Abstract
The present chapter presents a case study of a High School Biology teacher named ‘Saira’ and aims to understand the different facets of her knowledge in the area of ‘Ethical Issues in Biological Sciences’. She takes recourse to different ethical theories, such as Virtue theory, Deontological and Utilitarian theory which though implicit are evident in her arguments and approach towards teaching–learning of ethical issues in Biology. Narrative inquiry as a method was used to probe into teacher’s understanding and conceptions related to the teaching of Bioethical issues. An attempt has been made to document the classroom discourses between the teacher and her students on different ethical issues, wherein an interpretive approach to classroom discourse analysis has been adopted. Teaching and learning about ethical issues in Biological Sciences involves ethical reasoning and ethical inquiry unlike the scientific method of investigation. The present case study opens a new window to address and view the ethical issues in Science from a subjective viewpoint and facilitate decision-making that is in consonance with the humanistic ideal of Science which is all encompassing and socially justifiable. It will further provide an insight into the categories of teachers’ knowledge that are needed for addressing the ethical issues in the classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Source: Survey Proforma (Appendix C).
- 2.
The present chapter involves the use of certain codes, e.g. KTS, OST, KNOS, etc. that refer to teacher’s knowledge domains (for detailed reference see Appendix F).
- 3.
Source: Questionnaire.
- 4.
Emotional Metaphors indicate how someone feels about events, objects or people in his/her life. Metaphorical language is said to be an extraordinarily powerful tool through which teachers express the meaning of their experiences in teaching and much of their pedagogical knowledge which teachers hold (e.g., see Briscoe, 1991; Clandinin, 1986).
References
Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75(2):185–199.
Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd ed., pp. 19–26). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Clandinin, D. J. (1986). Classroom practice: Teachers’ images in action. London: Falmer Press.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. U.S.A: Penguin Books.
Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of thinking and choices in years 10 to 16. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago.
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.
Reiss, M. (2010). Ethical thinking. In A. Jones, A. McKim, & M. Reiss (Eds.), Ethics in the science and technology classroom (pp. 1–6). Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saxena, A. (2019). Incorporating Ethics for Decision-Making—Case Narrative of a High School Teacher. In: Ethics in Science. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9009-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9009-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9008-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9009-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)