: An Assessment of Colonial Writings. In: Behera, M. (eds) Tribal Studies in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9026-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9026-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9025-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9026-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)