Skip to main content

Recent Advances in Compressive Sensing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematical Models, Methods and Applications

Part of the book series: Industrial and Applied Mathematics ((INAMA))

  • 1351 Accesses

Abstract

Compressive sensing is an efficient way to represent signal with less number of samples. Shannon’s theorem which states that the sampling rate must be at least twice the maximum frequency present in the signal (the so-called Nyquist rate) is a common practice and conventional approach to sampling signals or images. Compressive sensing reveals that signals can be sensed or recovered from lesser data than required by Shannon’s theorem. This paper presents a brief historical background, mathematical foundation, and a theory behind compressive sensing and its emerging applications with a special emphasis on communication, network design, signal processing, and image processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grattan-Guinness I (1990) Convolution in French mathematics, 1800–1840, vol 1. Birkhauser, Boston, p 177

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shannon C (1949) Communication in the presence of noise. Proc Inst Radio Eng 37(1):10{21}

    Google Scholar 

  3. Candès EJ (2006) Compressive sampling. Candès EJ (ed) Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians. European Mathematical Society, Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  4. Candès EJ, Wakin MB (2008) An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process Mag 25:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kotelnikov V (1933) On the carrying capacity of the ether and wire in telecommunications. In: Izd. Red. Upr. Svyazi RKKA, Moscow, Russia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nyquist H (1928) Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory. Trans AIEE 47:617{644}

    Google Scholar 

  7. Whittaker E (1915) On the functions which are represented by the expansions of the interpolation theory. Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh Sec. A 35:181{194}

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baraniuk R (2007) Compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Process Mag 24(4):118{120, 124}

    Google Scholar 

  9. Candès E (2006) Compressive sampling. In: Proceedings of the international Congress of mathematicians, Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davenport MA, Duarte MF, Eldar YC, Kutyniok G (2010) Introduction to compressed sensing. Chapter 1, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gorodnitsky I, Rao B, George J (1992) Source localization in magnetoencephalagraphy using an iterative weighted minimum norm algorithm. In: Proceedings of the asilomar conference on signals, systems, and computers, Paci_c Grove, CA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gorodnitsky I, George J, Rao B (1995) Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 95(4):231{251}

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao B (1998) Signal processing with the sparseness constraint. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustic, speech, and signal processing (ICASSP), Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feng P, Bresler Y (1996) Spectrum-blind minimum-rate sampling and reconstruction of multiband signals. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustic, speech, and signal processing (ICASSP), Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feng P (1997) Universal spectrum blind minimum rate sampling and reconstruction of multi- band signals. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vasanawala S, Alley M, Barth R, Hargreaves B, Pauly J, Lustig M (2009) Faster pediatric MRI via compressed sensing. In: Proceedings of annual meeting society pediatric radiology (SPR), Carlsbad, CA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Candès, EJ, Tao T (2004) Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections and universal encoding strategies. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52:5406–5425

    Google Scholar 

  18. Donoho DL (2004) Compressed sensing. Technical report, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  19. Donoho DL, Vetterli M, DeVore RA, Daubechies I (1998) Data compression and harmonic analysis. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 44:2435–2476

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Bruckstein AM, Donoho DL, Elad M (2009) From sparse solutions of systems of equations to sparse modeling of signals and images. SIAM Rev 51(1):34{81}

    Google Scholar 

  21. DeVore R (1998) Nonlinear approximation. Acta Numer 7:51{150}

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elad M (2010) Sparse and redundant representations: from theory to applications in signal and image processing. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gedalyahu K, Eldar YC (2010) Time-delay estimation from low-rate samples: a union of subspaces approach. IEEE Trans Signal Process 58(6):3017{3031}

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gedalyahu KK, Tur R, Eldar YC (2011) Multichannel sampling of pulse streams at the rate of innovation. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly J (2006) Rapid MR imaging with compressed sensing and randomly under-sampled 3DFT trajectories. Proceedings of the annual meeting of ISMRM, Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mishali M, Eldar YC (2009) Blind multi-band signal reconstruction: compressed sensing for analog signals. IEEE Trans Signal Process 57(3):993{1009}

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gan L (2007) Block compressed sensing of natural images. In: Conference on digital signal processing (DSP), Cardiff, UK

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tropp JM, Duarte WM, Baron D, Baraniuk R (2006) Random filters for compressive sampling and reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing (ICASSP), Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yuan X, Yang J, Llull P, Liao X, Sapiro G, Brady DJ, Carin L (2013) Adaptive temporal compressive sensing for video. In: Proceeding of the IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I take this opportunity to thank Prof. A.H. Siddiqi who introduced to me the exciting and the most useful theme of wavelet methods in signal and image processing and now the compressive sensing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noore Zahra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zahra, N. (2015). Recent Advances in Compressive Sensing. In: Siddiqi, A., Manchanda, P., Bhardwaj, R. (eds) Mathematical Models, Methods and Applications. Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-973-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics