Abstract
Since the coining of the term “Net Neutrality” by Tim Wu way back in 2003 Net Neutrality has been one of the hotly debated regulatory issue across the world. Country regulators have taken varied positions in defining net neutrality, with some such as the Federal Communications Commission in the USA even reversing its net neutrality policies. There are still gray areas in enforcing and implementing net neutrality rules. The Indian regulator tilted more toward pure net neutrality, despite lobbying against the same by the telcos and ISPs. However, in the USA, net neutrality regulations have swayed from pure to “no” net neutrality.
When I was handling communications department…my friend Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook CEO) met me a number of times with the idea of Free Basics . I said India is a democracy, we don’t believe in one gate. We believe in multiple gates. Therefore, this gate locking for India will not be accepted and I did not allow it. This stems (from) our commitment that Internet must be accessible to all. The citizen’s right to access the internet “non-negotiable” and that the government will not allow any company to restrict people’s entry to digital space.
—Ravi Shankar Prasad, IT Minister of India.*
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Partly based on Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS) International Washington DC Centre Policy Note #8 that was first published in February 2019 included with the permission of CUTS International.
- 2.
Partly based on the article that appeared in HINDU BUSINESS LINE on July 6, 2016, with the permission of THG Publishing Private Limited.
- 3.
Source code of this project is available at: https://github.com/arashmolavi/DifferentiationDetector
- 4.
Partly based on article that appeared in HINDU BUSINESS LINE on 11 Jul 2017 with the permission of THG Publishing Private Limited.
- 5.
Partly based on Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS) International Washington DC Centre Policy Note #8 that was first published in February 2019 included with the permission of CUTS International.
References
Best, M. (2014). The Internet that Facebook built. Communications of the ACM, 57(12), 21–23.
Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC). (2017). Net neutrality regulatory assessment methodology.
Chiang, M. (2012). Networked life: 20 Questions and answers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farrell, J., & Weiser, P. J. (2003). Modularity, vertical integration, and open access policies: Towards a convergence of antitrust and regulation in the internt age. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 17, 85.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2015). FCC adopts strong, sustainable rules to protect the Internet. Available at https://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0226/DOC-332260A1.pdf. Accessed on 10 May 2017.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2017). The future of Internet freedom. Available at https://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2017/db0426/DOC-344590A1.pdf. Accessed on 10 May 2018.
Hanna, M. (2018, April). Net neutrality: A brief overview of the policy and the FCC’s ruling to upend it. IEEE Computer, 78–81.
Kakhki, M., Razaghpanah, A., Koo, H., Li, A., Golani, R., Choffnes, D., et al. (2015). Identifying traffic differentiation in mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM/USENIX Internet Measurement Conference (IMC’15).
Kramer, J., Wieworra, L., & Weinhardt, C. (2012). Net neutrality: A progress report. Telecommunications Policy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.08.005.
Prasad, R., & Sridhar, V. (2014). The dynamics of spectrum management: Legacy, technology, and economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN-13: 978-0-19-809978-9; ISBN-10: 0-19-809978-9.
Prasad, R., & Sridhar, V. (2014, April 19). The economics of net neutrality. Economics and Political Weekly, XLIX(16), 52–58.
Prasad, R., & Sridhar, V. (2015, June 27). Net neutrality to digital dynamism. Economic & Political Weekly, L(26), 19–22.
Prasad, R., & Sridhar, V. (2017, July 11). The puzzle of telecom regulation. Business Line.
Rochet, J., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.
Sridhar, V. (2017, December 5). Monitoring & enforcement of Net neutrality a huge task for regulators. Deccan Chronicle.
Sridhar, V. (2019, February). Net neutrality: Contradicting postures in the U.S. and India. CUTS International Washington DC Centre Policy Note #8.
Sridhar, V., & Prasad, R. (2016, February 11). It is time to redefine net neutrality. Hindu Business Line.
Sridhar, V., & Prasad, R. (2016, July 7). Net neutrality demand lacks Indian context. Hindu Business Line.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2015, March 27). Regulatory Framework for Over-the-top (OTT) services.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2016, February 8). Pre-consultation paper on net neutrality. Prohibition of discriminatory tariffs for data services regulation 2016.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2016, May 30). Pre-consultation paper on net neutrality.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2017, June 1). Consultation paper on “Data speed under wireless broadband plans”.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2017, November 28). Recommendations on net neutrality.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2018, February 16). The Telecommunication tariff (63rd Amendment) order.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2019, April 3). Direction under section 13, read with section 11 (2), of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 to all Access Service Providers regarding segmented offers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sridhar, V. (2019). What Are the Nuances of Net Neutrality?. In: Emerging ICT Policies and Regulations. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9022-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9022-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9021-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9022-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)